Cargando…

Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage

PURPOSE: Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) induces complex blood flow with increased velocities. Disease assessment is performed with Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), but Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency and DSA by ionizing radiation. An a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov, Hansen, Peter Møller, Ewertsen, Caroline, Lönn, Lars, Jensen, Jørgen Arendt, Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0853-2002
_version_ 1783404073761898496
author Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
Hansen, Peter Møller
Ewertsen, Caroline
Lönn, Lars
Jensen, Jørgen Arendt
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_facet Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
Hansen, Peter Møller
Ewertsen, Caroline
Lönn, Lars
Jensen, Jørgen Arendt
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
author_sort Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) induces complex blood flow with increased velocities. Disease assessment is performed with Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), but Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency and DSA by ionizing radiation. An alternative is the vector flow imaging method based on transverse oscillation (TO), an angle-independent vector velocity technique using ultrasound. In this study, flow complexity and velocity measured with TO were compared with DSA for the assessment of stenosis in the SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vector concentration, a measure of flow complexity, and the velocity ratio obtained from the stenosis and a disease-free adjacent vessel segment, were estimated with TO in 11 patients with a total of 16 stenoses of the SFA. TO data were compared with the corresponding stenosis degree percentage obtained with DSA. RESULTS: The correlation between the vector concentration and DSA was very strong (R=0.93; p<0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81–0.98), while only moderate for velocity ratio and DSA (R=0.50; p<0.07; 95% CI: 0.00–0.80). The correlation coefficients that were found were significantly different (p<0.005) without overlapping CI. CONCLUSION: The study indicated that flow changes in the SFA induced by stenosis can be quantified with TO, and that stenosis grading may be improved by estimation of flow complexity instead of velocity ratio. TO is a potential diagnostic tool for the assessment of atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6420338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher © Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64203382019-03-18 Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen, Peter Møller Ewertsen, Caroline Lönn, Lars Jensen, Jørgen Arendt Nielsen, Michael Bachmann Ultrasound Int Open PURPOSE: Stenosis of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) induces complex blood flow with increased velocities. Disease assessment is performed with Doppler ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), but Doppler ultrasound is limited by angle dependency and DSA by ionizing radiation. An alternative is the vector flow imaging method based on transverse oscillation (TO), an angle-independent vector velocity technique using ultrasound. In this study, flow complexity and velocity measured with TO were compared with DSA for the assessment of stenosis in the SFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The vector concentration, a measure of flow complexity, and the velocity ratio obtained from the stenosis and a disease-free adjacent vessel segment, were estimated with TO in 11 patients with a total of 16 stenoses of the SFA. TO data were compared with the corresponding stenosis degree percentage obtained with DSA. RESULTS: The correlation between the vector concentration and DSA was very strong (R=0.93; p<0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81–0.98), while only moderate for velocity ratio and DSA (R=0.50; p<0.07; 95% CI: 0.00–0.80). The correlation coefficients that were found were significantly different (p<0.005) without overlapping CI. CONCLUSION: The study indicated that flow changes in the SFA induced by stenosis can be quantified with TO, and that stenosis grading may be improved by estimation of flow complexity instead of velocity ratio. TO is a potential diagnostic tool for the assessment of atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-03 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6420338/ /pubmed/30886943 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0853-2002 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hansen, Kristoffer Lindskov
Hansen, Peter Møller
Ewertsen, Caroline
Lönn, Lars
Jensen, Jørgen Arendt
Nielsen, Michael Bachmann
Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage
title Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage
title_full Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage
title_fullStr Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage
title_full_unstemmed Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage
title_short Vector Flow Imaging Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography for Stenosis Assessment in the Superficial Femoral Artery – A Study of Vector Concentration, Velocity Ratio and Stenosis Degree Percentage
title_sort vector flow imaging compared with digital subtraction angiography for stenosis assessment in the superficial femoral artery – a study of vector concentration, velocity ratio and stenosis degree percentage
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886943
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0853-2002
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenkristofferlindskov vectorflowimagingcomparedwithdigitalsubtractionangiographyforstenosisassessmentinthesuperficialfemoralarteryastudyofvectorconcentrationvelocityratioandstenosisdegreepercentage
AT hansenpetermøller vectorflowimagingcomparedwithdigitalsubtractionangiographyforstenosisassessmentinthesuperficialfemoralarteryastudyofvectorconcentrationvelocityratioandstenosisdegreepercentage
AT ewertsencaroline vectorflowimagingcomparedwithdigitalsubtractionangiographyforstenosisassessmentinthesuperficialfemoralarteryastudyofvectorconcentrationvelocityratioandstenosisdegreepercentage
AT lonnlars vectorflowimagingcomparedwithdigitalsubtractionangiographyforstenosisassessmentinthesuperficialfemoralarteryastudyofvectorconcentrationvelocityratioandstenosisdegreepercentage
AT jensenjørgenarendt vectorflowimagingcomparedwithdigitalsubtractionangiographyforstenosisassessmentinthesuperficialfemoralarteryastudyofvectorconcentrationvelocityratioandstenosisdegreepercentage
AT nielsenmichaelbachmann vectorflowimagingcomparedwithdigitalsubtractionangiographyforstenosisassessmentinthesuperficialfemoralarteryastudyofvectorconcentrationvelocityratioandstenosisdegreepercentage