Cargando…

Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Overlooking other conditions during cancer could undermine gains associated with early detection and improved cancer treatment. We conducted a systematic review on the quality of diabetes care in cancer. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches of Medline and Embase, from 1996 to present, were con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffiths, Robert I, Keating, Nancy L, Bankhead, Clare R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy124
_version_ 1783404022649061376
author Griffiths, Robert I
Keating, Nancy L
Bankhead, Clare R
author_facet Griffiths, Robert I
Keating, Nancy L
Bankhead, Clare R
author_sort Griffiths, Robert I
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Overlooking other conditions during cancer could undermine gains associated with early detection and improved cancer treatment. We conducted a systematic review on the quality of diabetes care in cancer. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches of Medline and Embase, from 1996 to present, were conducted to identify studies on the quality of diabetes care in patients diagnosed with cancer. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: longitudinal or cross-sectional observational study; population consisted of diabetes patients; exposure consisted of cancer of any type and outcomes consisted of diabetes quality of care indicators, including healthcare visits, monitoring and testing, control of biologic parameters, or use of diabetes and other related medications. DATA EXTRACTION: Structured data collection forms were developed to extract information on the study design and four types of quality indicators: physician visits, exams or diabetes education (collectively ‘healthcare visits’); monitoring and testing; control of biologic parameters; and medication use and adherence. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: There were 15 studies from five countries. There was no consistent evidence that cancer was associated with fewer healthcare visits, lower monitoring and testing of biologic parameters or poorer control of biologic parameters, including glucose. However, the weight of the evidence suggests cancer was associated with lower adherence to diabetes medications and other medications, such as anti-hypertensives and cholesterol-lowering agents. CONCLUSION: Evidence indicates cancer is associated with poorer adherence to diabetes and other medications. Further primary research could clarify cancer’s impact on other diabetes quality indicators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64199052019-03-20 Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review Griffiths, Robert I Keating, Nancy L Bankhead, Clare R Int J Qual Health Care Review Article PURPOSE: Overlooking other conditions during cancer could undermine gains associated with early detection and improved cancer treatment. We conducted a systematic review on the quality of diabetes care in cancer. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches of Medline and Embase, from 1996 to present, were conducted to identify studies on the quality of diabetes care in patients diagnosed with cancer. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected if they met the following criteria: longitudinal or cross-sectional observational study; population consisted of diabetes patients; exposure consisted of cancer of any type and outcomes consisted of diabetes quality of care indicators, including healthcare visits, monitoring and testing, control of biologic parameters, or use of diabetes and other related medications. DATA EXTRACTION: Structured data collection forms were developed to extract information on the study design and four types of quality indicators: physician visits, exams or diabetes education (collectively ‘healthcare visits’); monitoring and testing; control of biologic parameters; and medication use and adherence. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: There were 15 studies from five countries. There was no consistent evidence that cancer was associated with fewer healthcare visits, lower monitoring and testing of biologic parameters or poorer control of biologic parameters, including glucose. However, the weight of the evidence suggests cancer was associated with lower adherence to diabetes medications and other medications, such as anti-hypertensives and cholesterol-lowering agents. CONCLUSION: Evidence indicates cancer is associated with poorer adherence to diabetes and other medications. Further primary research could clarify cancer’s impact on other diabetes quality indicators. Oxford University Press 2019-03 2018-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6419905/ /pubmed/29912446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy124 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Griffiths, Robert I
Keating, Nancy L
Bankhead, Clare R
Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
title Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
title_full Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
title_fullStr Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
title_short Quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
title_sort quality of diabetes care in cancer: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29912446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzy124
work_keys_str_mv AT griffithsroberti qualityofdiabetescareincancerasystematicreview
AT keatingnancyl qualityofdiabetescareincancerasystematicreview
AT bankheadclarer qualityofdiabetescareincancerasystematicreview