Cargando…

Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: There are some differences between clinical features of central giant cell granulomas (CGCGs) and peripheral giant cell granulomas (CGCGs) despite their same microscopic features. The possible role of angiogenesis in this issue is still a matter of debate. PURPOSE: The aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadri, Donia, Shahsavari, Fatemeh, Hezarkhani, Maliheh, Shafizadeh, Maryam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937331
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44557
_version_ 1783404217145229312
author Sadri, Donia
Shahsavari, Fatemeh
Hezarkhani, Maliheh
Shafizadeh, Maryam
author_facet Sadri, Donia
Shahsavari, Fatemeh
Hezarkhani, Maliheh
Shafizadeh, Maryam
author_sort Sadri, Donia
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: There are some differences between clinical features of central giant cell granulomas (CGCGs) and peripheral giant cell granulomas (CGCGs) despite their same microscopic features. The possible role of angiogenesis in this issue is still a matter of debate. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare microvessel density (MVD) between CGCGs and PGCGs of the oral cavity using CD31 and CD34. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 18 PGCGs and 19 CGCGs using a monoclonal antibody against CD34 and CD31. MVD was assessed and compared between the lesions using t-test for statistical analysis. p< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The expression levels of both CD34 and CD31 were significantly higher in CGCGs compared to PGCGs (p< 0.002 and p< 0.001, respectively). Significant differences in MVD assessed by both markers were observed between males and females in PGCGs (p< 0.05), but not CGCGs (p< 0.2). CONCLUSION: The combined evaluation of old- and newly-formed vessels by pan-endothelial cell markers showed differences between CGCGs and PGCGs, supporting the possible vascular-proliferative nature of the former. Whether this difference has a part in their diverse biologic behaviors and the role which pre-existent vessels play in comparison to neo-formed vasculature, requires further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64213302019-04-01 Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas Sadri, Donia Shahsavari, Fatemeh Hezarkhani, Maliheh Shafizadeh, Maryam J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: There are some differences between clinical features of central giant cell granulomas (CGCGs) and peripheral giant cell granulomas (CGCGs) despite their same microscopic features. The possible role of angiogenesis in this issue is still a matter of debate. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare microvessel density (MVD) between CGCGs and PGCGs of the oral cavity using CD31 and CD34. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 18 PGCGs and 19 CGCGs using a monoclonal antibody against CD34 and CD31. MVD was assessed and compared between the lesions using t-test for statistical analysis. p< 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The expression levels of both CD34 and CD31 were significantly higher in CGCGs compared to PGCGs (p< 0.002 and p< 0.001, respectively). Significant differences in MVD assessed by both markers were observed between males and females in PGCGs (p< 0.05), but not CGCGs (p< 0.2). CONCLUSION: The combined evaluation of old- and newly-formed vessels by pan-endothelial cell markers showed differences between CGCGs and PGCGs, supporting the possible vascular-proliferative nature of the former. Whether this difference has a part in their diverse biologic behaviors and the role which pre-existent vessels play in comparison to neo-formed vasculature, requires further investigation. Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6421330/ /pubmed/30937331 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44557 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry Shiraz University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadri, Donia
Shahsavari, Fatemeh
Hezarkhani, Maliheh
Shafizadeh, Maryam
Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas
title Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas
title_full Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas
title_fullStr Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas
title_full_unstemmed Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas
title_short Expression of CD34 and CD31 in Central and Peripheral Giant Cell Granulomas
title_sort expression of cd34 and cd31 in central and peripheral giant cell granulomas
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937331
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2019.44557
work_keys_str_mv AT sadridonia expressionofcd34andcd31incentralandperipheralgiantcellgranulomas
AT shahsavarifatemeh expressionofcd34andcd31incentralandperipheralgiantcellgranulomas
AT hezarkhanimaliheh expressionofcd34andcd31incentralandperipheralgiantcellgranulomas
AT shafizadehmaryam expressionofcd34andcd31incentralandperipheralgiantcellgranulomas