Cargando…

Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2

Objective. To compare one-year results of vision, corneal aberrometry and contrast sensitivity (CS) in low light conditions between 5- and 10-minute accelerated cross-linking (CXL) protocols. Methods. Thirty eyes were evaluated in each studied group. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asgari, Soheila, Hashemi, Hassan, Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim, Mohamadi, Alireza, Mehravaran, Shiva, Fotouhi, Akbar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30891522
_version_ 1783404243874480128
author Asgari, Soheila
Hashemi, Hassan
Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
Mohamadi, Alireza
Mehravaran, Shiva
Fotouhi, Akbar
author_facet Asgari, Soheila
Hashemi, Hassan
Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
Mohamadi, Alireza
Mehravaran, Shiva
Fotouhi, Akbar
author_sort Asgari, Soheila
collection PubMed
description Objective. To compare one-year results of vision, corneal aberrometry and contrast sensitivity (CS) in low light conditions between 5- and 10-minute accelerated cross-linking (CXL) protocols. Methods. Thirty eyes were evaluated in each studied group. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity by the SC-2000 Snellen chart, corneal higher order aberrations using the OPD Scan III and CS using MonCv3System was tested under mesopic (20 lux) and scotopic (0.5 lux) light conditions at pre-CXL and 6 and 12 months post-CXL. Results. At 12 months, a mean improvement of 0.06±0.22 (22.2%) and 0.02±0.25 logMAR (7.9%) in mesopic UDVA and 0.01±0.13 (14.3%) and 0.07±0.13 logMAR (87.9%) in mesopic CDVA was observed in the 5- and 10-minute groups, respectively. Mean decline in scotopic UDVA was 0.01±0.16 (1.0%) and 0.03±0.17 logMAR (11.9%) and mean improvement in scotopic CDVA was 0.03±0.10 (35.5%) and 0.02±0.07 logMAR (22.2%), respectively. Inter-group differences in the decrease of corneal aberrations were not statistically significant. Among CS variables, only inter-group changes in corrected CS 0.5 to 2.2 was significantly different (all P<0.050). The linear regression analysis showed that these differences were related to baseline values not CXL protocols; corrected CS 0.5 (Pgroup=0.261 and Pbaseline value<0.001), CS 1.1 (Pgroup=0.250 and Pbaseline value<0.001), and CS 2.2 (Pgroup=0.101 and Pbaseline value=0.054). Conclusions. Changing the intensity of UV in cross-linking from 18mW/ cm2 to 9mW/ cm2 does not affect the visual function under low-light conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Romanian Society of Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64214972019-03-19 Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2 Asgari, Soheila Hashemi, Hassan Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim Mohamadi, Alireza Mehravaran, Shiva Fotouhi, Akbar Rom J Ophthalmol General Articles Objective. To compare one-year results of vision, corneal aberrometry and contrast sensitivity (CS) in low light conditions between 5- and 10-minute accelerated cross-linking (CXL) protocols. Methods. Thirty eyes were evaluated in each studied group. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity by the SC-2000 Snellen chart, corneal higher order aberrations using the OPD Scan III and CS using MonCv3System was tested under mesopic (20 lux) and scotopic (0.5 lux) light conditions at pre-CXL and 6 and 12 months post-CXL. Results. At 12 months, a mean improvement of 0.06±0.22 (22.2%) and 0.02±0.25 logMAR (7.9%) in mesopic UDVA and 0.01±0.13 (14.3%) and 0.07±0.13 logMAR (87.9%) in mesopic CDVA was observed in the 5- and 10-minute groups, respectively. Mean decline in scotopic UDVA was 0.01±0.16 (1.0%) and 0.03±0.17 logMAR (11.9%) and mean improvement in scotopic CDVA was 0.03±0.10 (35.5%) and 0.02±0.07 logMAR (22.2%), respectively. Inter-group differences in the decrease of corneal aberrations were not statistically significant. Among CS variables, only inter-group changes in corrected CS 0.5 to 2.2 was significantly different (all P<0.050). The linear regression analysis showed that these differences were related to baseline values not CXL protocols; corrected CS 0.5 (Pgroup=0.261 and Pbaseline value<0.001), CS 1.1 (Pgroup=0.250 and Pbaseline value<0.001), and CS 2.2 (Pgroup=0.101 and Pbaseline value=0.054). Conclusions. Changing the intensity of UV in cross-linking from 18mW/ cm2 to 9mW/ cm2 does not affect the visual function under low-light conditions. Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6421497/ /pubmed/30891522 Text en ©Romanian Society of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle General Articles
Asgari, Soheila
Hashemi, Hassan
Jafarzadehpur, Ebrahim
Mohamadi, Alireza
Mehravaran, Shiva
Fotouhi, Akbar
Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
title Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
title_full Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
title_fullStr Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
title_full_unstemmed Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
title_short Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2
title_sort low light visual function after accelerated corneal cross-linking protocols: 18 mw/cm2 vs. 9 mw/cm2
topic General Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30891522
work_keys_str_mv AT asgarisoheila lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2
AT hashemihassan lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2
AT jafarzadehpurebrahim lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2
AT mohamadialireza lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2
AT mehravaranshiva lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2
AT fotouhiakbar lowlightvisualfunctionafteracceleratedcornealcrosslinkingprotocols18mwcm2vs9mwcm2