Cargando…

Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs

Using small sets of ancestry informative markers (AIMs) constitutes a cost-effective method to accurately estimate the ancestry proportions of individuals. This study aimed to generate a small and effective number of AIMs from ∼60 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of porcine and estimate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Zuoxiang, Bu, Lina, Qin, Yidi, Peng, Yebo, Yang, Ruifei, Zhao, Yiqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00183
_version_ 1783404219254964224
author Liang, Zuoxiang
Bu, Lina
Qin, Yidi
Peng, Yebo
Yang, Ruifei
Zhao, Yiqiang
author_facet Liang, Zuoxiang
Bu, Lina
Qin, Yidi
Peng, Yebo
Yang, Ruifei
Zhao, Yiqiang
author_sort Liang, Zuoxiang
collection PubMed
description Using small sets of ancestry informative markers (AIMs) constitutes a cost-effective method to accurately estimate the ancestry proportions of individuals. This study aimed to generate a small and effective number of AIMs from ∼60 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of porcine and estimate three ancestry proportions [East China pig (ECHP), South China pig (SCHP), and European commercial pig (EUCP)] from Asian breeds and European domestic breeds. A total of 186 samples of 10 pure breeds were divided into three groups: ECHP, SCHP, and EUCP. Using these samples and a one-vs.-rest SVM classifier, we found that using only seven AIMs could completely separate the three groups. Subsequently, we utilized supervised ADMIXTURE to calculate ancestry proportions and found that the 129 AIMs performed well on ancestry estimates when pseudo admixed individuals were used. Furthermore, another 969 samples of 61 populations were applied to evaluate the performance of the 129 AIMs. We also observed that the 129 AIMs were highly correlated with estimates using ∼60 K SNP data for three ancestry components: ECHP (Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.94), SCHP (r = 0.94), and EUCP (r = 0.99). Our results provided an example of using a small number of pig AIMs for classifications and estimating ancestry proportions with high accuracy and in a cost-effective manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64213392019-03-26 Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs Liang, Zuoxiang Bu, Lina Qin, Yidi Peng, Yebo Yang, Ruifei Zhao, Yiqiang Front Genet Genetics Using small sets of ancestry informative markers (AIMs) constitutes a cost-effective method to accurately estimate the ancestry proportions of individuals. This study aimed to generate a small and effective number of AIMs from ∼60 K single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of porcine and estimate three ancestry proportions [East China pig (ECHP), South China pig (SCHP), and European commercial pig (EUCP)] from Asian breeds and European domestic breeds. A total of 186 samples of 10 pure breeds were divided into three groups: ECHP, SCHP, and EUCP. Using these samples and a one-vs.-rest SVM classifier, we found that using only seven AIMs could completely separate the three groups. Subsequently, we utilized supervised ADMIXTURE to calculate ancestry proportions and found that the 129 AIMs performed well on ancestry estimates when pseudo admixed individuals were used. Furthermore, another 969 samples of 61 populations were applied to evaluate the performance of the 129 AIMs. We also observed that the 129 AIMs were highly correlated with estimates using ∼60 K SNP data for three ancestry components: ECHP (Pearson correlation coefficient (r) = 0.94), SCHP (r = 0.94), and EUCP (r = 0.99). Our results provided an example of using a small number of pig AIMs for classifications and estimating ancestry proportions with high accuracy and in a cost-effective manner. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6421339/ /pubmed/30915106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00183 Text en Copyright © 2019 Liang, Bu, Qin, Peng, Yang and Zhao. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Genetics
Liang, Zuoxiang
Bu, Lina
Qin, Yidi
Peng, Yebo
Yang, Ruifei
Zhao, Yiqiang
Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs
title Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs
title_full Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs
title_fullStr Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs
title_full_unstemmed Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs
title_short Selection of Optimal Ancestry Informative Markers for Classification and Ancestry Proportion Estimation in Pigs
title_sort selection of optimal ancestry informative markers for classification and ancestry proportion estimation in pigs
topic Genetics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00183
work_keys_str_mv AT liangzuoxiang selectionofoptimalancestryinformativemarkersforclassificationandancestryproportionestimationinpigs
AT bulina selectionofoptimalancestryinformativemarkersforclassificationandancestryproportionestimationinpigs
AT qinyidi selectionofoptimalancestryinformativemarkersforclassificationandancestryproportionestimationinpigs
AT pengyebo selectionofoptimalancestryinformativemarkersforclassificationandancestryproportionestimationinpigs
AT yangruifei selectionofoptimalancestryinformativemarkersforclassificationandancestryproportionestimationinpigs
AT zhaoyiqiang selectionofoptimalancestryinformativemarkersforclassificationandancestryproportionestimationinpigs