Cargando…

Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Stroke patients are often affected by arm paresis, have functional impairments and receive help from professional or informal caregivers. Progressive resistance training is a common intervention for functional impairments after paresis. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) showed benefits...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Högg, Susan, Holzgraefe, Manfred, Wingendorf, Insa, Mehrholz, Jan, Herrmann, Christoph, Obermann, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30876438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3261-3
_version_ 1783404137321332736
author Högg, Susan
Holzgraefe, Manfred
Wingendorf, Insa
Mehrholz, Jan
Herrmann, Christoph
Obermann, Mark
author_facet Högg, Susan
Holzgraefe, Manfred
Wingendorf, Insa
Mehrholz, Jan
Herrmann, Christoph
Obermann, Mark
author_sort Högg, Susan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stroke patients are often affected by arm paresis, have functional impairments and receive help from professional or informal caregivers. Progressive resistance training is a common intervention for functional impairments after paresis. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) showed benefits for functional recovery after resistance training. However, there is a lack of evidence for strength training in subacute stroke patients. The aim of this study is to investigate safety and effectiveness of arm strength training in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: We will conduct a prospective, assessor-blinded RCT of people with subacute stroke. We will randomly assign patients to one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio and will use concealed allocation. The intervention group will receive, in addition to standard treatment, high-intensity arm training (three times per week, over three weeks; 60 min each session; with a total of nine additional sessions). The control group will receive, in addition to standard treatment, low-intensity arm training (same quantity, frequency and treatment time as the intervention group). Standard treatment for the affected arm includes mobilisation, stretching, therapeutic positioning, arm and hand motor training, strengthening exercises, mechanical assisted training, functional training and task-oriented training. The primary efficacy endpoint will be grip strength. Secondary outcome measures will be Modified Ashworth Scale, Motricity Index, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper limb, Box and Block Test and Goal Attainment Scale for individual participatory goals. We will measure primary and secondary outcomes with blinded assessors at baseline and immediately after three weeks of additional therapy. Based on our sample size calculation, 78 patients will be recruited from our rehabilitation hospital in two and a half years. Drop-out rates and adverse events will be systematically recorded. DISCUSSION: This study attempts to close the evidence gap for effects of arm strength training in subacute stroke patients. The results of this trial will provide robust evidence for effects and safety of high-intensity arm training for people with stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012484. Registered on 26 May 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3261-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6420769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64207692019-03-28 Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial Högg, Susan Holzgraefe, Manfred Wingendorf, Insa Mehrholz, Jan Herrmann, Christoph Obermann, Mark Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Stroke patients are often affected by arm paresis, have functional impairments and receive help from professional or informal caregivers. Progressive resistance training is a common intervention for functional impairments after paresis. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) showed benefits for functional recovery after resistance training. However, there is a lack of evidence for strength training in subacute stroke patients. The aim of this study is to investigate safety and effectiveness of arm strength training in subacute stroke patients. METHODS: We will conduct a prospective, assessor-blinded RCT of people with subacute stroke. We will randomly assign patients to one of two parallel groups in a 1:1 ratio and will use concealed allocation. The intervention group will receive, in addition to standard treatment, high-intensity arm training (three times per week, over three weeks; 60 min each session; with a total of nine additional sessions). The control group will receive, in addition to standard treatment, low-intensity arm training (same quantity, frequency and treatment time as the intervention group). Standard treatment for the affected arm includes mobilisation, stretching, therapeutic positioning, arm and hand motor training, strengthening exercises, mechanical assisted training, functional training and task-oriented training. The primary efficacy endpoint will be grip strength. Secondary outcome measures will be Modified Ashworth Scale, Motricity Index, Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the upper limb, Box and Block Test and Goal Attainment Scale for individual participatory goals. We will measure primary and secondary outcomes with blinded assessors at baseline and immediately after three weeks of additional therapy. Based on our sample size calculation, 78 patients will be recruited from our rehabilitation hospital in two and a half years. Drop-out rates and adverse events will be systematically recorded. DISCUSSION: This study attempts to close the evidence gap for effects of arm strength training in subacute stroke patients. The results of this trial will provide robust evidence for effects and safety of high-intensity arm training for people with stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00012484. Registered on 26 May 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3261-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6420769/ /pubmed/30876438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3261-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Högg, Susan
Holzgraefe, Manfred
Wingendorf, Insa
Mehrholz, Jan
Herrmann, Christoph
Obermann, Mark
Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort upper limb strength training in subacute stroke patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30876438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3261-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hoggsusan upperlimbstrengthtraininginsubacutestrokepatientsstudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holzgraefemanfred upperlimbstrengthtraininginsubacutestrokepatientsstudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wingendorfinsa upperlimbstrengthtraininginsubacutestrokepatientsstudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mehrholzjan upperlimbstrengthtraininginsubacutestrokepatientsstudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT herrmannchristoph upperlimbstrengthtraininginsubacutestrokepatientsstudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT obermannmark upperlimbstrengthtraininginsubacutestrokepatientsstudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial