Cargando…
Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models
Obtaining reliable population density estimates for pumas (Puma concolor) and other cryptic, wide-ranging large carnivores is challenging. Recent advancements in spatially explicit capture-recapture models have facilitated development of novel survey approaches, such as clustered sampling designs, w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6418282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30872785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40926-7 |
_version_ | 1783403705161220096 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Sean M. Wilckens, David T. Augustine, Ben C. Peyton, Mark A. Harper, Glenn C. |
author_facet | Murphy, Sean M. Wilckens, David T. Augustine, Ben C. Peyton, Mark A. Harper, Glenn C. |
author_sort | Murphy, Sean M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Obtaining reliable population density estimates for pumas (Puma concolor) and other cryptic, wide-ranging large carnivores is challenging. Recent advancements in spatially explicit capture-recapture models have facilitated development of novel survey approaches, such as clustered sampling designs, which can provide reliable density estimation for expansive areas with reduced effort. We applied clustered sampling to camera-traps to detect marked (collared) and unmarked pumas, and used generalized spatial mark-resight (SMR) models to estimate puma population density across 15,314 km(2) in the southwestern USA. Generalized SMR models outperformed conventional SMR models. Integrating telemetry data from collars on marked pumas with detection data from camera-traps substantially improved density estimates by informing cryptic activity (home range) center transiency and improving estimation of the SMR home range parameter. Modeling sex of unmarked pumas as a partially identifying categorical covariate further improved estimates. Our density estimates (0.84–1.65 puma/100 km(2)) were generally more precise (CV = 0.24–0.31) than spatially explicit estimates produced from other puma sampling methods, including biopsy darting, scat detection dogs, and regular camera-trapping. This study provides an illustrative example of the effectiveness and flexibility of our combined sampling and analytical approach for reliably estimating density of pumas and other wildlife across geographically expansive areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6418282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64182822019-03-18 Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models Murphy, Sean M. Wilckens, David T. Augustine, Ben C. Peyton, Mark A. Harper, Glenn C. Sci Rep Article Obtaining reliable population density estimates for pumas (Puma concolor) and other cryptic, wide-ranging large carnivores is challenging. Recent advancements in spatially explicit capture-recapture models have facilitated development of novel survey approaches, such as clustered sampling designs, which can provide reliable density estimation for expansive areas with reduced effort. We applied clustered sampling to camera-traps to detect marked (collared) and unmarked pumas, and used generalized spatial mark-resight (SMR) models to estimate puma population density across 15,314 km(2) in the southwestern USA. Generalized SMR models outperformed conventional SMR models. Integrating telemetry data from collars on marked pumas with detection data from camera-traps substantially improved density estimates by informing cryptic activity (home range) center transiency and improving estimation of the SMR home range parameter. Modeling sex of unmarked pumas as a partially identifying categorical covariate further improved estimates. Our density estimates (0.84–1.65 puma/100 km(2)) were generally more precise (CV = 0.24–0.31) than spatially explicit estimates produced from other puma sampling methods, including biopsy darting, scat detection dogs, and regular camera-trapping. This study provides an illustrative example of the effectiveness and flexibility of our combined sampling and analytical approach for reliably estimating density of pumas and other wildlife across geographically expansive areas. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6418282/ /pubmed/30872785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40926-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Murphy, Sean M. Wilckens, David T. Augustine, Ben C. Peyton, Mark A. Harper, Glenn C. Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models |
title | Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models |
title_full | Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models |
title_fullStr | Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models |
title_short | Improving estimation of puma (Puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models |
title_sort | improving estimation of puma (puma concolor) population density: clustered camera-trapping, telemetry data, and generalized spatial mark-resight models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6418282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30872785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40926-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphyseanm improvingestimationofpumapumaconcolorpopulationdensityclusteredcameratrappingtelemetrydataandgeneralizedspatialmarkresightmodels AT wilckensdavidt improvingestimationofpumapumaconcolorpopulationdensityclusteredcameratrappingtelemetrydataandgeneralizedspatialmarkresightmodels AT augustinebenc improvingestimationofpumapumaconcolorpopulationdensityclusteredcameratrappingtelemetrydataandgeneralizedspatialmarkresightmodels AT peytonmarka improvingestimationofpumapumaconcolorpopulationdensityclusteredcameratrappingtelemetrydataandgeneralizedspatialmarkresightmodels AT harperglennc improvingestimationofpumapumaconcolorpopulationdensityclusteredcameratrappingtelemetrydataandgeneralizedspatialmarkresightmodels |