Cargando…

Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES: Katakori is a Japanese term for non-specific symptoms including discomfort or dull pain caused by muscle stiffness around the neck through the shoulders and is one of the most frequently reported symptoms in Japan. However, there has been no standardized patient-reported outcome measure...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aoki, Kaori, Hall, Toby, Takasaki, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30906552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312119836617
_version_ 1783404255709757440
author Aoki, Kaori
Hall, Toby
Takasaki, Hiroshi
author_facet Aoki, Kaori
Hall, Toby
Takasaki, Hiroshi
author_sort Aoki, Kaori
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Katakori is a Japanese term for non-specific symptoms including discomfort or dull pain caused by muscle stiffness around the neck through the shoulders and is one of the most frequently reported symptoms in Japan. However, there has been no standardized patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate Katakori severity. This study aimed to investigate the reporting level on validity and reliability of patient-reported outcome measures of Katakori severity. METHOD: A systematic search in ICHUSHI, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed was undertaken from inception to April 2017 without language limitations. Two authors independently undertook screening by inspecting the title and abstract. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) participants with Katakori symptoms, (2) reporting reliability or validity of questionnaire evaluating Katakori severity and (3) published journal articles. Studies that either of the authors retained through the screening process were inspected with full text by the two authors independently to examine eligibility of the study. Any disagreement on eligibility after full-text inspection was resolved by discussion between them. Methodological quality was rated with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. Subsequently, the evidence level of each measurement property was assessed for each questionnaire. The two authors extracted data independently. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion between them. RESULTS: Five questionnaires were identified in five studies. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Scale for Measuring Felt Shoulder Stiffness had the highest level of methodological quality. However, excellent measurement properties were found in only two out of nine criteria. Furthermore, in particular, content validity was not investigated in any measure. CONCLUSION: There is preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Scale for Measuring Felt Shoulder Stiffness; however, much further research is required. Identifying or developing a patient-reported outcome measure with content validity would be a future research agenda.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421599
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64215992019-03-22 Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review Aoki, Kaori Hall, Toby Takasaki, Hiroshi SAGE Open Med Review Paper OBJECTIVES: Katakori is a Japanese term for non-specific symptoms including discomfort or dull pain caused by muscle stiffness around the neck through the shoulders and is one of the most frequently reported symptoms in Japan. However, there has been no standardized patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate Katakori severity. This study aimed to investigate the reporting level on validity and reliability of patient-reported outcome measures of Katakori severity. METHOD: A systematic search in ICHUSHI, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed was undertaken from inception to April 2017 without language limitations. Two authors independently undertook screening by inspecting the title and abstract. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) participants with Katakori symptoms, (2) reporting reliability or validity of questionnaire evaluating Katakori severity and (3) published journal articles. Studies that either of the authors retained through the screening process were inspected with full text by the two authors independently to examine eligibility of the study. Any disagreement on eligibility after full-text inspection was resolved by discussion between them. Methodological quality was rated with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments checklist. Subsequently, the evidence level of each measurement property was assessed for each questionnaire. The two authors extracted data independently. Any disagreement was resolved by discussion between them. RESULTS: Five questionnaires were identified in five studies. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Scale for Measuring Felt Shoulder Stiffness had the highest level of methodological quality. However, excellent measurement properties were found in only two out of nine criteria. Furthermore, in particular, content validity was not investigated in any measure. CONCLUSION: There is preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Scale for Measuring Felt Shoulder Stiffness; however, much further research is required. Identifying or developing a patient-reported outcome measure with content validity would be a future research agenda. SAGE Publications 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6421599/ /pubmed/30906552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312119836617 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Paper
Aoki, Kaori
Hall, Toby
Takasaki, Hiroshi
Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review
title Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review
title_full Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review
title_fullStr Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review
title_short Reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring Katakori severity: A systematic review
title_sort reporting on the level of validity and reliability of questionnaires measuring katakori severity: a systematic review
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30906552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312119836617
work_keys_str_mv AT aokikaori reportingonthelevelofvalidityandreliabilityofquestionnairesmeasuringkatakoriseverityasystematicreview
AT halltoby reportingonthelevelofvalidityandreliabilityofquestionnairesmeasuringkatakoriseverityasystematicreview
AT takasakihiroshi reportingonthelevelofvalidityandreliabilityofquestionnairesmeasuringkatakoriseverityasystematicreview