Cargando…

The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of vasopressin receptor agonists in septic shoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Libing, Sheng, Yi, Feng, Xia, Wu, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4
_version_ 1783403944405368832
author Jiang, Libing
Sheng, Yi
Feng, Xia
Wu, Jing
author_facet Jiang, Libing
Sheng, Yi
Feng, Xia
Wu, Jing
author_sort Jiang, Libing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of vasopressin receptor agonists in septic shock patients. Two reviewers performed literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation independently. The primary outcome was mortality. And secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of adverse events. In addition, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed. RESULTS: Twenty studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The results showed vasopressin receptor agonists use was associated with reduced mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 0.99; I(2) = 0%). Nevertheless, they had no significant effects on ICU length of stay (mean deviation (MD) − 0.08, 95% CI, − 0.68 to 0.52, I(2) = 0%) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD − 0.58, 95% CI − 1.47 to 0.31, I(2) = 57%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in total adverse events between two groups (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.90, I(2) = 57%), but vasopressin receptor agonists administration could significantly increase the risk of digital ischemia (RR 4.85, 95% CI 2.81 to 8.39, I(2) = 26%). Finally, there was no statistical difference of cardiovascular events (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.57, I(2) = 1%), arrhythmia (0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.23, I(2) = 23%), mesenteric ischemia (0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.55, I(2) = 0%), diarrhea (2.47, 95% CI 0.77 to 7.96, I(2) = 49%), cerebrovascular events (1.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 10.54, I(2) = 0%), and hyponatremia (1.47, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.55, I(2) = 0%) between two groups. Egger’s test showed there was no significant publication bias among studies (P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: The use of vasopressin might result in reduced mortality in patients with septic shock. An increased risk of digital ischemia must be taken into account. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64194322019-03-27 The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Jiang, Libing Sheng, Yi Feng, Xia Wu, Jing Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of vasopressin receptor agonists in septic shock patients. Two reviewers performed literature selection, data extraction, and quality evaluation independently. The primary outcome was mortality. And secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and incidence of adverse events. In addition, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed. RESULTS: Twenty studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The results showed vasopressin receptor agonists use was associated with reduced mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 0.99; I(2) = 0%). Nevertheless, they had no significant effects on ICU length of stay (mean deviation (MD) − 0.08, 95% CI, − 0.68 to 0.52, I(2) = 0%) and duration of mechanical ventilation (MD − 0.58, 95% CI − 1.47 to 0.31, I(2) = 57%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in total adverse events between two groups (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.90, I(2) = 57%), but vasopressin receptor agonists administration could significantly increase the risk of digital ischemia (RR 4.85, 95% CI 2.81 to 8.39, I(2) = 26%). Finally, there was no statistical difference of cardiovascular events (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.57, I(2) = 1%), arrhythmia (0.77, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.23, I(2) = 23%), mesenteric ischemia (0.83, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.55, I(2) = 0%), diarrhea (2.47, 95% CI 0.77 to 7.96, I(2) = 49%), cerebrovascular events (1.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 10.54, I(2) = 0%), and hyponatremia (1.47, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.55, I(2) = 0%) between two groups. Egger’s test showed there was no significant publication bias among studies (P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: The use of vasopressin might result in reduced mortality in patients with septic shock. An increased risk of digital ischemia must be taken into account. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6419432/ /pubmed/30871607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Jiang, Libing
Sheng, Yi
Feng, Xia
Wu, Jing
The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_short The effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
title_sort effects and safety of vasopressin receptor agonists in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30871607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2362-4
work_keys_str_mv AT jianglibing theeffectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT shengyi theeffectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT fengxia theeffectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT wujing theeffectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT jianglibing effectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT shengyi effectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT fengxia effectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT wujing effectsandsafetyofvasopressinreceptoragonistsinpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis