Cargando…

An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unprecedented efficacy in multiple malignancies; however, the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance are poorly understood and predictive biomarkers are scarce. INSPIRE is a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the genomic and immune landscap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clouthier, Derek L., Lien, Scott C., Yang, S. Y. Cindy, Nguyen, Linh T., Manem, Venkata S. K., Gray, Diana, Ryczko, Michael, Razak, Albiruni R. A., Lewin, Jeremy, Lheureux, Stephanie, Colombo, Ilaria, Bedard, Philippe L., Cescon, David, Spreafico, Anna, Butler, Marcus O., Hansen, Aaron R., Jang, Raymond W., Ghai, Sangeet, Weinreb, Ilan, Sotov, Valentin, Gadalla, Ramy, Noamani, Babak, Guo, Mengdi, Elston, Sawako, Giesler, Amanda, Hakgor, Sevan, Jiang, Haiyan, McGaha, Tracy, Brooks, David G., Haibe-Kains, Benjamin, Pugh, Trevor J., Ohashi, Pamela S., Siu, Lillian L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30867072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0
_version_ 1783403517978869760
author Clouthier, Derek L.
Lien, Scott C.
Yang, S. Y. Cindy
Nguyen, Linh T.
Manem, Venkata S. K.
Gray, Diana
Ryczko, Michael
Razak, Albiruni R. A.
Lewin, Jeremy
Lheureux, Stephanie
Colombo, Ilaria
Bedard, Philippe L.
Cescon, David
Spreafico, Anna
Butler, Marcus O.
Hansen, Aaron R.
Jang, Raymond W.
Ghai, Sangeet
Weinreb, Ilan
Sotov, Valentin
Gadalla, Ramy
Noamani, Babak
Guo, Mengdi
Elston, Sawako
Giesler, Amanda
Hakgor, Sevan
Jiang, Haiyan
McGaha, Tracy
Brooks, David G.
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
Pugh, Trevor J.
Ohashi, Pamela S.
Siu, Lillian L.
author_facet Clouthier, Derek L.
Lien, Scott C.
Yang, S. Y. Cindy
Nguyen, Linh T.
Manem, Venkata S. K.
Gray, Diana
Ryczko, Michael
Razak, Albiruni R. A.
Lewin, Jeremy
Lheureux, Stephanie
Colombo, Ilaria
Bedard, Philippe L.
Cescon, David
Spreafico, Anna
Butler, Marcus O.
Hansen, Aaron R.
Jang, Raymond W.
Ghai, Sangeet
Weinreb, Ilan
Sotov, Valentin
Gadalla, Ramy
Noamani, Babak
Guo, Mengdi
Elston, Sawako
Giesler, Amanda
Hakgor, Sevan
Jiang, Haiyan
McGaha, Tracy
Brooks, David G.
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
Pugh, Trevor J.
Ohashi, Pamela S.
Siu, Lillian L.
author_sort Clouthier, Derek L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unprecedented efficacy in multiple malignancies; however, the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance are poorly understood and predictive biomarkers are scarce. INSPIRE is a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the genomic and immune landscapes of peripheral blood and tumors following pembrolizumab treatment. METHODS: Patients with incurable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed on standard therapy, or for whom no standard therapy exists or standard therapy was not deemed appropriate, received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every three weeks. Blood and tissue samples were collected at baseline, during treatment, and at progression. One core biopsy was used for immunohistochemistry and the remaining cores were pooled and divided for genomic and immune analyses. Univariable analysis of clinical, genomic, and immunophenotyping parameters was conducted to evaluate associations with treatment response in this exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled from March 21, 2016 to June 1, 2017, and 129 tumor and 382 blood samples were collected. Immune biomarkers were significantly different between the blood and tissue. T cell PD-1 was blocked (≥98%) in the blood of all patients by the third week of treatment. In the tumor, 5/11 (45%) and 11/14 (79%) patients had T cell surface PD-1 occupance at weeks six and nine, respectively. The proportion of genome copy number alterations and abundance of intratumoral 4-1BB+ PD-1+ CD8 T cells at baseline (P < 0.05), and fold-expansion of intratumoral CD8 T cells from baseline to cycle 2–3 (P < 0.05) were associated with treatment response. CONCLUSION: This study provides technical feasibility data for correlative studies. Tissue biopsies provide distinct data from the blood and may predict response to pembrolizumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6417194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64171942019-03-25 An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE) Clouthier, Derek L. Lien, Scott C. Yang, S. Y. Cindy Nguyen, Linh T. Manem, Venkata S. K. Gray, Diana Ryczko, Michael Razak, Albiruni R. A. Lewin, Jeremy Lheureux, Stephanie Colombo, Ilaria Bedard, Philippe L. Cescon, David Spreafico, Anna Butler, Marcus O. Hansen, Aaron R. Jang, Raymond W. Ghai, Sangeet Weinreb, Ilan Sotov, Valentin Gadalla, Ramy Noamani, Babak Guo, Mengdi Elston, Sawako Giesler, Amanda Hakgor, Sevan Jiang, Haiyan McGaha, Tracy Brooks, David G. Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Pugh, Trevor J. Ohashi, Pamela S. Siu, Lillian L. J Immunother Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate unprecedented efficacy in multiple malignancies; however, the mechanisms of sensitivity and resistance are poorly understood and predictive biomarkers are scarce. INSPIRE is a phase 2 basket study to evaluate the genomic and immune landscapes of peripheral blood and tumors following pembrolizumab treatment. METHODS: Patients with incurable, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors that have progressed on standard therapy, or for whom no standard therapy exists or standard therapy was not deemed appropriate, received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every three weeks. Blood and tissue samples were collected at baseline, during treatment, and at progression. One core biopsy was used for immunohistochemistry and the remaining cores were pooled and divided for genomic and immune analyses. Univariable analysis of clinical, genomic, and immunophenotyping parameters was conducted to evaluate associations with treatment response in this exploratory analysis. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled from March 21, 2016 to June 1, 2017, and 129 tumor and 382 blood samples were collected. Immune biomarkers were significantly different between the blood and tissue. T cell PD-1 was blocked (≥98%) in the blood of all patients by the third week of treatment. In the tumor, 5/11 (45%) and 11/14 (79%) patients had T cell surface PD-1 occupance at weeks six and nine, respectively. The proportion of genome copy number alterations and abundance of intratumoral 4-1BB+ PD-1+ CD8 T cells at baseline (P < 0.05), and fold-expansion of intratumoral CD8 T cells from baseline to cycle 2–3 (P < 0.05) were associated with treatment response. CONCLUSION: This study provides technical feasibility data for correlative studies. Tissue biopsies provide distinct data from the blood and may predict response to pembrolizumab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6417194/ /pubmed/30867072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Clouthier, Derek L.
