Cargando…

LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda

BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the principal tool for malaria control in Africa and are presently treated with a single class of insecticide; however, increasing levels of insecticide resistance threaten their success. In response to this threat nets have been developed that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynd, Amy, Gonahasa, Samuel, Staedke, Sarah G., Oruni, Ambrose, Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine, Dorsey, Grant, Opigo, Jimmy, Yeka, Adoke, Katureebe, Agaba, Kyohere, Mary, Hemingway, Janet, Kamya, Moses R., Donnelly, Martin J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30867018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3353-7
_version_ 1783403483978792960
author Lynd, Amy
Gonahasa, Samuel
Staedke, Sarah G.
Oruni, Ambrose
Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine
Dorsey, Grant
Opigo, Jimmy
Yeka, Adoke
Katureebe, Agaba
Kyohere, Mary
Hemingway, Janet
Kamya, Moses R.
Donnelly, Martin J.
author_facet Lynd, Amy
Gonahasa, Samuel
Staedke, Sarah G.
Oruni, Ambrose
Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine
Dorsey, Grant
Opigo, Jimmy
Yeka, Adoke
Katureebe, Agaba
Kyohere, Mary
Hemingway, Janet
Kamya, Moses R.
Donnelly, Martin J.
author_sort Lynd, Amy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the principal tool for malaria control in Africa and are presently treated with a single class of insecticide; however, increasing levels of insecticide resistance threaten their success. In response to this threat nets have been developed that incorporate the synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO), which inhibits the activity of cytochrome P450s which is one main mechanisms of insecticide resistance, allowing resistance to pyrethroids to be reversed. However, data on the value and cost effectiveness of these nets is lacking. A large-scale cluster randomised trial of conventional LLINs and PBO-LLINs was conducted in Uganda in 104 health sub-districts (HSDs) in 2017–2019. Prior to the mass distribution of LLINs, a baseline entomological survey was carried out, the results of which are reported herein. Ten households from each HSD were randomly selected for entomological surveillance at baseline which included household mosquito collections. RESULTS: Prior to LLIN distribution entomological collections were carried out in 1029 houses across the 104 HSDs. Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) was the principal vector in all but 9 of the 71 HSDs that yielded vector species. Molecular analysis found An. gambiae (s.s.) to be the predominant vector collected. Plasmodium falciparum was detected in 5.5% of An. gambiae (s.s.) and in 4.0% of An. funestus (s.s.) examined. Infection rates of other plasmodium species (P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae) were lower with infection rates of 1.2% and 1.7% for An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. funestus (s.s.), respectively. The knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation Vgsc-L1014S was found at very high frequency in An. gambiae (s.s.) with the Vgsc-L1014F mutation at low frequency and the wild-type allele virtually absent. In An. arabiensis the wild-type allele was predominant. The resistance-associated alleles, Cyp4j5-L43F and Coeae1d were found at moderate frequencies which varied across the study site. Vgsc-N1575Y mutation was not found in any samples examined. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences between planned intervention arms was observed in vector densities, sporozoite infection rate or insecticide resistance marker frequency across the study site prior to the distribution of LLINs. Very high levels of kdr resistance were observed in all areas; however, the resistance-associated markers Cyp4j5-L43F and Coeae1d were found at varying frequencies across the study site which may have implications for the effectiveness of standard LLINs. Trial registration This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN17516395. Registered 14 February 2017, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17516395 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-019-3353-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6417037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64170372019-03-25 LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda Lynd, Amy Gonahasa, Samuel Staedke, Sarah G. Oruni, Ambrose Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine Dorsey, Grant Opigo, Jimmy Yeka, Adoke Katureebe, Agaba Kyohere, Mary Hemingway, Janet Kamya, Moses R. Donnelly, Martin J. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the principal tool for malaria control in Africa and are presently treated with a single class of insecticide; however, increasing levels of insecticide resistance threaten their success. In response to this threat nets have been developed that incorporate the synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO), which inhibits the activity of cytochrome P450s which is one main mechanisms of insecticide resistance, allowing resistance to pyrethroids to be reversed. However, data on the value and cost effectiveness of these nets is lacking. A large-scale cluster randomised trial of conventional LLINs and PBO-LLINs was conducted in Uganda in 104 health sub-districts (HSDs) in 2017–2019. Prior to the mass distribution of LLINs, a baseline entomological survey was carried out, the results of which are reported herein. Ten households from each HSD were randomly selected for entomological surveillance at baseline which included household mosquito collections. RESULTS: Prior to LLIN distribution entomological collections were carried out in 1029 houses across the 104 HSDs. Anopheles gambiae (s.l.) was the principal vector in all but 9 of the 71 HSDs that yielded vector species. Molecular analysis found An. gambiae (s.s.) to be the predominant vector collected. Plasmodium falciparum was detected in 5.5% of An. gambiae (s.s.) and in 4.0% of An. funestus (s.s.) examined. Infection rates of other plasmodium species (P. vivax, P. ovale and P. malariae) were lower with infection rates of 1.2% and 1.7% for An. gambiae (s.s.) and An. funestus (s.s.), respectively. The knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation Vgsc-L1014S was found at very high frequency in An. gambiae (s.s.) with the Vgsc-L1014F mutation at low frequency and the wild-type allele virtually absent. In An. arabiensis the wild-type allele was predominant. The resistance-associated alleles, Cyp4j5-L43F and Coeae1d were found at moderate frequencies which varied across the study site. Vgsc-N1575Y mutation was not found in any samples examined. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences between planned intervention arms was observed in vector densities, sporozoite infection rate or insecticide resistance marker frequency across the study site prior to the distribution of LLINs. Very high levels of kdr resistance were observed in all areas; however, the resistance-associated markers Cyp4j5-L43F and Coeae1d were found at varying frequencies across the study site which may have implications for the effectiveness of standard LLINs. Trial registration This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN17516395. Registered 14 February 2017, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17516395 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-019-3353-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6417037/ /pubmed/30867018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3353-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lynd, Amy
Gonahasa, Samuel
Staedke, Sarah G.
Oruni, Ambrose
Maiteki-Sebuguzi, Catherine
Dorsey, Grant
Opigo, Jimmy
Yeka, Adoke
Katureebe, Agaba
Kyohere, Mary
Hemingway, Janet
Kamya, Moses R.
Donnelly, Martin J.
LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda
title LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda
title_full LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda
title_fullStr LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda
title_full_unstemmed LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda
title_short LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of Uganda
title_sort llin evaluation in uganda project (llineup): a cross-sectional survey of species diversity and insecticide resistance in 48 districts of uganda
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30867018
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3353-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lyndamy llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT gonahasasamuel llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT staedkesarahg llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT oruniambrose llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT maitekisebuguzicatherine llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT dorseygrant llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT opigojimmy llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT yekaadoke llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT katureebeagaba llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT kyoheremary llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT hemingwayjanet llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT kamyamosesr llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda
AT donnellymartinj llinevaluationinugandaprojectllineupacrosssectionalsurveyofspeciesdiversityandinsecticideresistancein48districtsofuganda