Cargando…
Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech
Speech comprehension requires effort in demanding listening situations. Selective attention may be required for focusing on a specific talker in a multi-talker environment, may enhance effort by requiring additional cognitive resources, and is known to enhance the neural representation of the attend...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6418035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30906273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00449 |
_version_ | 1783403647298699264 |
---|---|
author | Müller, Jana Annina Wendt, Dorothea Kollmeier, Birger Debener, Stefan Brand, Thomas |
author_facet | Müller, Jana Annina Wendt, Dorothea Kollmeier, Birger Debener, Stefan Brand, Thomas |
author_sort | Müller, Jana Annina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Speech comprehension requires effort in demanding listening situations. Selective attention may be required for focusing on a specific talker in a multi-talker environment, may enhance effort by requiring additional cognitive resources, and is known to enhance the neural representation of the attended talker in the listener’s neural response. The aim of the study was to investigate the relation of listening effort, as quantified by subjective effort ratings and pupil dilation, and neural speech tracking during sentence recognition. Task demands were varied using sentences with varying levels of linguistic complexity and using two different speech rates in a picture-matching paradigm with 20 normal-hearing listeners. The participants’ task was to match the acoustically presented sentence with a picture presented before the acoustic stimulus. Afterwards they rated their perceived effort on a categorical effort scale. During each trial, pupil dilation (as an indicator of listening effort) and electroencephalogram (as an indicator of neural speech tracking) were recorded. Neither measure was significantly affected by linguistic complexity. However, speech rate showed a strong influence on subjectively rated effort, pupil dilation, and neural tracking. The neural tracking analysis revealed a shorter latency for faster sentences, which may reflect a neural adaptation to the rate of the input. No relation was found between neural tracking and listening effort, even though both measures were clearly influenced by speech rate. This is probably due to factors that influence both measures differently. Consequently, the amount of listening effort is not clearly represented in the neural tracking. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6418035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64180352019-03-22 Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech Müller, Jana Annina Wendt, Dorothea Kollmeier, Birger Debener, Stefan Brand, Thomas Front Psychol Psychology Speech comprehension requires effort in demanding listening situations. Selective attention may be required for focusing on a specific talker in a multi-talker environment, may enhance effort by requiring additional cognitive resources, and is known to enhance the neural representation of the attended talker in the listener’s neural response. The aim of the study was to investigate the relation of listening effort, as quantified by subjective effort ratings and pupil dilation, and neural speech tracking during sentence recognition. Task demands were varied using sentences with varying levels of linguistic complexity and using two different speech rates in a picture-matching paradigm with 20 normal-hearing listeners. The participants’ task was to match the acoustically presented sentence with a picture presented before the acoustic stimulus. Afterwards they rated their perceived effort on a categorical effort scale. During each trial, pupil dilation (as an indicator of listening effort) and electroencephalogram (as an indicator of neural speech tracking) were recorded. Neither measure was significantly affected by linguistic complexity. However, speech rate showed a strong influence on subjectively rated effort, pupil dilation, and neural tracking. The neural tracking analysis revealed a shorter latency for faster sentences, which may reflect a neural adaptation to the rate of the input. No relation was found between neural tracking and listening effort, even though both measures were clearly influenced by speech rate. This is probably due to factors that influence both measures differently. Consequently, the amount of listening effort is not clearly represented in the neural tracking. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6418035/ /pubmed/30906273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00449 Text en Copyright © 2019 Müller, Wendt, Kollmeier, Debener and Brand. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Müller, Jana Annina Wendt, Dorothea Kollmeier, Birger Debener, Stefan Brand, Thomas Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech |
title | Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech |
title_full | Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech |
title_fullStr | Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech |
title_short | Effect of Speech Rate on Neural Tracking of Speech |
title_sort | effect of speech rate on neural tracking of speech |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6418035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30906273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullerjanaannina effectofspeechrateonneuraltrackingofspeech AT wendtdorothea effectofspeechrateonneuraltrackingofspeech AT kollmeierbirger effectofspeechrateonneuraltrackingofspeech AT debenerstefan effectofspeechrateonneuraltrackingofspeech AT brandthomas effectofspeechrateonneuraltrackingofspeech |