Cargando…
Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria
Intraspecific hybridization between diverged populations can enhance fitness via various genetic mechanisms. The benefits of such admixture have been proposed to be particularly relevant in biological invasions, when invasive populations originating from different source populations are found sympat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1707-2 |
_version_ | 1783403570151817216 |
---|---|
author | Shi, Jun Macel, Mirka Tielbörger, Katja Verhoeven, Koen J. F. |
author_facet | Shi, Jun Macel, Mirka Tielbörger, Katja Verhoeven, Koen J. F. |
author_sort | Shi, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intraspecific hybridization between diverged populations can enhance fitness via various genetic mechanisms. The benefits of such admixture have been proposed to be particularly relevant in biological invasions, when invasive populations originating from different source populations are found sympatrically. However, it remains poorly understood if admixture is an important contributor to plant invasive success and how admixture effects compare between invasive and native ranges. Here, we used experimental crosses in Lythrum salicaria, a species with well-established history of multiple introductions to Eastern North America, to quantify and compare admixture effects in native European and invasive North American populations. We observed heterosis in between-population crosses both in native and invasive ranges. However, invasive-range heterosis was restricted to crosses between two different Eastern and Western invasion fronts, whereas heterosis was absent in geographically distant crosses within a single large invasion front. Our results suggest that multiple introductions have led to already-admixed invasion fronts, such that experimental crosses do not further increase performance, but that contact between different invasion fronts further enhances fitness after admixture. Thus, intra-continental movement of invasive plants in their introduced range has the potential to boost invasiveness even in well-established and successfully spreading invasive species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10530-018-1707-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6417435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64174352019-04-03 Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria Shi, Jun Macel, Mirka Tielbörger, Katja Verhoeven, Koen J. F. Biol Invasions Original Paper Intraspecific hybridization between diverged populations can enhance fitness via various genetic mechanisms. The benefits of such admixture have been proposed to be particularly relevant in biological invasions, when invasive populations originating from different source populations are found sympatrically. However, it remains poorly understood if admixture is an important contributor to plant invasive success and how admixture effects compare between invasive and native ranges. Here, we used experimental crosses in Lythrum salicaria, a species with well-established history of multiple introductions to Eastern North America, to quantify and compare admixture effects in native European and invasive North American populations. We observed heterosis in between-population crosses both in native and invasive ranges. However, invasive-range heterosis was restricted to crosses between two different Eastern and Western invasion fronts, whereas heterosis was absent in geographically distant crosses within a single large invasion front. Our results suggest that multiple introductions have led to already-admixed invasion fronts, such that experimental crosses do not further increase performance, but that contact between different invasion fronts further enhances fitness after admixture. Thus, intra-continental movement of invasive plants in their introduced range has the potential to boost invasiveness even in well-established and successfully spreading invasive species. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10530-018-1707-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-21 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6417435/ /pubmed/30956538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1707-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Shi, Jun Macel, Mirka Tielbörger, Katja Verhoeven, Koen J. F. Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria |
title | Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria |
title_full | Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria |
title_fullStr | Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria |
title_short | Effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria |
title_sort | effects of admixture in native and invasive populations of lythrum salicaria |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30956538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1707-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shijun effectsofadmixtureinnativeandinvasivepopulationsoflythrumsalicaria AT macelmirka effectsofadmixtureinnativeandinvasivepopulationsoflythrumsalicaria AT tielborgerkatja effectsofadmixtureinnativeandinvasivepopulationsoflythrumsalicaria AT verhoevenkoenjf effectsofadmixtureinnativeandinvasivepopulationsoflythrumsalicaria |