Cargando…
Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases
AIMS: To perform a dosimetric evaluation of four different simultaneous integrated boost whole brain radiotherapy modalities with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance in the treatment of limited brain metastases. METHODS: Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging data of 10 patients with limited...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30876444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1255-7 |
_version_ | 1783404001837973504 |
---|---|
author | Jiang, Aijun Sun, Weipeng Zhao, Fen Wu, Zhenxuan Shang, Dongping Yu, Qingxi Wang, Suzhen Zhu, Jian Yang, Fengchang Yuan, Shuanghu |
author_facet | Jiang, Aijun Sun, Weipeng Zhao, Fen Wu, Zhenxuan Shang, Dongping Yu, Qingxi Wang, Suzhen Zhu, Jian Yang, Fengchang Yuan, Shuanghu |
author_sort | Jiang, Aijun |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To perform a dosimetric evaluation of four different simultaneous integrated boost whole brain radiotherapy modalities with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance in the treatment of limited brain metastases. METHODS: Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging data of 10 patients with limited (1–5) brain metastases were used to replan step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT), dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (Tomo). The prescribed doses of 40–50 Gy in 10 fractions and 30 Gy in 10 fractions were simultaneously delivered to the metastatic lesions and the whole-brain volume, respectively. The hippocampal dose met the RTOG 0933 criteria for hippocampal avoidance (Dmax ≤17 Gy, D100% ≤10 Gy). The inner ear dose was restrained to Dmean ≤15 Gy. Target coverage (TC), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), maximum dose (Dmax), minimum dose (Dmin) and dose to organs at risk (OARs) were compared. RESULTS: All plans met the indicated dose restrictions. The mean percentage of planning target volume of metastases (PTVmets) coverage ranged from 97.1 to 99.4%. For planning target volume of brain (PTVbrain), Tomo provided the lowest average D2% (37.5 ± 2.8 Gy), the highest average D98% (25.2 ± 2.0 Gy), and the best TC (92.6% ± 2.1%) and CI (0.79 ± 0.06). The two fixed gantry IMRT modalities (step and shot, dynamic) provided similar PTVbrain dose homogeneity (both 0.76). Significant differences across the four approaches were observed for the maximum and minimum doses to the hippocampus and the maximum doses to the eyes, lens and optic nerves. CONCLUSION: All four radiotherapy modalities produced acceptable treatment plans with good avoidance of the hippocampus and inner ear. Tomo obtained satisfactory PTVbrain coverage and the best homogeneity index. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03414944. Registered 29 January 2018 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6419811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64198112019-03-28 Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases Jiang, Aijun Sun, Weipeng Zhao, Fen Wu, Zhenxuan Shang, Dongping Yu, Qingxi Wang, Suzhen Zhu, Jian Yang, Fengchang Yuan, Shuanghu Radiat Oncol Research AIMS: To perform a dosimetric evaluation of four different simultaneous integrated boost whole brain radiotherapy modalities with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance in the treatment of limited brain metastases. METHODS: Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging data of 10 patients with limited (1–5) brain metastases were used to replan step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (sIMRT), dynamic intensity-modulated radiation therapy (dIMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (Tomo). The prescribed doses of 40–50 Gy in 10 fractions and 30 Gy in 10 fractions were simultaneously delivered to the metastatic lesions and the whole-brain volume, respectively. The hippocampal dose met the RTOG 0933 criteria for hippocampal avoidance (Dmax ≤17 Gy, D100% ≤10 Gy). The inner ear dose was restrained to Dmean ≤15 Gy. Target coverage (TC), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), maximum dose (Dmax), minimum dose (Dmin) and dose to organs at risk (OARs) were compared. RESULTS: All plans met the indicated dose restrictions. The mean percentage of planning target volume of metastases (PTVmets) coverage ranged from 97.1 to 99.4%. For planning target volume of brain (PTVbrain), Tomo provided the lowest average D2% (37.5 ± 2.8 Gy), the highest average D98% (25.2 ± 2.0 Gy), and the best TC (92.6% ± 2.1%) and CI (0.79 ± 0.06). The two fixed gantry IMRT modalities (step and shot, dynamic) provided similar PTVbrain dose homogeneity (both 0.76). Significant differences across the four approaches were observed for the maximum and minimum doses to the hippocampus and the maximum doses to the eyes, lens and optic nerves. CONCLUSION: All four radiotherapy modalities produced acceptable treatment plans with good avoidance of the hippocampus and inner ear. Tomo obtained satisfactory PTVbrain coverage and the best homogeneity index. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03414944. Registered 29 January 2018 BioMed Central 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6419811/ /pubmed/30876444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1255-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Jiang, Aijun Sun, Weipeng Zhao, Fen Wu, Zhenxuan Shang, Dongping Yu, Qingxi Wang, Suzhen Zhu, Jian Yang, Fengchang Yuan, Shuanghu Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases |
title | Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases |
title_full | Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases |
title_short | Dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases |
title_sort | dosimetric evaluation of four whole brain radiation therapy approaches with hippocampus and inner ear avoidance and simultaneous integrated boost for limited brain metastases |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30876444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1255-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiangaijun dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT sunweipeng dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT zhaofen dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT wuzhenxuan dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT shangdongping dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT yuqingxi dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT wangsuzhen dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT zhujian dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT yangfengchang dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases AT yuanshuanghu dosimetricevaluationoffourwholebrainradiationtherapyapproacheswithhippocampusandinnerearavoidanceandsimultaneousintegratedboostforlimitedbrainmetastases |