Cargando…
Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis
BACKGROUND: Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x |
_version_ | 1783403922563530752 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jia Zhao, Zhe Yin, Pengbin Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu |
author_facet | Li, Jia Zhao, Zhe Yin, Pengbin Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu |
author_sort | Li, Jia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10.0–48.8%) and largely unchanged over the past 30 years. Femoral neck fracture is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. METHODS: In this study, our group designed a plate that combines the strength of both CCS and sliding hip screw, through providing three dynamic screws at a fixed angle with a side-plate, namely the slide compression anatomic place-femoral neck (SCAP-FN). Finite element analyses (FEA) were carried out to compare the outcomes of the combination of our SCAP-FN plate with DHS+DS (derotational screw) and to those of using cannulated screws alone. RESULTS: SCAP-FN produces more stable fixation with respect to the femur and the stress distributions, stress peaks, and rotational angles. CONCLUSIONS: The FEA encouraged us that in the following biomechanical experiment, SCAP-FN may remain the strengths of both CCS and DHS+DS and show a better performance in resisting shearing and rotational forces, therefore achieving the best stability in terms of smallest displacement and rotational angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6419341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64193412019-03-27 Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis Li, Jia Zhao, Zhe Yin, Pengbin Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Current surgical interventions for the femoral neck fracture are using either cannulated screws (CCS) or a single large screw at a fixed angle with a side-plate (i.e., a sliding hip screw, AKA dynamic hip screw, DHS). Despite these interventions, the need for reoperation remains high (10.0–48.8%) and largely unchanged over the past 30 years. Femoral neck fracture is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. METHODS: In this study, our group designed a plate that combines the strength of both CCS and sliding hip screw, through providing three dynamic screws at a fixed angle with a side-plate, namely the slide compression anatomic place-femoral neck (SCAP-FN). Finite element analyses (FEA) were carried out to compare the outcomes of the combination of our SCAP-FN plate with DHS+DS (derotational screw) and to those of using cannulated screws alone. RESULTS: SCAP-FN produces more stable fixation with respect to the femur and the stress distributions, stress peaks, and rotational angles. CONCLUSIONS: The FEA encouraged us that in the following biomechanical experiment, SCAP-FN may remain the strengths of both CCS and DHS+DS and show a better performance in resisting shearing and rotational forces, therefore achieving the best stability in terms of smallest displacement and rotational angle. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6419341/ /pubmed/30871584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Jia Zhao, Zhe Yin, Pengbin Zhang, Licheng Tang, Peifu Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis |
title | Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis |
title_full | Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis |
title_short | Comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis |
title_sort | comparison of three different internal fixation implants in treatment of femoral neck fracture—a finite element analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1097-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijia comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis AT zhaozhe comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis AT yinpengbin comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis AT zhanglicheng comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis AT tangpeifu comparisonofthreedifferentinternalfixationimplantsintreatmentoffemoralneckfractureafiniteelementanalysis |