Cargando…

Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results

AIM: This study was designed to compare the safety and feasibility of uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) via transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 2 cohorts: 13 cases with already established TFA (from February 2016 t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gjoreski, Aleksandar, Gjoreski, Josif, Nancheva, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Republic of Macedonia 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.163
_version_ 1783404162690580480
author Gjoreski, Aleksandar
Gjoreski, Josif
Nancheva, Andrea
author_facet Gjoreski, Aleksandar
Gjoreski, Josif
Nancheva, Andrea
author_sort Gjoreski, Aleksandar
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was designed to compare the safety and feasibility of uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) via transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 2 cohorts: 13 cases with already established TFA (from February 2016 to September 2018) and the first 11 procedures performed via TRA (from October 2017 to October 2018). Indications for embolization included: heavy menstrual bleedings (n = 18), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 2), pelvic pain (n = 3) and abdominal pain (n = 1). One interventional radiologist and one fellow performed all procedures at one institution. Technical success, procedural time, access site complications as well as feedback from patients were assessed for analysis. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 24/24 cases (100%). Unilateral uterine artery embolisation was performed in 7 cases (29.1%) and bilateral in 17 cases (70.8%). Mean procedure time was 72.4 minutes in TFA group, and 60.3 minutes in the TRA group. Mean fluoroscopy time was 25.3 minutes in the TFA group and 21.1 minutes in the TRA group. Access site-related and overall adverse events did not vary significantly among the study cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: TRA represents a safe and feasible approach for UFE with a comparable safety profile to TFA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6420949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Republic of Macedonia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64209492019-03-20 Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results Gjoreski, Aleksandar Gjoreski, Josif Nancheva, Andrea Open Access Maced J Med Sci Clinical Science AIM: This study was designed to compare the safety and feasibility of uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) via transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for 2 cohorts: 13 cases with already established TFA (from February 2016 to September 2018) and the first 11 procedures performed via TRA (from October 2017 to October 2018). Indications for embolization included: heavy menstrual bleedings (n = 18), lower urinary tract symptoms (n = 2), pelvic pain (n = 3) and abdominal pain (n = 1). One interventional radiologist and one fellow performed all procedures at one institution. Technical success, procedural time, access site complications as well as feedback from patients were assessed for analysis. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 24/24 cases (100%). Unilateral uterine artery embolisation was performed in 7 cases (29.1%) and bilateral in 17 cases (70.8%). Mean procedure time was 72.4 minutes in TFA group, and 60.3 minutes in the TRA group. Mean fluoroscopy time was 25.3 minutes in the TFA group and 21.1 minutes in the TRA group. Access site-related and overall adverse events did not vary significantly among the study cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: TRA represents a safe and feasible approach for UFE with a comparable safety profile to TFA. Republic of Macedonia 2019-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6420949/ /pubmed/30894915 http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.163 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Aleksandar Gjoreski, Josif Gjoreski, Andrea Nancheva. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/CC BY-NC/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Gjoreski, Aleksandar
Gjoreski, Josif
Nancheva, Andrea
Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results
title Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results
title_full Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results
title_fullStr Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results
title_full_unstemmed Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results
title_short Uterine Fibroid Embolization via Transradial versus Transfemoral Arterial Access: Technical Results
title_sort uterine fibroid embolization via transradial versus transfemoral arterial access: technical results
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6420949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30894915
http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.163
work_keys_str_mv AT gjoreskialeksandar uterinefibroidembolizationviatransradialversustransfemoralarterialaccesstechnicalresults
AT gjoreskijosif uterinefibroidembolizationviatransradialversustransfemoralarterialaccesstechnicalresults
AT nanchevaandrea uterinefibroidembolizationviatransradialversustransfemoralarterialaccesstechnicalresults