Cargando…
Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method
Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and requires regular monitoring upon diagnosis to ascertain whether the disease is stable or progressing. However, making this determination remains a difficult clinical task. Recently, a novel spatiotemporal boundary detection predic...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37127-z |
_version_ | 1783404106969251840 |
---|---|
author | Berchuck, Samuel I. Mwanza, Jean-Claude Tanna, Angelo P. Budenz, Donald L. Warren, Joshua L. |
author_facet | Berchuck, Samuel I. Mwanza, Jean-Claude Tanna, Angelo P. Budenz, Donald L. Warren, Joshua L. |
author_sort | Berchuck, Samuel I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and requires regular monitoring upon diagnosis to ascertain whether the disease is stable or progressing. However, making this determination remains a difficult clinical task. Recently, a novel spatiotemporal boundary detection predictor of glaucomatous visual field (VF) progression (STBound) was developed. In this work, we explore the ability of STBound to differentiate progressing and non-progressing glaucoma patients in comparison to existing methods. STBound, Spatial PROGgression, and traditional trend-based progression methods (global index (GI) regression, mean regression slope, point-wise linear regression, permutation of pointwise linear regression) were applied to longitudinal VF data from 191 eyes of 91 glaucoma patients. The ability of each method to identify progression was compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC), full/partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC/pAUC), sensitivity, and specificity. STBound offered improved diagnostic ability (AIC: 197.77 vs. 204.11–217.55; AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.63–0.70) and showed no correlation (r: −0.01–0.11; p-values: 0.11–0.93) with the competing methods. STBound combined with GI (the top performing competitor) provided improved performance over all individual metrics and compared to all metrics combined with GI (all p-values < 0.05). STBound may be a valuable diagnostic tool and can be used in conjunction with existing methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6420602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64206022019-03-19 Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method Berchuck, Samuel I. Mwanza, Jean-Claude Tanna, Angelo P. Budenz, Donald L. Warren, Joshua L. Sci Rep Article Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide and requires regular monitoring upon diagnosis to ascertain whether the disease is stable or progressing. However, making this determination remains a difficult clinical task. Recently, a novel spatiotemporal boundary detection predictor of glaucomatous visual field (VF) progression (STBound) was developed. In this work, we explore the ability of STBound to differentiate progressing and non-progressing glaucoma patients in comparison to existing methods. STBound, Spatial PROGgression, and traditional trend-based progression methods (global index (GI) regression, mean regression slope, point-wise linear regression, permutation of pointwise linear regression) were applied to longitudinal VF data from 191 eyes of 91 glaucoma patients. The ability of each method to identify progression was compared using Akaike information criterion (AIC), full/partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC/pAUC), sensitivity, and specificity. STBound offered improved diagnostic ability (AIC: 197.77 vs. 204.11–217.55; AUC: 0.74 vs. 0.63–0.70) and showed no correlation (r: −0.01–0.11; p-values: 0.11–0.93) with the competing methods. STBound combined with GI (the top performing competitor) provided improved performance over all individual metrics and compared to all metrics combined with GI (all p-values < 0.05). STBound may be a valuable diagnostic tool and can be used in conjunction with existing methods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6420602/ /pubmed/30874616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37127-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Berchuck, Samuel I. Mwanza, Jean-Claude Tanna, Angelo P. Budenz, Donald L. Warren, Joshua L. Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method |
title | Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method |
title_full | Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method |
title_fullStr | Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method |
title_short | Improved Detection of Visual Field Progression Using a Spatiotemporal Boundary Detection Method |
title_sort | improved detection of visual field progression using a spatiotemporal boundary detection method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37127-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berchucksamueli improveddetectionofvisualfieldprogressionusingaspatiotemporalboundarydetectionmethod AT mwanzajeanclaude improveddetectionofvisualfieldprogressionusingaspatiotemporalboundarydetectionmethod AT tannaangelop improveddetectionofvisualfieldprogressionusingaspatiotemporalboundarydetectionmethod AT budenzdonaldl improveddetectionofvisualfieldprogressionusingaspatiotemporalboundarydetectionmethod AT warrenjoshual improveddetectionofvisualfieldprogressionusingaspatiotemporalboundarydetectionmethod |