Cargando…
Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they?
Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines migh...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343 |
_version_ | 1783404222931271680 |
---|---|
author | Arundel, Catherine James, Sophie Northgraves, Matthew Booth, Alison |
author_facet | Arundel, Catherine James, Sophie Northgraves, Matthew Booth, Alison |
author_sort | Arundel, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6421355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64213552019-03-28 Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they? Arundel, Catherine James, Sophie Northgraves, Matthew Booth, Alison Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article Reporting guidelines help improve the reporting of specific study designs, and clear guidance on the best approaches for developing guidelines is available. The methodological strength, or validation of guidelines is however unclear. This article explores what validation of reporting guidelines might involve, and whether this has been conducted for key reporting guidelines. Elsevier 2019-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6421355/ /pubmed/30923775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Arundel, Catherine James, Sophie Northgraves, Matthew Booth, Alison Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they? |
title | Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they? |
title_full | Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they? |
title_fullStr | Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they? |
title_full_unstemmed | Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they? |
title_short | Study reporting guidelines: How valid are they? |
title_sort | study reporting guidelines: how valid are they? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arundelcatherine studyreportingguidelineshowvalidarethey AT jamessophie studyreportingguidelineshowvalidarethey AT northgravesmatthew studyreportingguidelineshowvalidarethey AT boothalison studyreportingguidelineshowvalidarethey |