Cargando…

Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical results and evolution of patients who underwent minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases, using the NOMS (Neurological, Oncological, Mechanical, Systemic) assessment for the therapeutic decision. METHODS: Patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hem, Santiago, Beltrame, Sofía, Rasmussen, Jorge, Vecchi, Eduardo, Landriel, Federico, Yampolsky, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123635
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_288_18
_version_ 1783403421360979968
author Hem, Santiago
Beltrame, Sofía
Rasmussen, Jorge
Vecchi, Eduardo
Landriel, Federico
Yampolsky, Claudio
author_facet Hem, Santiago
Beltrame, Sofía
Rasmussen, Jorge
Vecchi, Eduardo
Landriel, Federico
Yampolsky, Claudio
author_sort Hem, Santiago
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical results and evolution of patients who underwent minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases, using the NOMS (Neurological, Oncological, Mechanical, Systemic) assessment for the therapeutic decision. METHODS: Patients who underwent MISS technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases were prospectively enrolled at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, from June 2014 to June 2017. In all cases, the NOMS assessments were performed for therapeutic decision making. Surgical results were analyzed in terms of improvements in Karnofsky performance status, pain relief (VAS – visual analog scale), Frankel, blood loss, need for transfusions, complications, use of opioids and hospitalization length. A P < 0.05 value was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During the study period 26 patients were included, 13 of them were women. The average age was 57-year-old (27–83 years). Breast cancer was the most frequent primary tumor (27%). The main symptom was pain (96%), although 12 patients presented with myelopathy (46%). High-grade epidural spinal cord compression requiring decompression was observed in 17 cases (65%). According to the SINS (spinal instability neoplastic score), most lesions were potentially unstable or unstable (89%) requiring MISS stabilization. After surgery, pain relief (VAS) and neurological recovery (Frankel) improved significantly in the 77% and 67% of the cases, respectively, with low intraoperative blood loss and without any transfusions. Only one minor surgical complication was presented (4%). The average of hospital stay was 5.5 days. CONCLUSION: In our series and using the NOMS as a therapeutic algorithm, MISS was effective for decompression and spinal stabilization, with a low rate of complications and rapid postoperative recovery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6416751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64167512019-05-23 Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares Hem, Santiago Beltrame, Sofía Rasmussen, Jorge Vecchi, Eduardo Landriel, Federico Yampolsky, Claudio Surg Neurol Int Original Article OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical results and evolution of patients who underwent minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases, using the NOMS (Neurological, Oncological, Mechanical, Systemic) assessment for the therapeutic decision. METHODS: Patients who underwent MISS technique for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal metastases were prospectively enrolled at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, from June 2014 to June 2017. In all cases, the NOMS assessments were performed for therapeutic decision making. Surgical results were analyzed in terms of improvements in Karnofsky performance status, pain relief (VAS – visual analog scale), Frankel, blood loss, need for transfusions, complications, use of opioids and hospitalization length. A P < 0.05 value was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: During the study period 26 patients were included, 13 of them were women. The average age was 57-year-old (27–83 years). Breast cancer was the most frequent primary tumor (27%). The main symptom was pain (96%), although 12 patients presented with myelopathy (46%). High-grade epidural spinal cord compression requiring decompression was observed in 17 cases (65%). According to the SINS (spinal instability neoplastic score), most lesions were potentially unstable or unstable (89%) requiring MISS stabilization. After surgery, pain relief (VAS) and neurological recovery (Frankel) improved significantly in the 77% and 67% of the cases, respectively, with low intraoperative blood loss and without any transfusions. Only one minor surgical complication was presented (4%). The average of hospital stay was 5.5 days. CONCLUSION: In our series and using the NOMS as a therapeutic algorithm, MISS was effective for decompression and spinal stabilization, with a low rate of complications and rapid postoperative recovery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6416751/ /pubmed/31123635 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_288_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Surgical Neurology International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hem, Santiago
Beltrame, Sofía
Rasmussen, Jorge
Vecchi, Eduardo
Landriel, Federico
Yampolsky, Claudio
Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares
title Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares
title_full Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares
title_fullStr Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares
title_full_unstemmed Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares
title_short Utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares
title_sort utilidad de la cirugía espinal mínimamente invasiva en el manejo de las metástasis espinales toraco-lumbares
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31123635
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_288_18
work_keys_str_mv AT hemsantiago utilidaddelacirugiaespinalminimamenteinvasivaenelmanejodelasmetastasisespinalestoracolumbares
AT beltramesofia utilidaddelacirugiaespinalminimamenteinvasivaenelmanejodelasmetastasisespinalestoracolumbares
AT rasmussenjorge utilidaddelacirugiaespinalminimamenteinvasivaenelmanejodelasmetastasisespinalestoracolumbares
AT vecchieduardo utilidaddelacirugiaespinalminimamenteinvasivaenelmanejodelasmetastasisespinalestoracolumbares
AT landrielfederico utilidaddelacirugiaespinalminimamenteinvasivaenelmanejodelasmetastasisespinalestoracolumbares
AT yampolskyclaudio utilidaddelacirugiaespinalminimamenteinvasivaenelmanejodelasmetastasisespinalestoracolumbares