Cargando…
Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor type in the gastrointestinal system. Presently, various classification systems to prognosticate GISTs have been proposed. AIM: To evaluate the application value of four different risk stratification systems for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i10.1238 |
_version_ | 1783404198814023680 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Tao Ye, Liang-Ying Feng, Xing-Yu Qiu, Hai-Bo Zhang, Peng Luo, Yi-Xin Yuan, Li-Yi Chen, Xin-Hua Hu, Yan-Feng Liu, Hao Li, Yong Tao, Kai-Xiong Yu, Jiang Li, Guo-Xin |
author_facet | Chen, Tao Ye, Liang-Ying Feng, Xing-Yu Qiu, Hai-Bo Zhang, Peng Luo, Yi-Xin Yuan, Li-Yi Chen, Xin-Hua Hu, Yan-Feng Liu, Hao Li, Yong Tao, Kai-Xiong Yu, Jiang Li, Guo-Xin |
author_sort | Chen, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor type in the gastrointestinal system. Presently, various classification systems to prognosticate GISTs have been proposed. AIM: To evaluate the application value of four different risk stratification systems for GISTs. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with GISTs and underwent surgical resection at four hospitals from 1998 to 2015 were identified from a database. Risk of recurrence was stratified by the modified National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic nomogram, and the contour maps. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to compare the four abovementioned risk stratification systems based on the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1303 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.77 ± 13.70 yr; 52.3% of the patients were male. The mean follow-up period was 64.91 ± 35.79 mo. Approximately 67.0% the tumors were located in the stomach, and 59.5% were smaller than 5 cm; 67.3% of the patients had a mitotic count ≤ 5/50 high-power fields (HPFs). Thirty-four tumors ruptured before and during surgery. Univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size > 5 cm (P < 0.05), mitotic count > 5/50 HPFs (P < 0.05), non-gastric location (P < 0.05), and tumor rupture (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with increased recurrence rates. According to the ROC curve, the AFIP criteria showed the largest AUC (0.754). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the AFIP criteria were associated with a larger AUC than the NIH modified criteria, the MSKCC nomogram, and the contour maps, which might indicate that the AFIP criteria have better accuracy to support therapeutic decision-making for patients with GISTs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6421238 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64212382019-03-18 Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study Chen, Tao Ye, Liang-Ying Feng, Xing-Yu Qiu, Hai-Bo Zhang, Peng Luo, Yi-Xin Yuan, Li-Yi Chen, Xin-Hua Hu, Yan-Feng Liu, Hao Li, Yong Tao, Kai-Xiong Yu, Jiang Li, Guo-Xin World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor type in the gastrointestinal system. Presently, various classification systems to prognosticate GISTs have been proposed. AIM: To evaluate the application value of four different risk stratification systems for GISTs. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with GISTs and underwent surgical resection at four hospitals from 1998 to 2015 were identified from a database. Risk of recurrence was stratified by the modified National Institute of Health (NIH) criteria, the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP) criteria, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic nomogram, and the contour maps. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to compare the four abovementioned risk stratification systems based on the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1303 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 55.77 ± 13.70 yr; 52.3% of the patients were male. The mean follow-up period was 64.91 ± 35.79 mo. Approximately 67.0% the tumors were located in the stomach, and 59.5% were smaller than 5 cm; 67.3% of the patients had a mitotic count ≤ 5/50 high-power fields (HPFs). Thirty-four tumors ruptured before and during surgery. Univariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size > 5 cm (P < 0.05), mitotic count > 5/50 HPFs (P < 0.05), non-gastric location (P < 0.05), and tumor rupture (P < 0.05) were significantly associated with increased recurrence rates. According to the ROC curve, the AFIP criteria showed the largest AUC (0.754). CONCLUSION: According to our data, the AFIP criteria were associated with a larger AUC than the NIH modified criteria, the MSKCC nomogram, and the contour maps, which might indicate that the AFIP criteria have better accuracy to support therapeutic decision-making for patients with GISTs. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-03-14 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6421238/ /pubmed/30886506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i10.1238 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Cohort Study Chen, Tao Ye, Liang-Ying Feng, Xing-Yu Qiu, Hai-Bo Zhang, Peng Luo, Yi-Xin Yuan, Li-Yi Chen, Xin-Hua Hu, Yan-Feng Liu, Hao Li, Yong Tao, Kai-Xiong Yu, Jiang Li, Guo-Xin Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study |
title | Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study |
title_full | Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study |
title_fullStr | Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study |
title_short | Performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A multicenter study |
title_sort | performance of risk stratification systems for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multicenter study |
topic | Retrospective Cohort Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421238/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30886506 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i10.1238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chentao performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT yeliangying performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT fengxingyu performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT qiuhaibo performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT zhangpeng performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT luoyixin performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT yuanliyi performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT chenxinhua performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT huyanfeng performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT liuhao performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT liyong performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT taokaixiong performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT yujiang performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy AT liguoxin performanceofriskstratificationsystemsforgastrointestinalstromaltumorsamulticenterstudy |