Cargando…

Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration

The global land surface absorbs about a third of anthropogenic emissions each year, due to the difference between two key processes: ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Despite the importance of these two processes, it is not possible to measure either at the ecosystem scale during daytime. Ed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keenan, Trevor F., Migliavacca, Mirco, Papale, Dario, Baldocchi, Dennis, Reichstein, Markus, Torn, Margaret, Wutzler, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30742107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0809-2
_version_ 1783404219492990976
author Keenan, Trevor F.
Migliavacca, Mirco
Papale, Dario
Baldocchi, Dennis
Reichstein, Markus
Torn, Margaret
Wutzler, Thomas
author_facet Keenan, Trevor F.
Migliavacca, Mirco
Papale, Dario
Baldocchi, Dennis
Reichstein, Markus
Torn, Margaret
Wutzler, Thomas
author_sort Keenan, Trevor F.
collection PubMed
description The global land surface absorbs about a third of anthropogenic emissions each year, due to the difference between two key processes: ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Despite the importance of these two processes, it is not possible to measure either at the ecosystem scale during daytime. Eddy-covariance measurements are widely used as the closest ‘quasi-direct’ ecosystem-scale observation from which to estimate ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Recent research, however, suggests that current estimates may be biased by up to 25%, due to a previously unaccounted-for process: the inhibition of leaf respiration in the light. Yet the extent of inhibition remains debated, and implications for estimates of ecosystem-scale respiration and photosynthesis remain unquantified. Here, we quantify an apparent inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration across the global FLUXNET eddy-covariance network, and identify a pervasive influence that varies by season and ecosystem type. We develop partitioning methods that can detect an apparent ecosystem-scale inhibition of daytime respiration and find that diurnal patterns of ecosystem respiration might be markedly different than previously thought. The results call for the reevaluation of global terrestrial carbon cycle models, and also suggest that current global estimates of photosynthesis and respiration may be biased, some on the order of magnitude of anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64213402019-09-01 Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration Keenan, Trevor F. Migliavacca, Mirco Papale, Dario Baldocchi, Dennis Reichstein, Markus Torn, Margaret Wutzler, Thomas Nat Ecol Evol Article The global land surface absorbs about a third of anthropogenic emissions each year, due to the difference between two key processes: ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Despite the importance of these two processes, it is not possible to measure either at the ecosystem scale during daytime. Eddy-covariance measurements are widely used as the closest ‘quasi-direct’ ecosystem-scale observation from which to estimate ecosystem photosynthesis and respiration. Recent research, however, suggests that current estimates may be biased by up to 25%, due to a previously unaccounted-for process: the inhibition of leaf respiration in the light. Yet the extent of inhibition remains debated, and implications for estimates of ecosystem-scale respiration and photosynthesis remain unquantified. Here, we quantify an apparent inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration across the global FLUXNET eddy-covariance network, and identify a pervasive influence that varies by season and ecosystem type. We develop partitioning methods that can detect an apparent ecosystem-scale inhibition of daytime respiration and find that diurnal patterns of ecosystem respiration might be markedly different than previously thought. The results call for the reevaluation of global terrestrial carbon cycle models, and also suggest that current global estimates of photosynthesis and respiration may be biased, some on the order of magnitude of anthropogenic fossil fuel emissions. 2019-02-11 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6421340/ /pubmed/30742107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0809-2 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Keenan, Trevor F.
Migliavacca, Mirco
Papale, Dario
Baldocchi, Dennis
Reichstein, Markus
Torn, Margaret
Wutzler, Thomas
Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
title Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
title_full Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
title_fullStr Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
title_full_unstemmed Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
title_short Widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
title_sort widespread inhibition of daytime ecosystem respiration
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30742107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0809-2
work_keys_str_mv AT keenantrevorf widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration
AT migliavaccamirco widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration
AT papaledario widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration
AT baldocchidennis widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration
AT reichsteinmarkus widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration
AT tornmargaret widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration
AT wutzlerthomas widespreadinhibitionofdaytimeecosystemrespiration