Cargando…

The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia

BACKGROUND: Interviewers can substantially affect self-reported data. This may be due to random variation in interviewers’ ability to put respondents at ease or in how they frame questions. It may also be due to systematic differences such as social distance between interviewer and respondent (e.g.,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harling, Guy, Chanda, Michael M., Ortblad, Katrina F., Mwale, Magdalene, Chongo, Steven, Kanchele, Catherine, Kamungoma, Nyambe, Barresi, Leah G., Bärnighausen, Till, Oldenburg, Catherine E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30876402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0703-2
_version_ 1783404004244455424
author Harling, Guy
Chanda, Michael M.
Ortblad, Katrina F.
Mwale, Magdalene
Chongo, Steven
Kanchele, Catherine
Kamungoma, Nyambe
Barresi, Leah G.
Bärnighausen, Till
Oldenburg, Catherine E.
author_facet Harling, Guy
Chanda, Michael M.
Ortblad, Katrina F.
Mwale, Magdalene
Chongo, Steven
Kanchele, Catherine
Kamungoma, Nyambe
Barresi, Leah G.
Bärnighausen, Till
Oldenburg, Catherine E.
author_sort Harling, Guy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Interviewers can substantially affect self-reported data. This may be due to random variation in interviewers’ ability to put respondents at ease or in how they frame questions. It may also be due to systematic differences such as social distance between interviewer and respondent (e.g., by age, gender, ethnicity) or different perceptions of what interviewers consider socially desirable responses. Exploration of such variation is limited, especially in stigmatized populations. METHODS: We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of HIV self-testing amongst 965 female sex workers (FSWs) in Zambian towns. In the trial, 16 interviewers were randomly assigned to respondents. We used hierarchical regression models to examine how interviewers may both affect responses on more and less sensitive topics, and confound associations between key risk factors and HIV self-test use. RESULTS: Model variance (ICC) at the interviewer level was over 15% for most topics. ICC was lower for socio-demographic and cognitively simple questions, and highest for sexual behaviour, substance use, violence and psychosocial wellbeing questions. Respondents reported significantly lower socioeconomic status and more sex-work related violence to female interviewers. Not accounting for interviewer identity in regressions predicting HIV self-test behaviour led to coefficients moving from non-significant to significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial interviewer-level effects for prevalence and associational outcomes among Zambian FSWs, particularly for sensitive questions. Our findings highlight the importance of careful training and response monitoring to minimize inter-interviewer variation, of considering social distance when selecting interviewers and of evaluating whether interviewers are driving key findings in self-reported data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02827240. Registered 11 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0703-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64198212019-03-28 The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia Harling, Guy Chanda, Michael M. Ortblad, Katrina F. Mwale, Magdalene Chongo, Steven Kanchele, Catherine Kamungoma, Nyambe Barresi, Leah G. Bärnighausen, Till Oldenburg, Catherine E. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Interviewers can substantially affect self-reported data. This may be due to random variation in interviewers’ ability to put respondents at ease or in how they frame questions. It may also be due to systematic differences such as social distance between interviewer and respondent (e.g., by age, gender, ethnicity) or different perceptions of what interviewers consider socially desirable responses. Exploration of such variation is limited, especially in stigmatized populations. METHODS: We analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial of HIV self-testing amongst 965 female sex workers (FSWs) in Zambian towns. In the trial, 16 interviewers were randomly assigned to respondents. We used hierarchical regression models to examine how interviewers may both affect responses on more and less sensitive topics, and confound associations between key risk factors and HIV self-test use. RESULTS: Model variance (ICC) at the interviewer level was over 15% for most topics. ICC was lower for socio-demographic and cognitively simple questions, and highest for sexual behaviour, substance use, violence and psychosocial wellbeing questions. Respondents reported significantly lower socioeconomic status and more sex-work related violence to female interviewers. Not accounting for interviewer identity in regressions predicting HIV self-test behaviour led to coefficients moving from non-significant to significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial interviewer-level effects for prevalence and associational outcomes among Zambian FSWs, particularly for sensitive questions. Our findings highlight the importance of careful training and response monitoring to minimize inter-interviewer variation, of considering social distance when selecting interviewers and of evaluating whether interviewers are driving key findings in self-reported data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02827240. Registered 11 July 2016. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-019-0703-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6419821/ /pubmed/30876402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0703-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harling, Guy
Chanda, Michael M.
Ortblad, Katrina F.
Mwale, Magdalene
Chongo, Steven
Kanchele, Catherine
Kamungoma, Nyambe
Barresi, Leah G.
Bärnighausen, Till
Oldenburg, Catherine E.
The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
title The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
title_full The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
title_fullStr The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
title_full_unstemmed The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
title_short The influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in Zambia
title_sort influence of interviewers on survey responses among female sex workers in zambia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30876402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0703-2
work_keys_str_mv AT harlingguy theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT chandamichaelm theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT ortbladkatrinaf theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT mwalemagdalene theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT chongosteven theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT kanchelecatherine theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT kamungomanyambe theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT barresileahg theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT barnighausentill theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT oldenburgcatherinee theinfluenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT harlingguy influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT chandamichaelm influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT ortbladkatrinaf influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT mwalemagdalene influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT chongosteven influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT kanchelecatherine influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT kamungomanyambe influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT barresileahg influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT barnighausentill influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia
AT oldenburgcatherinee influenceofinterviewersonsurveyresponsesamongfemalesexworkersinzambia