Cargando…
Anatomical location of AICA loop in CPA as a prognostic factor for ISSNHL
The cerebellopontine angle (CPA) is a triangular-shaped space that lies at the junction of the pons and cerebellum. It contains cranial nerves and the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA). The anatomical shape and location of the AICA is variable within the CPA and internal auditory canal (IAC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30881768 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6582 |
Sumario: | The cerebellopontine angle (CPA) is a triangular-shaped space that lies at the junction of the pons and cerebellum. It contains cranial nerves and the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA). The anatomical shape and location of the AICA is variable within the CPA and internal auditory canal (IAC). A possible etiology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is ischemia of the labyrinthine artery, which is a branch of the AICA. As such, the position of the AICA within the CPA and IAC may be related to the clinical development of ISSNHL. We adopted two methods to classify the anatomic position of the AICA, then analyzed whether these classifications affected the clinical features and prognosis of ISSNHL. We retrospectively reviewed patient data from January 2015 to March 2018. Two established classification methods designed by Cahvada and Gorrie et al. were used. Pure tone threshold at four different frequencies (0.5, 1, 4, and 8 kHz), at two different time points (at initial presentation and three months after treatment), were analyzed. We compared the affected and unaffected ears, and investigated whether there were any differences in hearing recovery and symptoms between the two classification types. There was no difference in AICA types between ears with and without ISSNHL. Patients who had combined symptoms such as tinnitus and vertigo did not show a different AICA distribution compared with patients who did not. There were differences in quantitative hearing improvement between AICA types, although without statistic significance (p = 0.09–0.13). At two frequencies, 1 and 4 kHz, there were differences in Chavda types between hearing improvement and no improvement (p < 0.05). Anatomical variances of the AICA loop position did not affect the incidence of ISSNHL or co-morbid symptoms including tinnitus and vertigo. In contrast, comparisons of hearing improvement based on Chavda type classification showed a statistical difference, with a higher proportion of Chavda type 1 showing improvements in hearing (AICA outside IAC). |
---|