Cargando…

Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether including additional metabolic components to the current five-marker system can improve the discriminative validity for diagnosing metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study included data from subjects that had completed at least three health exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Huan-Cheng, Chen, Sheng-Pyng, Yang, Hao-Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518822919
_version_ 1783404228762402816
author Chang, Huan-Cheng
Chen, Sheng-Pyng
Yang, Hao-Jan
author_facet Chang, Huan-Cheng
Chen, Sheng-Pyng
Yang, Hao-Jan
author_sort Chang, Huan-Cheng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine whether including additional metabolic components to the current five-marker system can improve the discriminative validity for diagnosing metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study included data from subjects that had completed at least three health examinations during a 5-year period. The study outcome was the onset of MetS. Sociodemographic and biochemical variables were recorded for all subjects so that the adjusted relative risks (ARRs) could be calculated for 11 metabolic components. Risk scores for the development of MetS based on the ARR values were determined. The sums of the risk scores of different component combinations were used to conduct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of MetS diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 3368 individuals with complete data was analysed. The ARRs of the 11 metabolic components were all statistically significant. According to ROC analysis, although good discriminative validity (area under the curve [AUC] range, 0.954–0.976) could be achieved for MetS diagnosis by using either all 11 or combinations of six metabolic components (the five current components plus one extra component), the current five metabolic components used for diagnosis had the best discriminative validity (AUC = 0.977). CONCLUSION: The current five metabolic components used for the diagnosis of MetS still represent the best combination with the highest discriminative validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64213812019-03-22 Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach Chang, Huan-Cheng Chen, Sheng-Pyng Yang, Hao-Jan J Int Med Res Pre-Clinical Research Reports OBJECTIVE: To examine whether including additional metabolic components to the current five-marker system can improve the discriminative validity for diagnosing metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study included data from subjects that had completed at least three health examinations during a 5-year period. The study outcome was the onset of MetS. Sociodemographic and biochemical variables were recorded for all subjects so that the adjusted relative risks (ARRs) could be calculated for 11 metabolic components. Risk scores for the development of MetS based on the ARR values were determined. The sums of the risk scores of different component combinations were used to conduct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of MetS diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 3368 individuals with complete data was analysed. The ARRs of the 11 metabolic components were all statistically significant. According to ROC analysis, although good discriminative validity (area under the curve [AUC] range, 0.954–0.976) could be achieved for MetS diagnosis by using either all 11 or combinations of six metabolic components (the five current components plus one extra component), the current five metabolic components used for diagnosis had the best discriminative validity (AUC = 0.977). CONCLUSION: The current five metabolic components used for the diagnosis of MetS still represent the best combination with the highest discriminative validity. SAGE Publications 2019-01-24 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6421381/ /pubmed/30678504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518822919 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Pre-Clinical Research Reports
Chang, Huan-Cheng
Chen, Sheng-Pyng
Yang, Hao-Jan
Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach
title Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach
title_full Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach
title_fullStr Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach
title_full_unstemmed Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach
title_short Including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach
title_sort including selective metabolic components in current diagnostic criteria does not improve discriminative validity for metabolic syndrome: a risk score approach
topic Pre-Clinical Research Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30678504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060518822919
work_keys_str_mv AT changhuancheng includingselectivemetaboliccomponentsincurrentdiagnosticcriteriadoesnotimprovediscriminativevalidityformetabolicsyndromeariskscoreapproach
AT chenshengpyng includingselectivemetaboliccomponentsincurrentdiagnosticcriteriadoesnotimprovediscriminativevalidityformetabolicsyndromeariskscoreapproach
AT yanghaojan includingselectivemetaboliccomponentsincurrentdiagnosticcriteriadoesnotimprovediscriminativevalidityformetabolicsyndromeariskscoreapproach