Cargando…

Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis and pneumonia are common problems in the intensive care units (ICUs) and cause high morbidity and mortality. Optimal doses and appropriate routes of antibiotics are critical to improve their efficacy, but their appropriate routes remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The efficac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Chang-Hua, Chen, Yu-Min, Chang, Yu-Jun, Wang, Shu-Hui, Chang, Chih-Yen, Yen, Hua-Cheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30855448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014632
_version_ 1783403590928302080
author Chen, Chang-Hua
Chen, Yu-Min
Chang, Yu-Jun
Wang, Shu-Hui
Chang, Chih-Yen
Yen, Hua-Cheng
author_facet Chen, Chang-Hua
Chen, Yu-Min
Chang, Yu-Jun
Wang, Shu-Hui
Chang, Chih-Yen
Yen, Hua-Cheng
author_sort Chen, Chang-Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis and pneumonia are common problems in the intensive care units (ICUs) and cause high morbidity and mortality. Optimal doses and appropriate routes of antibiotics are critical to improve their efficacy, but their appropriate routes remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of antibiotic administration among critically ill patient populations remains controversial. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of antibiotic administration in patients with infection and to assess whether the effect differs between the two antibiotic administration types. METHODS: A systematic search of studies on continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics and traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics for patients with infection was performed mainly in PubMed. The odds ratios (ORs) of the microbiological results as primary outcome and mortality rate, length of stay, and duration of antibiotic treatment as secondary outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective studies comprising 1957 participants. Current analysis showed that the overall OR of clinical success between the continuous and intermittent groups was 0.675 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.523–0.870). Comparing continuous and intermittent groups, the subgroup analysis showed a lower ICU stay (OR 0.834, 95% CI: 0.542–1.282), a higher mortality (OR 1.433, 95% CI: 1.139–1.801), and a longer antibiotic duration (OR 1.055, 95% CI: 0.659–1.689), but the results of present meta-analysis were not significant because of the limited number of enrolled trials. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity of included trials and studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of present meta-analysis were insufficient to recommend continuous infusion of intravenous antibiotics better than traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics at routine clinical care. Hope large-scale RCT to provide more rebuts evidence for making recommendations to warrant continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics at clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6417613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64176132019-03-16 Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review Chen, Chang-Hua Chen, Yu-Min Chang, Yu-Jun Wang, Shu-Hui Chang, Chih-Yen Yen, Hua-Cheng Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article BACKGROUND: Severe sepsis and pneumonia are common problems in the intensive care units (ICUs) and cause high morbidity and mortality. Optimal doses and appropriate routes of antibiotics are critical to improve their efficacy, but their appropriate routes remain controversial. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of antibiotic administration among critically ill patient populations remains controversial. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of antibiotic administration in patients with infection and to assess whether the effect differs between the two antibiotic administration types. METHODS: A systematic search of studies on continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics and traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics for patients with infection was performed mainly in PubMed. The odds ratios (ORs) of the microbiological results as primary outcome and mortality rate, length of stay, and duration of antibiotic treatment as secondary outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The meta-analysis comprised 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective studies comprising 1957 participants. Current analysis showed that the overall OR of clinical success between the continuous and intermittent groups was 0.675 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.523–0.870). Comparing continuous and intermittent groups, the subgroup analysis showed a lower ICU stay (OR 0.834, 95% CI: 0.542–1.282), a higher mortality (OR 1.433, 95% CI: 1.139–1.801), and a longer antibiotic duration (OR 1.055, 95% CI: 0.659–1.689), but the results of present meta-analysis were not significant because of the limited number of enrolled trials. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity of included trials and studies. CONCLUSIONS: The results of present meta-analysis were insufficient to recommend continuous infusion of intravenous antibiotics better than traditional intermittent infusions of antibiotics at routine clinical care. Hope large-scale RCT to provide more rebuts evidence for making recommendations to warrant continuous infusions of intravenous antibiotics at clinical practice. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6417613/ /pubmed/30855448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014632 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Chang-Hua
Chen, Yu-Min
Chang, Yu-Jun
Wang, Shu-Hui
Chang, Chih-Yen
Yen, Hua-Cheng
Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review
title Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: Meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort continuous versus intermittent infusions of antibiotics for the treatment of infectious diseases: meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30855448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014632
work_keys_str_mv AT chenchanghua continuousversusintermittentinfusionsofantibioticsforthetreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT chenyumin continuousversusintermittentinfusionsofantibioticsforthetreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT changyujun continuousversusintermittentinfusionsofantibioticsforthetreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT wangshuhui continuousversusintermittentinfusionsofantibioticsforthetreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT changchihyen continuousversusintermittentinfusionsofantibioticsforthetreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesmetaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT yenhuacheng continuousversusintermittentinfusionsofantibioticsforthetreatmentofinfectiousdiseasesmetaanalysisandsystematicreview