Cargando…

Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, intubation of pregnant women has been performed using a rapid sequence induction. This is due to the classical concept that women with more than 18 weeks of pregnancy (mid-second trimester) are always considered to have an increased risk of aspiration due to a number of fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gal, Oren, Rotshtein, Mark, Feldman, Dan, Mari, Amir, Hallak, Motti, Kopelman, Yael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179562X19828372
_version_ 1783403906476277760
author Gal, Oren
Rotshtein, Mark
Feldman, Dan
Mari, Amir
Hallak, Motti
Kopelman, Yael
author_facet Gal, Oren
Rotshtein, Mark
Feldman, Dan
Mari, Amir
Hallak, Motti
Kopelman, Yael
author_sort Gal, Oren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally, intubation of pregnant women has been performed using a rapid sequence induction. This is due to the classical concept that women with more than 18 weeks of pregnancy (mid-second trimester) are always considered to have an increased risk of aspiration due to a number of factors, regardless of the fasting duration. Rapid sequence induction is associated with a higher rate of adverse events. AIMS: Our study aimed to illuminate the hypothesis that there is no difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant women and non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. Accordingly, we measured gastric volume and content before anesthesia in term-pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section, and to compare it with non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, the gastric volume and content were assessed by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) just prior to the scheduled procedure. AUS was performed in the sagittal or para-sagittal plain in the upright position and the stomach content was estimated according to the antral circumferential area. Group 1 consisted of 50 term-pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section. Group 2 consisted of 45 non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were scheduled for minor gynecologic procedure. RESULTS: Despite significant longer fasting time prior to the interventional procedure in the non-pregnant or first-trimester women group, there was no significant difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant and first-trimester pregnant women (3.2 ± 0.97 cm(2) vs 3.2 ± 0.79 cm(2); P = .97). Gastric volume was small in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Fasting gastric volume before cesarean section in term-pregnant women is small and is not different than in non-pregnant or first-trimester women undergoing minor gynecologic procedures. Ultrasound estimation of gastric volume is a reliable and easy-to-perform technique which might help in decision-making regarding the airway management prior to induction of anesthesia in pregnant women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64192452019-03-21 Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures Gal, Oren Rotshtein, Mark Feldman, Dan Mari, Amir Hallak, Motti Kopelman, Yael Clin Med Insights Womens Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Traditionally, intubation of pregnant women has been performed using a rapid sequence induction. This is due to the classical concept that women with more than 18 weeks of pregnancy (mid-second trimester) are always considered to have an increased risk of aspiration due to a number of factors, regardless of the fasting duration. Rapid sequence induction is associated with a higher rate of adverse events. AIMS: Our study aimed to illuminate the hypothesis that there is no difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant women and non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. Accordingly, we measured gastric volume and content before anesthesia in term-pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section, and to compare it with non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, the gastric volume and content were assessed by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) just prior to the scheduled procedure. AUS was performed in the sagittal or para-sagittal plain in the upright position and the stomach content was estimated according to the antral circumferential area. Group 1 consisted of 50 term-pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section. Group 2 consisted of 45 non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were scheduled for minor gynecologic procedure. RESULTS: Despite significant longer fasting time prior to the interventional procedure in the non-pregnant or first-trimester women group, there was no significant difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant and first-trimester pregnant women (3.2 ± 0.97 cm(2) vs 3.2 ± 0.79 cm(2); P = .97). Gastric volume was small in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Fasting gastric volume before cesarean section in term-pregnant women is small and is not different than in non-pregnant or first-trimester women undergoing minor gynecologic procedures. Ultrasound estimation of gastric volume is a reliable and easy-to-perform technique which might help in decision-making regarding the airway management prior to induction of anesthesia in pregnant women. SAGE Publications 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6419245/ /pubmed/30899153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179562X19828372 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Gal, Oren
Rotshtein, Mark
Feldman, Dan
Mari, Amir
Hallak, Motti
Kopelman, Yael
Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures
title Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures
title_full Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures
title_fullStr Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures
title_short Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures
title_sort estimation of gastric volume before anesthesia in term-pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section, compared with non-pregnant or first-trimester women undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30899153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1179562X19828372
work_keys_str_mv AT galoren estimationofgastricvolumebeforeanesthesiaintermpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecesareansectioncomparedwithnonpregnantorfirsttrimesterwomenundergoingminorgynecologicalsurgicalprocedures
AT rotshteinmark estimationofgastricvolumebeforeanesthesiaintermpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecesareansectioncomparedwithnonpregnantorfirsttrimesterwomenundergoingminorgynecologicalsurgicalprocedures
AT feldmandan estimationofgastricvolumebeforeanesthesiaintermpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecesareansectioncomparedwithnonpregnantorfirsttrimesterwomenundergoingminorgynecologicalsurgicalprocedures
AT mariamir estimationofgastricvolumebeforeanesthesiaintermpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecesareansectioncomparedwithnonpregnantorfirsttrimesterwomenundergoingminorgynecologicalsurgicalprocedures
AT hallakmotti estimationofgastricvolumebeforeanesthesiaintermpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecesareansectioncomparedwithnonpregnantorfirsttrimesterwomenundergoingminorgynecologicalsurgicalprocedures
AT kopelmanyael estimationofgastricvolumebeforeanesthesiaintermpregnantwomenundergoingelectivecesareansectioncomparedwithnonpregnantorfirsttrimesterwomenundergoingminorgynecologicalsurgicalprocedures