Cargando…

Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered

BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of epidural analgesia (EDA) in terms of pain control and postoperative convalescence are widely known and led to a frequent use for patients who underwent living donor kidney nephrectomy. The objective of this study was to determine whether general anesthesia (GA)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baar, Wolfgang, Goebel, Ulrich, Buerkle, Hartmut, Jaenigen, Bernd, Kaufmann, Kai, Heinrich, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0713-y
_version_ 1783404269818347520
author Baar, Wolfgang
Goebel, Ulrich
Buerkle, Hartmut
Jaenigen, Bernd
Kaufmann, Kai
Heinrich, Sebastian
author_facet Baar, Wolfgang
Goebel, Ulrich
Buerkle, Hartmut
Jaenigen, Bernd
Kaufmann, Kai
Heinrich, Sebastian
author_sort Baar, Wolfgang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of epidural analgesia (EDA) in terms of pain control and postoperative convalescence are widely known and led to a frequent use for patients who underwent living donor kidney nephrectomy. The objective of this study was to determine whether general anesthesia (GA) plus EDA compared to GA only, administered for living donor nephrectomy has effects on postoperative graft function in recipients. METHODS: In this monocentric, retrospective cohort analysis we analyzed the closed files of all consecutive donor- recipient pairs who underwent living donor kidney transplantations from 2008 to 2017. The outcome variable was delayed graft function (DGF), defined as at least one hemodialysis within seven days postoperatively, once hyperacute rejection, vascular or urinary tract complications were ruled out. Statistical analyses of continuous variables were calculated using the two-tail Student’s t test and Fisher exact test for categorical variables with a significance level of p < 0.05, respectively. RESULTS: The study enclosed 291 consecutive living donor kidney transplantations. 99 kidney donors received epidural analgesia whereas 192 had no epidural analgesia. The groups showed balanced pretransplantational characteristics and comparable donors´ and recipients’ risk factors. 9 out of all 291 recipients needed renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the first 7 days due to delayed graft function; none of these donors received EDA. The observed rate of DGF in recipients whose kidney donors received epidural analgesia was significantly lower (0% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort we observed a significantly lower rate of DGF when epidural analgesia for donor nephrectomy was administered. Due to restrictions of the study design this observation needs further confirmation by prospective studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64216672019-03-28 Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered Baar, Wolfgang Goebel, Ulrich Buerkle, Hartmut Jaenigen, Bernd Kaufmann, Kai Heinrich, Sebastian BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The beneficial effects of epidural analgesia (EDA) in terms of pain control and postoperative convalescence are widely known and led to a frequent use for patients who underwent living donor kidney nephrectomy. The objective of this study was to determine whether general anesthesia (GA) plus EDA compared to GA only, administered for living donor nephrectomy has effects on postoperative graft function in recipients. METHODS: In this monocentric, retrospective cohort analysis we analyzed the closed files of all consecutive donor- recipient pairs who underwent living donor kidney transplantations from 2008 to 2017. The outcome variable was delayed graft function (DGF), defined as at least one hemodialysis within seven days postoperatively, once hyperacute rejection, vascular or urinary tract complications were ruled out. Statistical analyses of continuous variables were calculated using the two-tail Student’s t test and Fisher exact test for categorical variables with a significance level of p < 0.05, respectively. RESULTS: The study enclosed 291 consecutive living donor kidney transplantations. 99 kidney donors received epidural analgesia whereas 192 had no epidural analgesia. The groups showed balanced pretransplantational characteristics and comparable donors´ and recipients’ risk factors. 9 out of all 291 recipients needed renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the first 7 days due to delayed graft function; none of these donors received EDA. The observed rate of DGF in recipients whose kidney donors received epidural analgesia was significantly lower (0% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort we observed a significantly lower rate of DGF when epidural analgesia for donor nephrectomy was administered. Due to restrictions of the study design this observation needs further confirmation by prospective studies. BioMed Central 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6421667/ /pubmed/30885139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0713-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baar, Wolfgang
Goebel, Ulrich
Buerkle, Hartmut
Jaenigen, Bernd
Kaufmann, Kai
Heinrich, Sebastian
Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered
title Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered
title_full Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered
title_fullStr Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered
title_full_unstemmed Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered
title_short Lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered
title_sort lower rate of delayed graft function is observed when epidural analgesia for living donor nephrectomy is administered
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885139
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0713-y
work_keys_str_mv AT baarwolfgang lowerrateofdelayedgraftfunctionisobservedwhenepiduralanalgesiaforlivingdonornephrectomyisadministered
AT goebelulrich lowerrateofdelayedgraftfunctionisobservedwhenepiduralanalgesiaforlivingdonornephrectomyisadministered
AT buerklehartmut lowerrateofdelayedgraftfunctionisobservedwhenepiduralanalgesiaforlivingdonornephrectomyisadministered
AT jaenigenbernd lowerrateofdelayedgraftfunctionisobservedwhenepiduralanalgesiaforlivingdonornephrectomyisadministered
AT kaufmannkai lowerrateofdelayedgraftfunctionisobservedwhenepiduralanalgesiaforlivingdonornephrectomyisadministered
AT heinrichsebastian lowerrateofdelayedgraftfunctionisobservedwhenepiduralanalgesiaforlivingdonornephrectomyisadministered