Cargando…

A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials

Among various approaches to the repeated measures analysis in crossover clinical trials, the general linear models (GLMs) with correlated errors attract substantial attention due to their simplicity in model specification, implementation, and interpretation. The goal of this research note is to cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Wei, Cong, Ning, Chen, Tian, Zhang, Hui, Zhang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30870443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213436
_version_ 1783403610954006528
author Wang, Wei
Cong, Ning
Chen, Tian
Zhang, Hui
Zhang, Bo
author_facet Wang, Wei
Cong, Ning
Chen, Tian
Zhang, Hui
Zhang, Bo
author_sort Wang, Wei
collection PubMed
description Among various approaches to the repeated measures analysis in crossover clinical trials, the general linear models (GLMs) with correlated errors attract substantial attention due to their simplicity in model specification, implementation, and interpretation. The goal of this research note is to conduct simulation studies to numerically investigate the impact of model misspecification in the GLMs with correlated errors in the analysis of crossover trials. A series of synthetic two-treatment and three-treatment crossover trials were designed, and simulation studies were conducted to assess how treatment effect estimation, type I error rates, and power can be affected by misspecified period effects, carryover effects, and variance-covariance structures in the GLMs. Numerical studies confirm that (i) the GLMs with terms for both carryover and period effects and with an unstructured variance-covariance matrix can provide unbiased treatment effect estimates and control of Type I error rates and that (ii) misspecification in either period effects, carryover effects, or covariance structures in the GLMs can induce inflated type I error, declined power, or biased treatment effect estimates. Although methodologic contribution of this research note is minimal, we provide practical recommendations and advice to pharmaceutical sponsors and other investigational drugs and device applicants in designing and analyzing crossover trials using the GLMs with correlated errors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6417712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64177122019-04-01 A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials Wang, Wei Cong, Ning Chen, Tian Zhang, Hui Zhang, Bo PLoS One Research Article Among various approaches to the repeated measures analysis in crossover clinical trials, the general linear models (GLMs) with correlated errors attract substantial attention due to their simplicity in model specification, implementation, and interpretation. The goal of this research note is to conduct simulation studies to numerically investigate the impact of model misspecification in the GLMs with correlated errors in the analysis of crossover trials. A series of synthetic two-treatment and three-treatment crossover trials were designed, and simulation studies were conducted to assess how treatment effect estimation, type I error rates, and power can be affected by misspecified period effects, carryover effects, and variance-covariance structures in the GLMs. Numerical studies confirm that (i) the GLMs with terms for both carryover and period effects and with an unstructured variance-covariance matrix can provide unbiased treatment effect estimates and control of Type I error rates and that (ii) misspecification in either period effects, carryover effects, or covariance structures in the GLMs can induce inflated type I error, declined power, or biased treatment effect estimates. Although methodologic contribution of this research note is minimal, we provide practical recommendations and advice to pharmaceutical sponsors and other investigational drugs and device applicants in designing and analyzing crossover trials using the GLMs with correlated errors. Public Library of Science 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6417712/ /pubmed/30870443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213436 Text en © 2019 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Wei
Cong, Ning
Chen, Tian
Zhang, Hui
Zhang, Bo
A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials
title A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials
title_full A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials
title_fullStr A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials
title_short A note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials
title_sort note on misspecification in general linear models with correlated errors for the analysis of crossover clinical trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30870443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213436
work_keys_str_mv AT wangwei anoteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT congning anoteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT chentian anoteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT zhanghui anoteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT zhangbo anoteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT wangwei noteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT congning noteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT chentian noteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT zhanghui noteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials
AT zhangbo noteonmisspecificationingenerallinearmodelswithcorrelatederrorsfortheanalysisofcrossoverclinicaltrials