Cargando…

Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The etiology of non-specific low back pain (LBP) is complex and not well understood. LBP is common and causes a remarkable health burden worldwide. Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) is potentially a risk factor for development of LBP, although this relationship has been questioned. Yet only o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rannisto, Satu, Okuloff, Annaleena, Uitti, Jukka, Paananen, Markus, Rannisto, Pasi-Heikki, Malmivaara, Antti, Karppinen, Jaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2478-3
_version_ 1783403482987888640
author Rannisto, Satu
Okuloff, Annaleena
Uitti, Jukka
Paananen, Markus
Rannisto, Pasi-Heikki
Malmivaara, Antti
Karppinen, Jaro
author_facet Rannisto, Satu
Okuloff, Annaleena
Uitti, Jukka
Paananen, Markus
Rannisto, Pasi-Heikki
Malmivaara, Antti
Karppinen, Jaro
author_sort Rannisto, Satu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The etiology of non-specific low back pain (LBP) is complex and not well understood. LBP is common and causes a remarkable health burden worldwide. Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) is potentially a risk factor for development of LBP, although this relationship has been questioned. Yet only one randomized controlled study (RCT) has been performed. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of insoles with leg-length discrepancy (LLD) correction compared to insoles without LLD correction among meat cutters in a RCT-design. METHODS: The study population consisted 387 meat cutters who were over 35 years old and had been working 10 years or more. The LLD measurement was done by a laser ultrasound technique. All workers with an LLD of at least 5 mm and an LBP intensity of at least 2 on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale were eligible. The LLD of all the participants in the intervention group was corrected 70%, which means that if the LLD was for example 10 mm the correction was 7 mm. The insoles were used at work for eight hours per day. The control group had insoles without LLD correction. The primary outcome was between-group difference in LBP intensity. Secondary outcomes included sciatic pain intensity, disability (Roland Morris), RAND-36, the Oswestry Disability Index, physician visits and days on sick leave over the first year. We used a repeated measures regression analysis with adjustments for age, gender and BMI. The hurdle model was used for days on sick leave. RESULTS: In all, 169 workers were invited and 114 (67%) responded. Of them, 42 were eligible and were randomized to the intervention (n = 20) or control group (n = 22). The workers in the intervention group had a higher improvement in LBP intensity (− 2.6; 95% confidence intervals − 3.7 – − 1.4), intensity of sciatic pain (− 2.3; − 3.4 – − 1.07) and RAND-36 physical functioning (9.6; 1.6–17.6) and a lesser likelihood of sick leaves (OR -3.7; − 7.2 - -0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Correction of LLD with insoles was an effective intervention among workers with LBP and a standing job. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11898558. Registration date 11. Feb 2011. BioMed Central Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6417033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64170332019-03-25 Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial Rannisto, Satu Okuloff, Annaleena Uitti, Jukka Paananen, Markus Rannisto, Pasi-Heikki Malmivaara, Antti Karppinen, Jaro BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The etiology of non-specific low back pain (LBP) is complex and not well understood. LBP is common and causes a remarkable health burden worldwide. Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) is potentially a risk factor for development of LBP, although this relationship has been questioned. Yet only one randomized controlled study (RCT) has been performed. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effect of insoles with leg-length discrepancy (LLD) correction compared to insoles without LLD correction among meat cutters in a RCT-design. METHODS: The study population consisted 387 meat cutters who were over 35 years old and had been working 10 years or more. The LLD measurement was done by a laser ultrasound technique. All workers with an LLD of at least 5 mm and an LBP intensity of at least 2 on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale were eligible. The LLD of all the participants in the intervention group was corrected 70%, which means that if the LLD was for example 10 mm the correction was 7 mm. The insoles were used at work for eight hours per day. The control group had insoles without LLD correction. The primary outcome was between-group difference in LBP intensity. Secondary outcomes included sciatic pain intensity, disability (Roland Morris), RAND-36, the Oswestry Disability Index, physician visits and days on sick leave over the first year. We used a repeated measures regression analysis with adjustments for age, gender and BMI. The hurdle model was used for days on sick leave. RESULTS: In all, 169 workers were invited and 114 (67%) responded. Of them, 42 were eligible and were randomized to the intervention (n = 20) or control group (n = 22). The workers in the intervention group had a higher improvement in LBP intensity (− 2.6; 95% confidence intervals − 3.7 – − 1.4), intensity of sciatic pain (− 2.3; − 3.4 – − 1.07) and RAND-36 physical functioning (9.6; 1.6–17.6) and a lesser likelihood of sick leaves (OR -3.7; − 7.2 - -0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Correction of LLD with insoles was an effective intervention among workers with LBP and a standing job. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN11898558. Registration date 11. Feb 2011. BioMed Central Ltd. BioMed Central 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6417033/ /pubmed/30871549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2478-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rannisto, Satu
Okuloff, Annaleena
Uitti, Jukka
Paananen, Markus
Rannisto, Pasi-Heikki
Malmivaara, Antti
Karppinen, Jaro
Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort correction of leg-length discrepancy among meat cutters with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2478-3
work_keys_str_mv AT rannistosatu correctionofleglengthdiscrepancyamongmeatcutterswithlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT okuloffannaleena correctionofleglengthdiscrepancyamongmeatcutterswithlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT uittijukka correctionofleglengthdiscrepancyamongmeatcutterswithlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT paananenmarkus correctionofleglengthdiscrepancyamongmeatcutterswithlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rannistopasiheikki correctionofleglengthdiscrepancyamongmeatcutterswithlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT malmivaaraantti correctionofleglengthdiscrepancyamongmeatcutterswithlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT karppinenjaro correctionofleglengthdiscrepancyamongmeatcutterswithlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledtrial