Cargando…

Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor type in the gastrointestinal system. Presently, various classification systems to prognosticate GISTs have been proposed. AIM: To evaluate the application value of four different risk stratification systems for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Tao, Ye, Liang-Ying, Feng, Xing-Yu, Qiu, Hai-Bo, Zhang, Peng, Luo, Yi-Xin, Yuan, Li-Yi, Chen, Xin-Hua, Hu, Yan-Feng, Liu, Hao, Li, Yong, Tao, Kai-Xiong, Yu, Jiang, Li, Guo-Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i10.1238
_version_ 1783404198814023680
author Chen, Tao
Ye, Liang-Ying
Feng, Xing-Yu
Qiu, Hai-Bo
Zhang, Peng
Luo, Yi-Xin
Yuan, Li-Yi
Chen, Xin-Hua
Hu, Yan-Feng
Liu, Hao
Li, Yong
Tao, Kai-Xiong
Yu, Jiang
Li, Guo-Xin
author_facet Chen, Tao
Ye, Liang-Ying
Feng, Xing-Yu
Qiu, Hai-Bo
Zhang, Peng
Luo, Yi-Xin
Yuan, Li-Yi
Chen, Xin-Hua
Hu, Yan-Feng
Liu, Hao
Li, Yong
Tao, Kai-Xiong
Yu, Jiang
Li, Guo-Xin
author_sort Chen, Tao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor type in the gastrointestinal system. Presently, various classification systems to prognosticate GISTs have been proposed. AIM: To evaluate the application value of four different risk stratification systems for GISTs. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with GISTs and underwent surgical resection at four hospitals from 1998 to 2015 were identified from a database. Risk of recurrence was stratified by the modified National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic nomogram, and the contour maps. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to compare the four abovementioned risk stratification systems based on the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1303 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.77 ± 13.70 yr; 52.3% of the patients were male. The mean follow-up period was 64.91 ± 35.79 mo. Approximately 67.0% the tumors were located in the stomach, and 59.5% were smaller than 5 cm; 67.3% of the patients had a mitotic count ≤ 5/50 high-power fields (HPFs). Thirty-four tumors ruptured before and during surgery. Univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size > 5 cm (P < 0.05), mitotic count > 5/50 HPFs (P < 0.05), non-gastric location (P < 0.05), and tumor rupture (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with increased recurrence rates. According to the ROC curve, the AFIP criteria showed the largest AUC (0.754). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the AFIP criteria were associated with a larger AUC than the NIH modified criteria, the MSKCC nomogram, and the contour maps, which might indicate that the AFIP criteria have better accuracy to support therapeutic decision-making for patients with GISTs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64212382019-03-18 Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study Chen, Tao Ye, Liang-Ying Feng, Xing-Yu Qiu, Hai-Bo Zhang, Peng Luo, Yi-Xin Yuan, Li-Yi Chen, Xin-Hua Hu, Yan-Feng Liu, Hao Li, Yong Tao, Kai-Xiong Yu, Jiang Li, Guo-Xin World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor type in the gastrointestinal system. Presently, various classification systems to prognosticate GISTs have been proposed. AIM: To evaluate the application value of four different risk stratification systems for GISTs. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with GISTs and underwent surgical resection at four hospitals from 1998 to 2015 were identified from a database. Risk of recurrence was stratified by the modified National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic nomogram, and the contour maps. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to compare the four abovementioned risk stratification systems based on the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1303 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.77 ± 13.70 yr; 52.3% of the patients were male. The mean follow-up period was 64.91 ± 35.79 mo. Approximately 67.0% the tumors were located in the stomach, and 59.5% were smaller than 5 cm; 67.3% of the patients had a mitotic count ≤ 5/50 high-power fields (HPFs). Thirty-four tumors ruptured before and during surgery. Univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size > 5 cm (P < 0.05), mitotic count > 5/50 HPFs (P < 0.05), non-gastric location (P < 0.05), and tumor rupture (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with increased recurrence rates. According to the ROC curve, the AFIP criteria showed the largest AUC (0.754). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the AFIP criteria were associated with a larger AUC than the NIH modified criteria, the MSKCC nomogram, and the contour maps, which might indicate that the AFIP criteria have better accuracy to support therapeutic decision-making for patients with GISTs. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-03-14 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6421238/ /pubmed/30886506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i10.1238 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Chen, Tao
Ye, Liang-Ying
Feng, Xing-Yu
Qiu, Hai-Bo
Zhang, Peng
Luo, Yi-Xin
Yuan, Li-Yi
Chen, Xin-Hua
Hu, Yan-Feng
Liu, Hao
Li, Yong
Tao, Kai-Xiong
Yu, Jiang
Li, Guo-Xin
Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study
title Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study
title_full Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study
title_fullStr Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study
title_short Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study
title_sort performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter study
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886506
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i10.1238
work_keys_str_mv AT chentao performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT yeliangying performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT fengxingyu performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT qiuhaibo performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT zhangpeng performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT luoyixin performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT yuanliyi performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT chenxinhua performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT huyanfeng performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT liuhao performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT liyong performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT taokaixiong performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT yujiang performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy
AT liguoxin performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy