Cargando…

Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal

BACKGROUND: The turnaround time (TAT) as defined by most of the laboratories is the time interval between the specimens received in the laboratory to the time of reports dispatched with verification. Nearly 80% of hospital-attached clinical laboratories receive complaints about delayed TAT. Reportin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatt, Rajendra Dev, Shrestha, Chandani, Risal, Prabodh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881271
_version_ 1783403432354250752
author Bhatt, Rajendra Dev
Shrestha, Chandani
Risal, Prabodh
author_facet Bhatt, Rajendra Dev
Shrestha, Chandani
Risal, Prabodh
author_sort Bhatt, Rajendra Dev
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The turnaround time (TAT) as defined by most of the laboratories is the time interval between the specimens received in the laboratory to the time of reports dispatched with verification. Nearly 80% of hospital-attached clinical laboratories receive complaints about delayed TAT. Reporting in time is a crucial indicator of quality services along with accurate, precise and reliable reports, thus each clinical laboratory should identify affecting factors to eliminate them for the enhancement of quality services. METHODOLOGY: Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital is a tertiary care hospital, where this observational descriptive study was conducted in 2017. Requested tests received on database in the Department of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory along with test requisition form (TRF) were carefully screened for any possible error. When analysis of individual patient’s tests was completed, results of individual parameters were entered in the database manually. TAT was calculated as a time period between specimens received to analysis completed. Once test analysis has completed it was immediately followed by verification. RESULTS: A total of 36,108 patients’ reports generated from the Department of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory during study period were analyzed. Nearly 36% of reports exceeded the predefined TAT in case of stat tests, while around 7% of reports were out of predefined TAT in case of routine tests. Among prolonged TAT, around 75% of reports were delayed due to various extra analytical reasons and approximately 48% of total delayed reports were found only due to error by cash unit. CONCLUSION: The major reasons of delayed laboratory reports were due to time consumed to fix the pre-analytical errors created by other departments rather than laboratory itself. Cash unit alone has the highest degree of error in total testing process and it is the most significant factor for prolonged TAT. However reasons for prolonged TAT may vary with hospital to hospital depending upon different factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6416806
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64168062019-03-15 Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal Bhatt, Rajendra Dev Shrestha, Chandani Risal, Prabodh EJIFCC Discussion BACKGROUND: The turnaround time (TAT) as defined by most of the laboratories is the time interval between the specimens received in the laboratory to the time of reports dispatched with verification. Nearly 80% of hospital-attached clinical laboratories receive complaints about delayed TAT. Reporting in time is a crucial indicator of quality services along with accurate, precise and reliable reports, thus each clinical laboratory should identify affecting factors to eliminate them for the enhancement of quality services. METHODOLOGY: Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital is a tertiary care hospital, where this observational descriptive study was conducted in 2017. Requested tests received on database in the Department of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory along with test requisition form (TRF) were carefully screened for any possible error. When analysis of individual patient’s tests was completed, results of individual parameters were entered in the database manually. TAT was calculated as a time period between specimens received to analysis completed. Once test analysis has completed it was immediately followed by verification. RESULTS: A total of 36,108 patients’ reports generated from the Department of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory during study period were analyzed. Nearly 36% of reports exceeded the predefined TAT in case of stat tests, while around 7% of reports were out of predefined TAT in case of routine tests. Among prolonged TAT, around 75% of reports were delayed due to various extra analytical reasons and approximately 48% of total delayed reports were found only due to error by cash unit. CONCLUSION: The major reasons of delayed laboratory reports were due to time consumed to fix the pre-analytical errors created by other departments rather than laboratory itself. Cash unit alone has the highest degree of error in total testing process and it is the most significant factor for prolonged TAT. However reasons for prolonged TAT may vary with hospital to hospital depending upon different factors. The Communications and Publications Division (CPD) of the IFCC 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6416806/ /pubmed/30881271 Text en Copyright © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC). All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Discussion
Bhatt, Rajendra Dev
Shrestha, Chandani
Risal, Prabodh
Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal
title Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal
title_full Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal
title_fullStr Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal
title_full_unstemmed Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal
title_short Factors Affecting Turnaround Time in the Clinical Laboratory of the Kathmandu University Hospital, Nepal
title_sort factors affecting turnaround time in the clinical laboratory of the kathmandu university hospital, nepal
topic Discussion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416806/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881271
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattrajendradev factorsaffectingturnaroundtimeintheclinicallaboratoryofthekathmanduuniversityhospitalnepal
AT shresthachandani factorsaffectingturnaroundtimeintheclinicallaboratoryofthekathmanduuniversityhospitalnepal
AT risalprabodh factorsaffectingturnaroundtimeintheclinicallaboratoryofthekathmanduuniversityhospitalnepal