Cargando…

Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity

During Pavlovian conditioning, if a cue (e.g., lever extension) predicts reward delivery in a different location (e.g., a food magazine), some individuals will come to approach and interact with the cue, a behavior known as sign tracking (ST), and others will approach the site of reward, a behavior...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillis, Zachary S., Morrison, Sara E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society for Neuroscience 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0414-18.2019
_version_ 1783404038432227328
author Gillis, Zachary S.
Morrison, Sara E.
author_facet Gillis, Zachary S.
Morrison, Sara E.
author_sort Gillis, Zachary S.
collection PubMed
description During Pavlovian conditioning, if a cue (e.g., lever extension) predicts reward delivery in a different location (e.g., a food magazine), some individuals will come to approach and interact with the cue, a behavior known as sign tracking (ST), and others will approach the site of reward, a behavior known as goal tracking (GT). In rats, the acquisition of ST versus GT behavior is associated with distinct profiles of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), but it is unknown whether it is associated with different patterns of accumbens neural activity. Therefore, we recorded from individual neurons in the NAc core during the acquisition, maintenance, and extinction of ST and GT behavior. Even though NAc dopamine is specifically important for the acquisition and expression of ST, we found that cue-evoked excitatory responses encode the vigor of both ST and GT behavior. In contrast, among sign trackers only, there was a prominent decrease in reward-related activity over the course of training, which may reflect the decreasing reward prediction error encoded by phasic dopamine. Finally, both behavior and cue-evoked activity were relatively resistant to extinction in sign trackers, as compared with goal trackers, although a subset of neurons in both groups retained their cue-evoked responses. Overall, the results point to the convergence of multiple forms of reward learning in the NAc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6419996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Society for Neuroscience
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64199962019-03-18 Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity Gillis, Zachary S. Morrison, Sara E. eNeuro New Research During Pavlovian conditioning, if a cue (e.g., lever extension) predicts reward delivery in a different location (e.g., a food magazine), some individuals will come to approach and interact with the cue, a behavior known as sign tracking (ST), and others will approach the site of reward, a behavior known as goal tracking (GT). In rats, the acquisition of ST versus GT behavior is associated with distinct profiles of dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), but it is unknown whether it is associated with different patterns of accumbens neural activity. Therefore, we recorded from individual neurons in the NAc core during the acquisition, maintenance, and extinction of ST and GT behavior. Even though NAc dopamine is specifically important for the acquisition and expression of ST, we found that cue-evoked excitatory responses encode the vigor of both ST and GT behavior. In contrast, among sign trackers only, there was a prominent decrease in reward-related activity over the course of training, which may reflect the decreasing reward prediction error encoded by phasic dopamine. Finally, both behavior and cue-evoked activity were relatively resistant to extinction in sign trackers, as compared with goal trackers, although a subset of neurons in both groups retained their cue-evoked responses. Overall, the results point to the convergence of multiple forms of reward learning in the NAc. Society for Neuroscience 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6419996/ /pubmed/30886890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0414-18.2019 Text en Copyright © 2019 Gillis and Morrison http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle New Research
Gillis, Zachary S.
Morrison, Sara E.
Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity
title Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity
title_full Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity
title_fullStr Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity
title_full_unstemmed Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity
title_short Sign Tracking and Goal Tracking Are Characterized by Distinct Patterns of Nucleus Accumbens Activity
title_sort sign tracking and goal tracking are characterized by distinct patterns of nucleus accumbens activity
topic New Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6419996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0414-18.2019
work_keys_str_mv AT gilliszacharys signtrackingandgoaltrackingarecharacterizedbydistinctpatternsofnucleusaccumbensactivity
AT morrisonsarae signtrackingandgoaltrackingarecharacterizedbydistinctpatternsofnucleusaccumbensactivity