Cargando…
Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
The global land surface absorbs about a third of anthropogenic emissions each year, due to the difference between two key processes: ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Despite the importance of these two processes, it is not possible to measure either at the ecosystem scale during daytime. Ed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30742107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0809-2 |
_version_ | 1783404219492990976 |
---|---|
author | Keenan, Trevor F. Migliavacca, Mirco Papale, Dario Baldocchi, Dennis Reichstein, Markus Torn, Margaret Wutzler, Thomas |
author_facet | Keenan, Trevor F. Migliavacca, Mirco Papale, Dario Baldocchi, Dennis Reichstein, Markus Torn, Margaret Wutzler, Thomas |
author_sort | Keenan, Trevor F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The global land surface absorbs about a third of anthropogenic emissions each year, due to the difference between two key processes: ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Despite the importance of these two processes, it is not possible to measure either at the ecosystem scale during daytime. Eddy-covariance measurements are widely used as the closest ‘quasi-direct’ ecosystem-scale observation from which to estimate ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Recent research, however, suggests that current estimates may be biased by up to 25%, due to a previously unaccounted-for process: the inhibition of leaf respiration in the light. Yet the extent of inhibition remains debated, and implications for estimates of ecosystem-scale respiration and photosynthesis remain unquantified. Here, we quantify an apparent inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration across the global FLUXNET eddy-covariance network, and identify a pervasive influence that varies by season and ecosystem type. We develop partitioning methods that can detect an apparent ecosystem-scale inhibition of daytime respiration and find that diurnal patterns of ecosystem respiration might be markedly different than previously thought. The results call for the reevaluation of global terrestrial carbon cycle models, and also suggest that current global estimates of photosynthesis and respiration may be biased, some on the order of magnitude of anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6421340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64213402019-09-01 Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration Keenan, Trevor F. Migliavacca, Mirco Papale, Dario Baldocchi, Dennis Reichstein, Markus Torn, Margaret Wutzler, Thomas Nat Ecol Evol Article The global land surface absorbs about a third of anthropogenic emissions each year, due to the difference between two key processes: ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Despite the importance of these two processes, it is not possible to measure either at the ecosystem scale during daytime. Eddy-covariance measurements are widely used as the closest ‘quasi-direct’ ecosystem-scale observation from which to estimate ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Recent research, however, suggests that current estimates may be biased by up to 25%, due to a previously unaccounted-for process: the inhibition of leaf respiration in the light. Yet the extent of inhibition remains debated, and implications for estimates of ecosystem-scale respiration and photosynthesis remain unquantified. Here, we quantify an apparent inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration across the global FLUXNET eddy-covariance network, and identify a pervasive influence that varies by season and ecosystem type. We develop partitioning methods that can detect an apparent ecosystem-scale inhibition of daytime respiration and find that diurnal patterns of ecosystem respiration might be markedly different than previously thought. The results call for the reevaluation of global terrestrial carbon cycle models, and also suggest that current global estimates of photosynthesis and respiration may be biased, some on the order of magnitude of anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions. 2019-02-11 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6421340/ /pubmed/30742107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0809-2 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Keenan, Trevor F. Migliavacca, Mirco Papale, Dario Baldocchi, Dennis Reichstein, Markus Torn, Margaret Wutzler, Thomas Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration |
title | Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration |
title_full | Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration |
title_fullStr | Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration |
title_full_unstemmed | Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration |
title_short | Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration |
title_sort | widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30742107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0809-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keenantrevorf widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration AT migliavaccamirco widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration AT papaledario widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration AT baldocchidennis widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration AT reichsteinmarkus widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration AT tornmargaret widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration AT wutzlerthomas widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration |