Cargando…
An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unprecedented efficacy in multiple malignancies; however, the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance are poorly understood and predictive biomarkers are scarce. INSPIRE is a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the genomic and immune landscap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30867072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0 |
_version_ | 1783403517978869760 |
---|---|
author | Clouthier, Derek L. Lien, Scott C. Yang, S. Y. Cindy Nguyen, Linh T. Manem, Venkata S. K. Gray, Diana Ryczko, Michael Razak, Albiruni R. A. Lewin, Jeremy Lheureux, Stephanie Colombo, Ilaria Bedard, Philippe L. Cescon, David Spreafico, Anna Butler, Marcus O. Hansen, Aaron R. Jang, Raymond W. Ghai, Sangeet Weinreb, Ilan Sotov, Valentin Gadalla, Ramy Noamani, Babak Guo, Mengdi Elston, Sawako Giesler, Amanda Hakgor, Sevan Jiang, Haiyan McGaha, Tracy Brooks, David G. Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Pugh, Trevor J. Ohashi, Pamela S. Siu, Lillian L. |
author_facet | Clouthier, Derek L. Lien, Scott C. Yang, S. Y. Cindy Nguyen, Linh T. Manem, Venkata S. K. Gray, Diana Ryczko, Michael Razak, Albiruni R. A. Lewin, Jeremy Lheureux, Stephanie Colombo, Ilaria Bedard, Philippe L. Cescon, David Spreafico, Anna Butler, Marcus O. Hansen, Aaron R. Jang, Raymond W. Ghai, Sangeet Weinreb, Ilan Sotov, Valentin Gadalla, Ramy Noamani, Babak Guo, Mengdi Elston, Sawako Giesler, Amanda Hakgor, Sevan Jiang, Haiyan McGaha, Tracy Brooks, David G. Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Pugh, Trevor J. Ohashi, Pamela S. Siu, Lillian L. |
author_sort | Clouthier, Derek L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unprecedented efficacy in multiple malignancies; however, the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance are poorly understood and predictive biomarkers are scarce. INSPIRE is a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the genomic and immune landscapes of peripheral blood and tumors following pembrolizumab treatment. METHODS: Patients with incurable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed on standard therapy, or for whom no standard therapy exists or standard therapy was not deemed appropriate, received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every three weeks. Blood and tissue samples were collected at baseline, during treatment, and at progression. One core biopsy was used for immunohistochemistry and the remaining cores were pooled and divided for genomic and immune analyses. Univariable analysis of clinical, genomic, and immunophenotyping parameters was conducted to evaluate associations with treatment response in this exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled from March 21, 2016 to June 1, 2017, and 129 tumor and 382 blood samples were collected. Immune biomarkers were significantly different between the blood and tissue. T cell PD-1 was blocked (≥98%) in the blood of all patients by the third week of treatment. In the tumor, 5/11 (45%) and 11/14 (79%) patients had T cell surface PD-1 occupance at weeks six and nine, respectively. The proportion of genome copy number alterations and abundance of intratumoral 4-1BB+ PD-1+ CD8 T cells at baseline (P < 0.05), and fold-expansion of intratumoral CD8 T cells from baseline to cycle 2–3 (P < 0.05) were associated with treatment response. CONCLUSION: This study provides technical feasibility data for correlative studies. Tissue biopsies provide distinct data from the blood and may predict response to pembrolizumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6417194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64171942019-03-25 An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) Clouthier, Derek L. Lien, Scott C. Yang, S. Y. Cindy Nguyen, Linh T. Manem, Venkata S. K. Gray, Diana Ryczko, Michael Razak, Albiruni R. A. Lewin, Jeremy Lheureux, Stephanie Colombo, Ilaria Bedard, Philippe L. Cescon, David Spreafico, Anna Butler, Marcus O. Hansen, Aaron R. Jang, Raymond W. Ghai, Sangeet Weinreb, Ilan Sotov, Valentin Gadalla, Ramy Noamani, Babak Guo, Mengdi Elston, Sawako Giesler, Amanda Hakgor, Sevan Jiang, Haiyan McGaha, Tracy Brooks, David G. Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Pugh, Trevor J. Ohashi, Pamela S. Siu, Lillian L. J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unprecedented efficacy in multiple malignancies; however, the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance are poorly understood and predictive biomarkers are scarce. INSPIRE is a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the genomic and immune landscapes of peripheral blood and tumors following pembrolizumab treatment. METHODS: Patients with incurable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed on standard therapy, or for whom no standard therapy exists or standard therapy was not deemed appropriate, received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every three weeks. Blood and tissue samples were collected at baseline, during treatment, and at progression. One core biopsy was used for immunohistochemistry and the remaining cores were pooled and divided for genomic and immune analyses. Univariable analysis of clinical, genomic, and immunophenotyping parameters was conducted to evaluate associations with treatment response in this exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled from March 21, 2016 to June 1, 2017, and 129 tumor and 382 blood samples were collected. Immune biomarkers were significantly different between the blood and tissue. T cell PD-1 was blocked (≥98%) in the blood of all patients by the third week of treatment. In the tumor, 5/11 (45%) and 11/14 (79%) patients had T cell surface PD-1 occupance at weeks six and nine, respectively. The proportion of genome copy number alterations and abundance of intratumoral 4-1BB+ PD-1+ CD8 T cells at baseline (P < 0.05), and fold-expansion of intratumoral CD8 T cells from baseline to cycle 2–3 (P < 0.05) were associated with treatment response. CONCLUSION: This study provides technical feasibility data for correlative studies. Tissue biopsies provide distinct data from the blood and may predict response to pembrolizumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6417194/ /pubmed/30867072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Clouthier, Derek L. Lien, Scott C. Yang, S. Y. Cindy Nguyen, Linh T. Manem, Venkata S. K. Gray, Diana Ryczko, Michael Razak, Albiruni R. A. Lewin, Jeremy Lheureux, Stephanie Colombo, Ilaria Bedard, Philippe L. Cescon, David Spreafico, Anna Butler, Marcus O. Hansen, Aaron R. Jang, Raymond W. Ghai, Sangeet Weinreb, Ilan Sotov, Valentin Gadalla, Ramy Noamani, Babak Guo, Mengdi Elston, Sawako Giesler, Amanda Hakgor, Sevan Jiang, Haiyan McGaha, Tracy Brooks, David G. Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Pugh, Trevor J. Ohashi, Pamela S. Siu, Lillian L. An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) |
