Cargando…
Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation
BACKGROUND: Clinical variation in ovarian cancer care has been reported internationally. Using Wennberg’s classification of clinical variation as effective care we can conceptualise variation through deviation from clinical guidelines. The aim of this review was to address knowledge gaps in the effe...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4 |
_version_ | 1783403454744494080 |
---|---|
author | White, Kahren M. Seale, Holly Harrison, Reema |
author_facet | White, Kahren M. Seale, Holly Harrison, Reema |
author_sort | White, Kahren M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical variation in ovarian cancer care has been reported internationally. Using Wennberg’s classification of clinical variation as effective care we can conceptualise variation through deviation from clinical guidelines. The aim of this review was to address knowledge gaps in the effectiveness of attempts to reduce unwarranted clinical variation through addressing the following questions: What is the evidence of guideline adherence in ovarian cancer and its deviation?; what are the key factors associated with variation in guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?; and what quality improvement approaches have been used and what is the evidence of their effectiveness in enhancing guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?. METHODS: Keywords and synonyms for the major concepts of ovarian cancer, guideline adherence and safety were developed and combined to form the search strategy. Systematic searches of four electronic databases were undertaken of publications from January 2007 to November 2018. Retrieved articles were assessed against the eligibility criteria to determine those for inclusion. RESULTS: Thirty-two papers were included in the review with three broad groupings identified: adherence to and deviation from guidelines (either local, national or international guidelines); factors impacting guidelines adherence; and quality improvement approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Unwarranted clinical variation may be used as a marker for the effectiveness of a health system, based on the outcome of this systematic review. This review found that the implementation of quality indicators through a formal quality improvement program lead to improvements in guideline adherent care. Further research on outcomes of implementing quality improvement programs in ovarian cancer care will improve the ability to implement centralised care and further identify factors that to improve outcomes in ovarian cancer care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6416902 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64169022019-03-25 Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation White, Kahren M. Seale, Holly Harrison, Reema BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical variation in ovarian cancer care has been reported internationally. Using Wennberg’s classification of clinical variation as effective care we can conceptualise variation through deviation from clinical guidelines. The aim of this review was to address knowledge gaps in the effectiveness of attempts to reduce unwarranted clinical variation through addressing the following questions: What is the evidence of guideline adherence in ovarian cancer and its deviation?; what are the key factors associated with variation in guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?; and what quality improvement approaches have been used and what is the evidence of their effectiveness in enhancing guideline adherence in ovarian cancer care?. METHODS: Keywords and synonyms for the major concepts of ovarian cancer, guideline adherence and safety were developed and combined to form the search strategy. Systematic searches of four electronic databases were undertaken of publications from January 2007 to November 2018. Retrieved articles were assessed against the eligibility criteria to determine those for inclusion. RESULTS: Thirty-two papers were included in the review with three broad groupings identified: adherence to and deviation from guidelines (either local, national or international guidelines); factors impacting guidelines adherence; and quality improvement approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Unwarranted clinical variation may be used as a marker for the effectiveness of a health system, based on the outcome of this systematic review. This review found that the implementation of quality indicators through a formal quality improvement program lead to improvements in guideline adherent care. Further research on outcomes of implementing quality improvement programs in ovarian cancer care will improve the ability to implement centralised care and further identify factors that to improve outcomes in ovarian cancer care. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6416902/ /pubmed/30866891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article White, Kahren M. Seale, Holly Harrison, Reema Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation |
title | Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation |
title_full | Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation |
title_fullStr | Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation |
title_short | Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation |
title_sort | enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6416902/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6633-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT whitekahrenm enhancingovariancancercareasystematicreviewofguidelineadherenceandclinicalvariation AT sealeholly enhancingovariancancercareasystematicreviewofguidelineadherenceandclinicalvariation AT harrisonreema enhancingovariancancercareasystematicreviewofguidelineadherenceandclinicalvariation |