Cargando…

Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study

BACKGROUND: Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS. These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used and their different settings, including ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yumoto, Tetsuya, Fujita, Takahisa, Asaba, Sunao, Kanazawa, Shunsuke, Nishimatsu, Atsunori, Yamanouchi, Hideo, Nakagawa, Satoshi, Nagano, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0229-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS. These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used and their different settings, including inspiratory time % (IT%). The aims of this study were to obtain basic data about the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators and to elucidate the effect of the oscillator and IT% on ventilation efficiency. METHODS: The Metran R100 or SensorMedics 3100B was connected to an original lung model internally equipped with a simulated bronchial tree. The actual stroke volume (aSV) was measured with a flow sensor placed at the Y-piece. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) was continuously insufflated into the lung model ([Formula: see text] CO(2)), and the partial pressure of CO(2) (PCO(2)) in the lung model was monitored. Alveolar ventilation ([Formula: see text] A; L/min) was estimated as [Formula: see text] CO(2) divided by the stabilized value of PCO(2). [Formula: see text] A was evaluated with several stroke volume settings in the R100 (IT = 50%) or several airway pressure amplitude settings in the 3100B (IT = 33%, 50%) at a frequency of 6 and 8 Hz, a mean airway pressure of 25 cmH(2)O, and a bias flow of 30 L/min. Assuming that [Formula: see text] A = frequency(a) × aSV(b), values of a and b were determined. Ventilation efficiency was calculated as [Formula: see text] A divided by actual minute ventilation. RESULTS: The relationship between aSV and [Formula: see text] A or ventilation efficiency were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. The values of a and b were 0 < a < 1 and 1 < b < 2 and were different for three conditions at both frequencies. [Formula: see text] A and ventilation efficiency were highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges at both frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: In this lung model study, ventilation characteristics were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. Ventilation efficiency was highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40635-019-0229-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.