title | An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) |
title_full | An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) |
title_fullStr | An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) |
title_full_unstemmed | An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) |
title_short | An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) |
title_sort | interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (inspire) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30867072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clouthierderekl aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT lienscottc aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT yangsycindy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT nguyenlinht aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT manemvenkatask aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT graydiana aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT ryczkomichael aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT razakalbirunira aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT lewinjeremy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT lheureuxstephanie aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT colomboilaria aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT bedardphilippel aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT cescondavid aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT spreaficoanna aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT butlermarcuso aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT hansenaaronr aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT jangraymondw aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT ghaisangeet aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT weinrebilan aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT sotovvalentin aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT gadallaramy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT noamanibabak aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT guomengdi aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT elstonsawako aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT giesleramanda aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT hakgorsevan aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT jianghaiyan aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT mcgahatracy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT brooksdavidg aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT haibekainsbenjamin aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT pughtrevorj aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT ohashipamelas aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT siulillianl aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT clouthierderekl interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT lienscottc interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT yangsycindy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT nguyenlinht interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT manemvenkatask interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT graydiana interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT ryczkomichael interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT razakalbirunira interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT lewinjeremy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT lheureuxstephanie interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT colomboilaria interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT bedardphilippel interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT cescondavid interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT spreaficoanna interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT butlermarcuso interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT hansenaaronr interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT jangraymondw interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT ghaisangeet interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT weinrebilan interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT sotovvalentin interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT gadallaramy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT noamanibabak interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT guomengdi interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT elstonsawako interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT giesleramanda interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT hakgorsevan interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT jianghaiyan interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT mcgahatracy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT brooksdavidg interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT haibekainsbenjamin interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT pughtrevorj interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT ohashipamelas interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire AT siulillianl interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire |