Cargando…

Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia

BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli is bacteria that exist as commensal in the intestine of animals and humans, but pathogenic strains cause disease in chickens. The development of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli is one of major concern worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November, 20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarba, Edilu Jorga, Kelbesa, Kebede Abdisa, Bayu, Morka Dandecha, Gebremedhin, Endrias Zewdu, Borena, Bizunesh Mideksa, Teshale, Ayichew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1830-z
_version_ 1783403503135227904
author Sarba, Edilu Jorga
Kelbesa, Kebede Abdisa
Bayu, Morka Dandecha
Gebremedhin, Endrias Zewdu
Borena, Bizunesh Mideksa
Teshale, Ayichew
author_facet Sarba, Edilu Jorga
Kelbesa, Kebede Abdisa
Bayu, Morka Dandecha
Gebremedhin, Endrias Zewdu
Borena, Bizunesh Mideksa
Teshale, Ayichew
author_sort Sarba, Edilu Jorga
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli is bacteria that exist as commensal in the intestine of animals and humans, but pathogenic strains cause disease in chickens. The development of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli is one of major concern worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November, 2015 to April, 2016 in and around Ambo town on backyard chicken with the objectives of isolating E. coli from selected visceral organs, assessment of potential risk factor and determination of antimicrobial resistance pattern of the isolates. RESULTS: The overall isolation rate of E. coli was 11.5% (80/694) [95% CI: 9.64–14.61] and 32.5% (62/191) [95% CI: 25.39–39.09] at organ and chicken level, respectively. E. coli isolation rate was 15.2% (29/191), 13.6% (27/191), 6.3% (12/191) and 10.7% (13/121) from spleen, liver, kidney and ovary samples, respectively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed higher probability of E. coli isolation from adult (adjusted Odds ratio [aOR] =2.5, P = 0.013) than younger chickens, from clinically sick chickens (aOR = 3.0, P = 0.003) than apparently healthy. E. coli isolates were 100% susceptible to ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim followed by 89–63.4% susceptibility to gentamicin, streptomycin, ceftazidime, nalidxic acid, nitrofurantoin, kanamycin, amikacin and chloramphenicol. Whereas, 100% resistance was observed against cloxacilin, cefotaxime and amoxicillin, whereas 92.7 and 46.3% were resistant to cefuroxime, and tetracycline, respectively. Multidrug resistant (MDR) was observed in 78.1% (64/82) of the isolates which exhibited 5 different MDR patterns to 7 antimicrobial classes. CONCLUSIONS: Higher isolation rate of E. coli was observed from visceral organs of chickens. Age and health status were predictors of E. coli isolation. Remarkable numbers of the isolates are resistant to different antimicrobials and multidrug resistant E coli isolates are widespread in the area. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1830-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6417126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64171262019-03-25 Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia Sarba, Edilu Jorga Kelbesa, Kebede Abdisa Bayu, Morka Dandecha Gebremedhin, Endrias Zewdu Borena, Bizunesh Mideksa Teshale, Ayichew BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli is bacteria that exist as commensal in the intestine of animals and humans, but pathogenic strains cause disease in chickens. The development of antimicrobial resistance in E. coli is one of major concern worldwide. A cross-sectional study was conducted from November, 2015 to April, 2016 in and around Ambo town on backyard chicken with the objectives of isolating E. coli from selected visceral organs, assessment of potential risk factor and determination of antimicrobial resistance pattern of the isolates. RESULTS: The overall isolation rate of E. coli was 11.5% (80/694) [95% CI: 9.64–14.61] and 32.5% (62/191) [95% CI: 25.39–39.09] at organ and chicken level, respectively. E. coli isolation rate was 15.2% (29/191), 13.6% (27/191), 6.3% (12/191) and 10.7% (13/121) from spleen, liver, kidney and ovary samples, respectively. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed higher probability of E. coli isolation from adult (adjusted Odds ratio [aOR] =2.5, P = 0.013) than younger chickens, from clinically sick chickens (aOR = 3.0, P = 0.003) than apparently healthy. E. coli isolates were 100% susceptible to ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim followed by 89–63.4% susceptibility to gentamicin, streptomycin, ceftazidime, nalidxic acid, nitrofurantoin, kanamycin, amikacin and chloramphenicol. Whereas, 100% resistance was observed against cloxacilin, cefotaxime and amoxicillin, whereas 92.7 and 46.3% were resistant to cefuroxime, and tetracycline, respectively. Multidrug resistant (MDR) was observed in 78.1% (64/82) of the isolates which exhibited 5 different MDR patterns to 7 antimicrobial classes. CONCLUSIONS: Higher isolation rate of E. coli was observed from visceral organs of chickens. Age and health status were predictors of E. coli isolation. Remarkable numbers of the isolates are resistant to different antimicrobials and multidrug resistant E coli isolates are widespread in the area. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12917-019-1830-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6417126/ /pubmed/30866928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1830-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sarba, Edilu Jorga
Kelbesa, Kebede Abdisa
Bayu, Morka Dandecha
Gebremedhin, Endrias Zewdu
Borena, Bizunesh Mideksa
Teshale, Ayichew
Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia
title Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia
title_full Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia
title_fullStr Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia
title_short Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, Central Ethiopia
title_sort identification and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of escherichia coli isolated from backyard chicken in and around ambo, central ethiopia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30866928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1830-z
work_keys_str_mv AT sarbaedilujorga identificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofileofescherichiacoliisolatedfrombackyardchickeninandaroundambocentralethiopia
AT kelbesakebedeabdisa identificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofileofescherichiacoliisolatedfrombackyardchickeninandaroundambocentralethiopia
AT bayumorkadandecha identificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofileofescherichiacoliisolatedfrombackyardchickeninandaroundambocentralethiopia
AT gebremedhinendriaszewdu identificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofileofescherichiacoliisolatedfrombackyardchickeninandaroundambocentralethiopia
AT borenabizuneshmideksa identificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofileofescherichiacoliisolatedfrombackyardchickeninandaroundambocentralethiopia
AT teshaleayichew identificationandantimicrobialsusceptibilityprofileofescherichiacoliisolatedfrombackyardchickeninandaroundambocentralethiopia