Cargando…

Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jia, Zhao, Zhe, Yin, Pengbin, Zhang, Licheng, Tang, Peifu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x
_version_ 1783403922563530752
author Li, Jia
Zhao, Zhe
Yin, Pengbin
Zhang, Licheng
Tang, Peifu
author_facet Li, Jia
Zhao, Zhe
Yin, Pengbin
Zhang, Licheng
Tang, Peifu
author_sort Li, Jia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10.0–48.8%) and largely unchanged over the past 30 years. Femoral neck fracture is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. METHODS: In this study, our group designed a plate that combines the strength of both CCS and sliding hip screw, through providing three dynamic screws at a fixed angle with a side-plate, namely the slide compression anatomic place-femoral neck (SCAP-FN). Finite element analyses (FEA) were carried out to compare the outcomes of the combination of our SCAP-FN plate with DHS+DS (derotational screw) and to those of using cannulated screws alone. RESULTS: SCAP-FN produces more stable fixation with respect to the femur and the stress distributions, stress peaks, and rotational angles. CONCLUSIONS: The FEA encouraged us that in the following biomechanical experiment, SCAP-FN may remain the strengths of both CCS and DHS+DS and show a better performance in resisting shearing and rotational forces, therefore achieving the best stability in terms of smallest displacement and rotational angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64193412019-03-27 Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis Li, Jia Zhao, Zhe Yin, Pengbin Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10.0–48.8%) and largely unchanged over the past 30 years. Femoral neck fracture is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. METHODS: In this study, our group designed a plate that combines the strength of both CCS and sliding hip screw, through providing three dynamic screws at a fixed angle with a side-plate, namely the slide compression anatomic place-femoral neck (SCAP-FN). Finite element analyses (FEA) were carried out to compare the outcomes of the combination of our SCAP-FN plate with DHS+DS (derotational screw) and to those of using cannulated screws alone. RESULTS: SCAP-FN produces more stable fixation with respect to the femur and the stress distributions, stress peaks, and rotational angles. CONCLUSIONS: The FEA encouraged us that in the following biomechanical experiment, SCAP-FN may remain the strengths of both CCS and DHS+DS and show a better performance in resisting shearing and rotational forces, therefore achieving the best stability in terms of smallest displacement and rotational angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6419341/ /pubmed/30871584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Jia
Zhao, Zhe
Yin, Pengbin
Zhang, Licheng
Tang, Peifu
Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
title Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
title_full Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
title_short Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
title_sort comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871584
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x
work_keys_str_mv AT lijia comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhaozhe comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis
AT yinpengbin comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis
AT zhanglicheng comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis
AT tangpeifu comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis