Cargando…

A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Call agents spend ~ 90% of their working day seated, which may negatively impact health, productivity, and wellbeing. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a multi-component workplace intervention targeting increased activity and decreased prolonged sitting in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Abigail S., Murphy, Rebecca C., Shepherd, Sam O., Healy, Genevieve N., Edwardson, Charlotte L., Graves, Lee E. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6615-6
_version_ 1783403454504370176
author Morris, Abigail S.
Murphy, Rebecca C.
Shepherd, Sam O.
Healy, Genevieve N.
Edwardson, Charlotte L.
Graves, Lee E. F.
author_facet Morris, Abigail S.
Murphy, Rebecca C.
Shepherd, Sam O.
Healy, Genevieve N.
Edwardson, Charlotte L.
Graves, Lee E. F.
author_sort Morris, Abigail S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Call agents spend ~ 90% of their working day seated, which may negatively impact health, productivity, and wellbeing. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a multi-component workplace intervention targeting increased activity and decreased prolonged sitting in the contact centre setting prior to a full-scale effectiveness trial. METHODS: An 8-week non-randomised pre-post feasibility study was conducted. Using a mixed methods approach, focus groups and interviews were thematically analysed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of key study phases, and provide context to agents’ process evaluation and survey responses. The multi-component intervention, conducted in a single call centre, included height-adjustable workstations, emails, education and training sessions, and support from team leaders and a workplace champion. RESULTS: Six (of 20) team leaders were recruited, with 17 of 84 call agents (78% female, 39.3 ± 11.9 years) completing baseline assessments and 13 completing follow-up. High workload influenced recruitment. Call agents perceived assessments as acceptable, though strategies are needed to enhance fidelity. Education sessions, height-adjustable workstations and emails were perceived as the most effective components; however, height-adjustable hot-desks were not perceived as feasible in this setting. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified unique, pragmatic considerations for conducting a multi-level, multi-component PA and SB intervention and associated evaluation in highly sedentary call agents in the challenging contact centre setting. The intervention was largely perceived positively, with call agents and team leaders describing numerous perceived positive effects on behavioural, health and work-related outcomes. Findings will be of value to researchers attempting to intervene in contact centres and will be used by the current authors to design a subsequent trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6615-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6416901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64169012019-03-25 A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study Morris, Abigail S. Murphy, Rebecca C. Shepherd, Sam O. Healy, Genevieve N. Edwardson, Charlotte L. Graves, Lee E. F. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Call agents spend ~ 90% of their working day seated, which may negatively impact health, productivity, and wellbeing. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a multi-component workplace intervention targeting increased activity and decreased prolonged sitting in the contact centre setting prior to a full-scale effectiveness trial. METHODS: An 8-week non-randomised pre-post feasibility study was conducted. Using a mixed methods approach, focus groups and interviews were thematically analysed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of key study phases, and provide context to agents’ process evaluation and survey responses. The multi-component intervention, conducted in a single call centre, included height-adjustable workstations, emails, education and training sessions, and support from team leaders and a workplace champion. RESULTS: Six (of 20) team leaders were recruited, with 17 of 84 call agents (78% female, 39.3 ± 11.9 years) completing baseline assessments and 13 completing follow-up. High workload influenced recruitment. Call agents perceived assessments as acceptable, though strategies are needed to enhance fidelity. Education sessions, height-adjustable workstations and emails were perceived as the most effective components; however, height-adjustable hot-desks were not perceived as feasible in this setting. CONCLUSIONS: This study has identified unique, pragmatic considerations for conducting a multi-level, multi-component PA and SB intervention and associated evaluation in highly sedentary call agents in the challenging contact centre setting. The intervention was largely perceived positively, with call agents and team leaders describing numerous perceived positive effects on behavioural, health and work-related outcomes. Findings will be of value to researchers attempting to intervene in contact centres and will be used by the current authors to design a subsequent trial. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6615-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6416901/ /pubmed/30866872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6615-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morris, Abigail S.
Murphy, Rebecca C.
Shepherd, Sam O.
Healy, Genevieve N.
Edwardson, Charlotte L.
Graves, Lee E. F.
A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study
title A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study
title_full A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study
title_fullStr A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study
title_short A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study
title_sort multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6615-6
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisabigails amulticomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT murphyrebeccac amulticomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT shepherdsamo amulticomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT healygenevieven amulticomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT edwardsoncharlottel amulticomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT gravesleeef amulticomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT morrisabigails multicomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT murphyrebeccac multicomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT shepherdsamo multicomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT healygenevieven multicomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT edwardsoncharlottel multicomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy
AT gravesleeef multicomponentinterventiontositlessandmovemoreinacontactcentresettingafeasibilitystudy