Cargando…

Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition

The plasticity of the human nervous system allows us to acquire an open-ended repository of sensorimotor skills in adulthood, such as the mastery of tools, musical instruments or sports. How novel sensorimotor skills are learned from scratch is yet largely unknown. In particular, the so-called inver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rohde, Marieke, Narioka, Kenichi, Steil, Jochen J., Klein, Lina K., Ernst, Marc O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30835770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006676
_version_ 1783404045065519104
author Rohde, Marieke
Narioka, Kenichi
Steil, Jochen J.
Klein, Lina K.
Ernst, Marc O.
author_facet Rohde, Marieke
Narioka, Kenichi
Steil, Jochen J.
Klein, Lina K.
Ernst, Marc O.
author_sort Rohde, Marieke
collection PubMed
description The plasticity of the human nervous system allows us to acquire an open-ended repository of sensorimotor skills in adulthood, such as the mastery of tools, musical instruments or sports. How novel sensorimotor skills are learned from scratch is yet largely unknown. In particular, the so-called inverse mapping from goal states to motor states is underdetermined because a goal can often be achieved by many different movements (motor redundancy). How humans learn to resolve motor redundancy and by which principles they explore high-dimensional motor spaces has hardly been investigated. To study this question, we trained human participants in an unfamiliar and redundant visually-guided manual control task. We qualitatively compare the experimental results with simulation results from a population of artificial agents that learned the same task by Goal Babbling, which is an inverse-model learning approach for robotics. In Goal Babbling, goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and thereby enables robots to learn an inverse model directly from scratch, without having to learn a forward model first. In the human experiment, we tested whether different initial conditions (starting positions of the hand) influence the acquisition of motor synergies, which we identified by Principal Component Analysis in the motor space. The results show that the human participants’ solutions are spatially biased towards the different starting positions in motor space and are marked by a gradual co-learning of synergies and task success, similar to the dynamics of motor learning by Goal Babbling. However, there are also differences between human learning and the Goal Babbling simulations, as humans tend to predominantly use Degrees of Freedom that do not have a large effect on the hand position, whereas in Goal Babbling, Degrees of Freedom with a large effect on hand position are used predominantly. We conclude that humans use goal-related feedback to constrain motor exploration and resolve motor redundancy when learning a new sensorimotor mapping, but in a manner that differs from the current implementation of Goal Babbling due to different constraints on motor exploration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6420027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64200272019-04-01 Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition Rohde, Marieke Narioka, Kenichi Steil, Jochen J. Klein, Lina K. Ernst, Marc O. PLoS Comput Biol Research Article The plasticity of the human nervous system allows us to acquire an open-ended repository of sensorimotor skills in adulthood, such as the mastery of tools, musical instruments or sports. How novel sensorimotor skills are learned from scratch is yet largely unknown. In particular, the so-called inverse mapping from goal states to motor states is underdetermined because a goal can often be achieved by many different movements (motor redundancy). How humans learn to resolve motor redundancy and by which principles they explore high-dimensional motor spaces has hardly been investigated. To study this question, we trained human participants in an unfamiliar and redundant visually-guided manual control task. We qualitatively compare the experimental results with simulation results from a population of artificial agents that learned the same task by Goal Babbling, which is an inverse-model learning approach for robotics. In Goal Babbling, goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and thereby enables robots to learn an inverse model directly from scratch, without having to learn a forward model first. In the human experiment, we tested whether different initial conditions (starting positions of the hand) influence the acquisition of motor synergies, which we identified by Principal Component Analysis in the motor space. The results show that the human participants’ solutions are spatially biased towards the different starting positions in motor space and are marked by a gradual co-learning of synergies and task success, similar to the dynamics of motor learning by Goal Babbling. However, there are also differences between human learning and the Goal Babbling simulations, as humans tend to predominantly use Degrees of Freedom that do not have a large effect on the hand position, whereas in Goal Babbling, Degrees of Freedom with a large effect on hand position are used predominantly. We conclude that humans use goal-related feedback to constrain motor exploration and resolve motor redundancy when learning a new sensorimotor mapping, but in a manner that differs from the current implementation of Goal Babbling due to different constraints on motor exploration. Public Library of Science 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6420027/ /pubmed/30835770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006676 Text en © 2019 Rohde et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rohde, Marieke
Narioka, Kenichi
Steil, Jochen J.
Klein, Lina K.
Ernst, Marc O.
Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition
title Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition
title_full Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition
title_fullStr Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition
title_short Goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition
title_sort goal-related feedback guides motor exploration and redundancy resolution in human motor skill acquisition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30835770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006676
work_keys_str_mv AT rohdemarieke goalrelatedfeedbackguidesmotorexplorationandredundancyresolutioninhumanmotorskillacquisition
AT nariokakenichi goalrelatedfeedbackguidesmotorexplorationandredundancyresolutioninhumanmotorskillacquisition
AT steiljochenj goalrelatedfeedbackguidesmotorexplorationandredundancyresolutioninhumanmotorskillacquisition
AT kleinlinak goalrelatedfeedbackguidesmotorexplorationandredundancyresolutioninhumanmotorskillacquisition
AT ernstmarco goalrelatedfeedbackguidesmotorexplorationandredundancyresolutioninhumanmotorskillacquisition