Cargando…
Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
Objective. To compare one-year results of vision, corneal aberrometry and contrast sensitivity (CS) in low light conditions between 5- and 10-minute accelerated cross-linking (CXL) protocols. Methods. Thirty eyes were evaluated in each studied group. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Romanian Society of Ophthalmology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30891522 |
_version_ | 1783404243874480128 |
---|---|
author | Asgari, Soheila Hashemi, Hassan Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Mohamadi, Alireza Mehravaran, Shiva Fotouhi, Akbar |
author_facet | Asgari, Soheila Hashemi, Hassan Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Mohamadi, Alireza Mehravaran, Shiva Fotouhi, Akbar |
author_sort | Asgari, Soheila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To compare one-year results of vision, corneal aberrometry and contrast sensitivity (CS) in low light conditions between 5- and 10-minute accelerated cross-linking (CXL) protocols. Methods. Thirty eyes were evaluated in each studied group. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity by the SC-2000 Snellen chart, corneal higher order aberrations using the OPD Scan III and CS using MonCv3System was tested under mesopic (20 lux) and scotopic (0.5 lux) light conditions at pre-CXL and 6 and 12 months post-CXL. Results. At 12 months, a mean improvement of 0.06±0.22 (22.2%) and 0.02±0.25 logMAR (7.9%) in mesopic UDVA and 0.01±0.13 (14.3%) and 0.07±0.13 logMAR (87.9%) in mesopic CDVA was observed in the 5- and 10-minute groups, respectively. Mean decline in scotopic UDVA was 0.01±0.16 (1.0%) and 0.03±0.17 logMAR (11.9%) and mean improvement in scotopic CDVA was 0.03±0.10 (35.5%) and 0.02±0.07 logMAR (22.2%), respectively. Inter-group differences in the decrease of corneal aberrations were not statistically significant. Among CS variables, only inter-group changes in corrected CS 0.5 to 2.2 was significantly different (all P<0.050). The linear regression analysis showed that these differences were related to baseline values not CXL protocols; corrected CS 0.5 (Pgroup=0.261 and Pbaseline value<0.001), CS 1.1 (Pgroup=0.250 and Pbaseline value<0.001), and CS 2.2 (Pgroup=0.101 and Pbaseline value=0.054). Conclusions. Changing the intensity of UV in cross-linking from 18mW/ cm2 to 9mW/ cm2 does not affect the visual function under low-light conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6421497 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Romanian Society of Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64214972019-03-19 Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2 Asgari, Soheila Hashemi, Hassan Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Mohamadi, Alireza Mehravaran, Shiva Fotouhi, Akbar Rom J Ophthalmol General Articles Objective. To compare one-year results of vision, corneal aberrometry and contrast sensitivity (CS) in low light conditions between 5- and 10-minute accelerated cross-linking (CXL) protocols. Methods. Thirty eyes were evaluated in each studied group. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity by the SC-2000 Snellen chart, corneal higher order aberrations using the OPD Scan III and CS using MonCv3System was tested under mesopic (20 lux) and scotopic (0.5 lux) light conditions at pre-CXL and 6 and 12 months post-CXL. Results. At 12 months, a mean improvement of 0.06±0.22 (22.2%) and 0.02±0.25 logMAR (7.9%) in mesopic UDVA and 0.01±0.13 (14.3%) and 0.07±0.13 logMAR (87.9%) in mesopic CDVA was observed in the 5- and 10-minute groups, respectively. Mean decline in scotopic UDVA was 0.01±0.16 (1.0%) and 0.03±0.17 logMAR (11.9%) and mean improvement in scotopic CDVA was 0.03±0.10 (35.5%) and 0.02±0.07 logMAR (22.2%), respectively. Inter-group differences in the decrease of corneal aberrations were not statistically significant. Among CS variables, only inter-group changes in corrected CS 0.5 to 2.2 was significantly different (all P<0.050). The linear regression analysis showed that these differences were related to baseline values not CXL protocols; corrected CS 0.5 (Pgroup=0.261 and Pbaseline value<0.001), CS 1.1 (Pgroup=0.250 and Pbaseline value<0.001), and CS 2.2 (Pgroup=0.101 and Pbaseline value=0.054). Conclusions. Changing the intensity of UV in cross-linking from 18mW/ cm2 to 9mW/ cm2 does not affect the visual function under low-light conditions. Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6421497/ /pubmed/30891522 Text en ©Romanian Society of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | General Articles Asgari, Soheila Hashemi, Hassan Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Mohamadi, Alireza Mehravaran, Shiva Fotouhi, Akbar Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2 |
title | Low light visual function after accelerated corneal
Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
|
title_full | Low light visual function after accelerated corneal
Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
|
title_fullStr | Low light visual function after accelerated corneal
Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
|
title_full_unstemmed | Low light visual function after accelerated corneal
Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
|
title_short | Low light visual function after accelerated corneal
Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
|
title_sort | low light visual function after accelerated corneal
cross-linking protocols: 18 mw/cm2 vs. 9 mw/cm2 |
topic | General Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421497/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30891522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asgarisoheila lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2 AT hashemihassan lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2 AT jafarzadehpurebrahim lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2 AT mohamadialireza lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2 AT mehravaranshiva lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2 AT fotouhiakbar lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2 |