Cargando…

Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation

BACKGROUND: Aortic regurgitation (AR) and subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction expressed by myocardial deformation imaging are common in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation (ASO). Echocardiographic evaluation is often hampered by reduced aco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Wijk, W. H. S., Breur, J. M. P. J., Westenberg, J. J. M., Driessen, M. M. P., Meijboom, F. J., Driesen, B., de Baat, E. C., Doevendans, P. A. F. M., Leiner, T., Grotenhuis, H. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30879465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0527-6
_version_ 1783404281574981632
author van Wijk, W. H. S.
Breur, J. M. P. J.
Westenberg, J. J. M.
Driessen, M. M. P.
Meijboom, F. J.
Driesen, B.
de Baat, E. C.
Doevendans, P. A. F. M.
Leiner, T.
Grotenhuis, H. B.
author_facet van Wijk, W. H. S.
Breur, J. M. P. J.
Westenberg, J. J. M.
Driessen, M. M. P.
Meijboom, F. J.
Driesen, B.
de Baat, E. C.
Doevendans, P. A. F. M.
Leiner, T.
Grotenhuis, H. B.
author_sort van Wijk, W. H. S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aortic regurgitation (AR) and subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction expressed by myocardial deformation imaging are common in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation (ASO). Echocardiographic evaluation is often hampered by reduced acoustic window settings. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides a robust alternative as it allows for comprehensive assessment of degree of AR and LV function. The purpose of this study is to validate CMR based 4-dimensional flow quantification (4D flow) for degree of AR and feature tracking strain measurements for LV deformation assessment in ASO patients. METHODS: A total of 81 ASO patients (median 20.6 years, IQR 13.5–28.4) underwent CMR for 4D and 2D flow analysis. CMR global longitudinal strain (GLS) feature tracking was compared to echocardiographic (echo) speckle tracking. Agreements between and within tests were expressed as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Eleven ASO patients (13.6%) showed AR > 5% by 4D flow, with good correlation to 2D flow assessment (ICC = 0.85). 4D flow stroke volume of the aortic valve demonstrated good agreement to 2D stroke volume over the mitral valve (internal validation, ICC = 0.85) and multi-slice planimetric LV stroke volume (external validation, ICC = 0.95). 2D flow stroke volume showed slightly less, though still good agreement with 4D flow (ICC = 0.78) and planimetric LV stroke volume (ICC = 0.87). GLS by CMR was normal (− 18.8 ± 4.4%) and demonstrated good agreement with GLS and segmental analysis by echocardiographic speckle tracking (GLS = − 17.3 ± 3.1%, ICC of 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic 4D flow and CMR feature tracking GLS analysis demonstrate good to excellent agreement with 2D flow assessment and echocardiographic speckle tracking, respectively, and can therefore reliably be used for an integrated and comprehensive CMR analysis of aortic valve competence and LV deformation analysis in ASO patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64217162019-03-28 Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation van Wijk, W. H. S. Breur, J. M. P. J. Westenberg, J. J. M. Driessen, M. M. P. Meijboom, F. J. Driesen, B. de Baat, E. C. Doevendans, P. A. F. M. Leiner, T. Grotenhuis, H. B. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Aortic regurgitation (AR) and subclinical left ventricular (LV) dysfunction expressed by myocardial deformation imaging are common in patients with transposition of the great arteries after the arterial switch operation (ASO). Echocardiographic evaluation is often hampered by reduced acoustic window settings. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides a robust alternative as it allows for comprehensive assessment of degree of AR and LV function. The purpose of this study is to validate CMR based 4-dimensional flow quantification (4D flow) for degree of AR and feature tracking strain measurements for LV deformation assessment in ASO patients. METHODS: A total of 81 ASO patients (median 20.6 years, IQR 13.5–28.4) underwent CMR for 4D and 2D flow analysis. CMR global longitudinal strain (GLS) feature tracking was compared to echocardiographic (echo) speckle tracking. Agreements between and within tests were expressed as intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Eleven ASO patients (13.6%) showed AR > 5% by 4D flow, with good correlation to 2D flow assessment (ICC = 0.85). 4D flow stroke volume of the aortic valve demonstrated good agreement to 2D stroke volume over the mitral valve (internal validation, ICC = 0.85) and multi-slice planimetric LV stroke volume (external validation, ICC = 0.95). 2D flow stroke volume showed slightly less, though still good agreement with 4D flow (ICC = 0.78) and planimetric LV stroke volume (ICC = 0.87). GLS by CMR was normal (− 18.8 ± 4.4%) and demonstrated good agreement with GLS and segmental analysis by echocardiographic speckle tracking (GLS = − 17.3 ± 3.1%, ICC of 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Aortic 4D flow and CMR feature tracking GLS analysis demonstrate good to excellent agreement with 2D flow assessment and echocardiographic speckle tracking, respectively, and can therefore reliably be used for an integrated and comprehensive CMR analysis of aortic valve competence and LV deformation analysis in ASO patients. BioMed Central 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6421716/ /pubmed/30879465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0527-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
van Wijk, W. H. S.
Breur, J. M. P. J.
Westenberg, J. J. M.
Driessen, M. M. P.
Meijboom, F. J.
Driesen, B.
de Baat, E. C.
Doevendans, P. A. F. M.
Leiner, T.
Grotenhuis, H. B.
Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation
title Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation
title_full Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation
title_fullStr Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation
title_full_unstemmed Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation
title_short Validation of aortic valve 4D flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation
title_sort validation of aortic valve 4d flow analysis and myocardial deformation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after the arterial switch operation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30879465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-019-0527-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwijkwhs validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT breurjmpj validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT westenbergjjm validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT driessenmmp validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT meijboomfj validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT driesenb validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT debaatec validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT doevendanspafm validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT leinert validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation
AT grotenhuishb validationofaorticvalve4dflowanalysisandmyocardialdeformationbycardiovascularmagneticresonanceinpatientsafterthearterialswitchoperation