Lien, Scott C.
Yang, S. Y. Cindy
Nguyen, Linh T.
Manem, Venkata S. K.
Gray, Diana
Ryczko, Michael
Razak, Albiruni R. A.
Lewin, Jeremy
Lheureux, Stephanie
Colombo, Ilaria
Bedard, Philippe L.
Cescon, David
Spreafico, Anna
Butler, Marcus O.
Hansen, Aaron R.
Jang, Raymond W.
Ghai, Sangeet
Weinreb, Ilan
Sotov, Valentin
Gadalla, Ramy
Noamani, Babak
Guo, Mengdi
Elston, Sawako
Giesler, Amanda
Hakgor, Sevan
Jiang, Haiyan
McGaha, Tracy
Brooks, David G.
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
Pugh, Trevor J.
Ohashi, Pamela S.
Siu, Lillian L.
An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)
title An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)
title_full An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)
title_fullStr An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)
title_full_unstemmed An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)
title_short An interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (INSPIRE)
title_sort interim report on the investigator-initiated phase 2 study of pembrolizumab immunological response evaluation (inspire)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30867072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0541-0
work_keys_str_mv AT clouthierderekl aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT lienscottc aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT yangsycindy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT nguyenlinht aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT manemvenkatask aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT graydiana aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT ryczkomichael aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT razakalbirunira aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT lewinjeremy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT lheureuxstephanie aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT colomboilaria aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT bedardphilippel aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT cescondavid aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT spreaficoanna aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT butlermarcuso aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT hansenaaronr aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT jangraymondw aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT ghaisangeet aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT weinrebilan aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT sotovvalentin aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT gadallaramy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT noamanibabak aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT guomengdi aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT elstonsawako aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT giesleramanda aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT hakgorsevan aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT jianghaiyan aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT mcgahatracy aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT brooksdavidg aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT haibekainsbenjamin aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT pughtrevorj aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT ohashipamelas aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT siulillianl aninterimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT clouthierderekl interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT lienscottc interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT yangsycindy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT nguyenlinht interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT manemvenkatask interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT graydiana interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT ryczkomichael interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT razakalbirunira interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT lewinjeremy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT lheureuxstephanie interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT colomboilaria interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT bedardphilippel interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT cescondavid interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT spreaficoanna interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT butlermarcuso interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT hansenaaronr interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT jangraymondw interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT ghaisangeet interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT weinrebilan interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT sotovvalentin interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT gadallaramy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT noamanibabak interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT guomengdi interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT elstonsawako interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT giesleramanda interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT hakgorsevan interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT jianghaiyan interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT mcgahatracy interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT brooksdavidg interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT haibekainsbenjamin interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT pughtrevorj interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT ohashipamelas interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire
AT siulillianl interimreportontheinvestigatorinitiatedphase2studyofpembrolizumabimmunologicalresponseevaluationinspire