Cargando…

Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work

PURPOSE: To assess: (1) whether work ability and work-functioning instruments can detect relevant changes in their respective parameters following a return to work (RTW) and (2) what proportion of those returning to work show changes in their work ability and work functioning. METHODS: A total of 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Schaaijk, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., Sluiter, J. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01400-z
_version_ 1783404109992296448
author van Schaaijk, A.
Nieuwenhuijsen, K.
Frings-Dresen, M. H. W.
Sluiter, J. K.
author_facet van Schaaijk, A.
Nieuwenhuijsen, K.
Frings-Dresen, M. H. W.
Sluiter, J. K.
author_sort van Schaaijk, A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess: (1) whether work ability and work-functioning instruments can detect relevant changes in their respective parameters following a return to work (RTW) and (2) what proportion of those returning to work show changes in their work ability and work functioning. METHODS: A total of 1073 workers who returned to work after at least 2 weeks of sick leave were invited to fill out three questionnaires in the first 8 weeks after RTW. These consisted of an appraisal of general, physical, and mental/emotional work ability (scores 0–10) and a work-functioning questionnaire (scores 0–100). Minimal Important Change (MIC) was defined to determine the proportion of people, whose scores had changed at weeks 5 and 8 following RTW. The Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) was determined to put the MIC in perspective of measurement error. RESULTS: Of all participants, 235 were eligible for the analysis. All MIC values were below the SDC and thus not suitable for use. The SDC for work ability was 2.2 and 19.9 for work functioning. In the first 5 weeks after RTW, 10–15% showed a relevant, measurable improvement in work ability, and work functioning based on the SDC margins. CONCLUSIONS: Both instruments were unable to identify change after RTW adequately. We can conclude that 10–15% of individuals showed improvement in work ability and work functioning in the first 5 weeks after RTW when SDC is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6420615
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64206152019-04-03 Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work van Schaaijk, A. Nieuwenhuijsen, K. Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. Sluiter, J. K. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article PURPOSE: To assess: (1) whether work ability and work-functioning instruments can detect relevant changes in their respective parameters following a return to work (RTW) and (2) what proportion of those returning to work show changes in their work ability and work functioning. METHODS: A total of 1073 workers who returned to work after at least 2 weeks of sick leave were invited to fill out three questionnaires in the first 8 weeks after RTW. These consisted of an appraisal of general, physical, and mental/emotional work ability (scores 0–10) and a work-functioning questionnaire (scores 0–100). Minimal Important Change (MIC) was defined to determine the proportion of people, whose scores had changed at weeks 5 and 8 following RTW. The Smallest Detectable Change (SDC) was determined to put the MIC in perspective of measurement error. RESULTS: Of all participants, 235 were eligible for the analysis. All MIC values were below the SDC and thus not suitable for use. The SDC for work ability was 2.2 and 19.9 for work functioning. In the first 5 weeks after RTW, 10–15% showed a relevant, measurable improvement in work ability, and work functioning based on the SDC margins. CONCLUSIONS: Both instruments were unable to identify change after RTW adequately. We can conclude that 10–15% of individuals showed improvement in work ability and work functioning in the first 5 weeks after RTW when SDC is used. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-17 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6420615/ /pubmed/30656402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01400-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
van Schaaijk, A.
Nieuwenhuijsen, K.
Frings-Dresen, M. H. W.
Sluiter, J. K.
Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
title Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
title_full Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
title_fullStr Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
title_full_unstemmed Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
title_short Work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
title_sort work ability and work functioning: measuring change in individuals recently returned to work
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420615/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30656402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01400-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vanschaaijka workabilityandworkfunctioningmeasuringchangeinindividualsrecentlyreturnedtowork
AT nieuwenhuijsenk workabilityandworkfunctioningmeasuringchangeinindividualsrecentlyreturnedtowork
AT fringsdresenmhw workabilityandworkfunctioningmeasuringchangeinindividualsrecentlyreturnedtowork
AT sluiterjk workabilityandworkfunctioningmeasuringchangeinindividualsrecentlyreturnedtowork