Cargando…

Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study

BACKGROUND: Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS. These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used and their different settings, including ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yumoto, Tetsuya, Fujita, Takahisa, Asaba, Sunao, Kanazawa, Shunsuke, Nishimatsu, Atsunori, Yamanouchi, Hideo, Nakagawa, Satoshi, Nagano, Osamu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0229-2
_version_ 1783403987507085312
author Yumoto, Tetsuya
Fujita, Takahisa
Asaba, Sunao
Kanazawa, Shunsuke
Nishimatsu, Atsunori
Yamanouchi, Hideo
Nakagawa, Satoshi
Nagano, Osamu
author_facet Yumoto, Tetsuya
Fujita, Takahisa
Asaba, Sunao
Kanazawa, Shunsuke
Nishimatsu, Atsunori
Yamanouchi, Hideo
Nakagawa, Satoshi
Nagano, Osamu
author_sort Yumoto, Tetsuya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS. These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used and their different settings, including inspiratory time % (IT%). The aims of this study were to obtain basic data about the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators and to elucidate the effect of the oscillator and IT% on ventilation efficiency. METHODS: The Metran R100 or SensorMedics 3100B was connected to an original lung model internally equipped with a simulated bronchial tree. The actual stroke volume (aSV) was measured with a flow sensor placed at the Y-piece. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) was continuously insufflated into the lung model ([Formula: see text] CO(2)), and the partial pressure of CO(2) (PCO(2)) in the lung model was monitored. Alveolar ventilation ([Formula: see text] A; L/min) was estimated as [Formula: see text] CO(2) divided by the stabilized value of PCO(2). [Formula: see text] A was evaluated with several stroke volume settings in the R100 (IT = 50%) or several airway pressure amplitude settings in the 3100B (IT = 33%, 50%) at a frequency of 6 and 8 Hz, a mean airway pressure of 25 cmH(2)O, and a bias flow of 30 L/min. Assuming that [Formula: see text] A = frequency(a) × aSV(b), values of a and b were determined. Ventilation efficiency was calculated as [Formula: see text] A divided by actual minute ventilation. RESULTS: The relationship between aSV and [Formula: see text] A or ventilation efficiency were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. The values of a and b were 0 < a < 1 and 1 < b < 2 and were different for three conditions at both frequencies. [Formula: see text] A and ventilation efficiency were highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges at both frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: In this lung model study, ventilation characteristics were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. Ventilation efficiency was highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40635-019-0229-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64196512019-04-05 Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study Yumoto, Tetsuya Fujita, Takahisa Asaba, Sunao Kanazawa, Shunsuke Nishimatsu, Atsunori Yamanouchi, Hideo Nakagawa, Satoshi Nagano, Osamu Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: Two recent large randomized controlled trials did not show the superiority of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in adults with ARDS. These two trials had differing results, and possible causes could be the different oscillators used and their different settings, including inspiratory time % (IT%). The aims of this study were to obtain basic data about the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators and to elucidate the effect of the oscillator and IT% on ventilation efficiency. METHODS: The Metran R100 or SensorMedics 3100B was connected to an original lung model internally equipped with a simulated bronchial tree. The actual stroke volume (aSV) was measured with a flow sensor placed at the Y-piece. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) was continuously insufflated into the lung model ([Formula: see text] CO(2)), and the partial pressure of CO(2) (PCO(2)) in the lung model was monitored. Alveolar ventilation ([Formula: see text] A; L/min) was estimated as [Formula: see text] CO(2) divided by the stabilized value of PCO(2). [Formula: see text] A was evaluated with several stroke volume settings in the R100 (IT = 50%) or several airway pressure amplitude settings in the 3100B (IT = 33%, 50%) at a frequency of 6 and 8 Hz, a mean airway pressure of 25 cmH(2)O, and a bias flow of 30 L/min. Assuming that [Formula: see text] A = frequency(a) × aSV(b), values of a and b were determined. Ventilation efficiency was calculated as [Formula: see text] A divided by actual minute ventilation. RESULTS: The relationship between aSV and [Formula: see text] A or ventilation efficiency were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. The values of a and b were 0 < a < 1 and 1 < b < 2 and were different for three conditions at both frequencies. [Formula: see text] A and ventilation efficiency were highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges at both frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: In this lung model study, ventilation characteristics were different depending on the oscillator and IT%. Ventilation efficiency was highest with R100 (IT = 50%) and lowest with 3100B (IT = 33%) for high aSV ranges. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40635-019-0229-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6419651/ /pubmed/30868327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0229-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Yumoto, Tetsuya
Fujita, Takahisa
Asaba, Sunao
Kanazawa, Shunsuke
Nishimatsu, Atsunori
Yamanouchi, Hideo
Nakagawa, Satoshi
Nagano, Osamu
Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study
title Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study
title_full Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study
title_fullStr Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study
title_short Comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study
title_sort comparison of the ventilation characteristics in two adult oscillators: a lung model study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30868327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0229-2
work_keys_str_mv AT yumototetsuya comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy
AT fujitatakahisa comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy
AT asabasunao comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy
AT kanazawashunsuke comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy
AT nishimatsuatsunori comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy
AT yamanouchihideo comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy
AT nakagawasatoshi comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy
AT naganoosamu comparisonoftheventilationcharacteristicsintwoadultoscillatorsalungmodelstudy