Cargando…

Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h

BACKGROUND: The recommended adult dose of ceftaroline fosamil is 600 mg q12h by 1 h intravenous (iv) infusion for 5–14 days in complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI) and 5–7 days in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A dosage of 600 mg q8h by 2 h iv infusion is approved in some regions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Karen, Pypstra, Rienk, Yan, Jean Li, Hammond, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30597021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky519
_version_ 1783403981271203840
author Cheng, Karen
Pypstra, Rienk
Yan, Jean Li
Hammond, Jennifer
author_facet Cheng, Karen
Pypstra, Rienk
Yan, Jean Li
Hammond, Jennifer
author_sort Cheng, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recommended adult dose of ceftaroline fosamil is 600 mg q12h by 1 h intravenous (iv) infusion for 5–14 days in complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI) and 5–7 days in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A dosage of 600 mg q8h by 2 h iv infusion is approved in some regions for cSSTI patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection where the ceftaroline MIC is 2 or 4 mg/L. This analysis compares the safety profiles of the q8h and q12h regimens. METHODS: Safety data from six Phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical trials were collated into the q8h cSSTI pool (ceftaroline fosamil n = 506; NCT01499277) and the q12h pool {ceftaroline fosamil n = 1686; comprising five studies [two cSSTI (NCT00424190 and NCT00423657) and three CAP (NCT01371838, NCT00621504 and NCT00509106)]}. RESULTS: The pattern and incidence of adverse events were similar between the q8h and q12h ceftaroline fosamil pools. Most were gastrointestinal and of mild or moderate intensity. Overall, rash intensity was similar between the q8h pool and the q12h pool. For the q8h regimen, there was a higher frequency of rash in some Asian study sites, associated with longer duration of therapy (≥7 days); most cases were mild and resolved following treatment discontinuation. No dose-related vital sign or ECG abnormalities were detected with either regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The q8h regimen in cSSTI was generally well tolerated; the observed safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of ceftaroline fosamil, reflective of the cephalosporin class and qualitatively consistent with the q12h regimen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64196142019-03-20 Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h Cheng, Karen Pypstra, Rienk Yan, Jean Li Hammond, Jennifer J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research BACKGROUND: The recommended adult dose of ceftaroline fosamil is 600 mg q12h by 1 h intravenous (iv) infusion for 5–14 days in complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI) and 5–7 days in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A dosage of 600 mg q8h by 2 h iv infusion is approved in some regions for cSSTI patients with Staphylococcus aureus infection where the ceftaroline MIC is 2 or 4 mg/L. This analysis compares the safety profiles of the q8h and q12h regimens. METHODS: Safety data from six Phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical trials were collated into the q8h cSSTI pool (ceftaroline fosamil n = 506; NCT01499277) and the q12h pool {ceftaroline fosamil n = 1686; comprising five studies [two cSSTI (NCT00424190 and NCT00423657) and three CAP (NCT01371838, NCT00621504 and NCT00509106)]}. RESULTS: The pattern and incidence of adverse events were similar between the q8h and q12h ceftaroline fosamil pools. Most were gastrointestinal and of mild or moderate intensity. Overall, rash intensity was similar between the q8h pool and the q12h pool. For the q8h regimen, there was a higher frequency of rash in some Asian study sites, associated with longer duration of therapy (≥7 days); most cases were mild and resolved following treatment discontinuation. No dose-related vital sign or ECG abnormalities were detected with either regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The q8h regimen in cSSTI was generally well tolerated; the observed safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of ceftaroline fosamil, reflective of the cephalosporin class and qualitatively consistent with the q12h regimen. Oxford University Press 2019-04 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6419614/ /pubmed/30597021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky519 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Cheng, Karen
Pypstra, Rienk
Yan, Jean Li
Hammond, Jennifer
Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h
title Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h
title_full Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h
title_fullStr Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h
title_full_unstemmed Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h
title_short Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h
title_sort summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30597021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dky519
work_keys_str_mv AT chengkaren summaryofthesafetyandtolerabilityoftwotreatmentregimensofceftarolinefosamil600mgevery8hversus600mgevery12h
AT pypstrarienk summaryofthesafetyandtolerabilityoftwotreatmentregimensofceftarolinefosamil600mgevery8hversus600mgevery12h
AT yanjeanli summaryofthesafetyandtolerabilityoftwotreatmentregimensofceftarolinefosamil600mgevery8hversus600mgevery12h
AT hammondjennifer summaryofthesafetyandtolerabilityoftwotreatmentregimensofceftarolinefosamil600mgevery8hversus600mgevery12h