Cargando…
A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants
BACKGROUND: Frailty indices (FIs) measure variation in health between aging individuals. Researching FIs in resources with large-scale genetic and phenotypic data will provide insights into the causes and consequences of frailty. Thus, we aimed to develop an FI using UK Biobank data, a cohort study...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly094 |
_version_ | 1783403572171374592 |
---|---|
author | Williams, Dylan M Jylhävä, Juulia Pedersen, Nancy L Hägg, Sara |
author_facet | Williams, Dylan M Jylhävä, Juulia Pedersen, Nancy L Hägg, Sara |
author_sort | Williams, Dylan M |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Frailty indices (FIs) measure variation in health between aging individuals. Researching FIs in resources with large-scale genetic and phenotypic data will provide insights into the causes and consequences of frailty. Thus, we aimed to develop an FI using UK Biobank data, a cohort study of 500,000 middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: An FI was calculated using 49 self-reported questionnaire items on traits covering health, presence of diseases and disabilities, and mental well-being, according to standard protocol. We used multiple imputation to derive FI values for the entire eligible sample in the presence of missing item data (N = 500,336). To validate the measure, we assessed associations of the FI with age, sex, and risk of all-cause mortality (follow-up ≤ 9.7 years) using linear and Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Mean FI in the cohort was 0.125 (SD = 0.075), and there was a curvilinear trend toward higher values in older participants. FI values were also marginally higher on average in women than in men. In survival models, 10% higher baseline frailty (ie, a 0.1 FI increment) was associated with higher risk of death (hazard ratio = 1.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.62–1.68). Associations were stronger in younger participants than in older participants, and in men than in women (hazard ratios: 1.72 vs. 1.56, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The FI is a valid measure of frailty in UK Biobank. The cohort’s data are open access for researchers to use, and we provide script for deriving this tool to facilitate future studies on frailty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6417451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64174512019-03-19 A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants Williams, Dylan M Jylhävä, Juulia Pedersen, Nancy L Hägg, Sara J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci The Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences BACKGROUND: Frailty indices (FIs) measure variation in health between aging individuals. Researching FIs in resources with large-scale genetic and phenotypic data will provide insights into the causes and consequences of frailty. Thus, we aimed to develop an FI using UK Biobank data, a cohort study of 500,000 middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: An FI was calculated using 49 self-reported questionnaire items on traits covering health, presence of diseases and disabilities, and mental well-being, according to standard protocol. We used multiple imputation to derive FI values for the entire eligible sample in the presence of missing item data (N = 500,336). To validate the measure, we assessed associations of the FI with age, sex, and risk of all-cause mortality (follow-up ≤ 9.7 years) using linear and Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: Mean FI in the cohort was 0.125 (SD = 0.075), and there was a curvilinear trend toward higher values in older participants. FI values were also marginally higher on average in women than in men. In survival models, 10% higher baseline frailty (ie, a 0.1 FI increment) was associated with higher risk of death (hazard ratio = 1.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.62–1.68). Associations were stronger in younger participants than in older participants, and in men than in women (hazard ratios: 1.72 vs. 1.56, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The FI is a valid measure of frailty in UK Biobank. The cohort’s data are open access for researchers to use, and we provide script for deriving this tool to facilitate future studies on frailty. Oxford University Press 2019-03 2018-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6417451/ /pubmed/29924297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly094 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | The Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences Williams, Dylan M Jylhävä, Juulia Pedersen, Nancy L Hägg, Sara A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants |
title | A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants |
title_full | A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants |
title_fullStr | A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants |
title_full_unstemmed | A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants |
title_short | A Frailty Index for UK Biobank Participants |
title_sort | frailty index for uk biobank participants |
topic | The Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT williamsdylanm afrailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants AT jylhavajuulia afrailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants AT pedersennancyl afrailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants AT haggsara afrailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants AT williamsdylanm frailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants AT jylhavajuulia frailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants AT pedersennancyl frailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants AT haggsara frailtyindexforukbiobankparticipants |