Cargando…

The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering

BACKGROUND: Systematic studies on factitious disorders and malingering in large populations are rare. To address this issue, we performed a nationwide epidemiological study in Norway on the incidence of these diagnoses in an unselected patient population. In particular, we tried to confirm the diagn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schrader, Harald, Bøhmer, Thomas, Aasly, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3891809
_version_ 1783404291226075136
author Schrader, Harald
Bøhmer, Thomas
Aasly, Jan
author_facet Schrader, Harald
Bøhmer, Thomas
Aasly, Jan
author_sort Schrader, Harald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic studies on factitious disorders and malingering in large populations are rare. To address this issue, we performed a nationwide epidemiological study in Norway on the incidence of these diagnoses in an unselected patient population. In particular, we tried to confirm the diagnoses and to estimate the contribution of Munchausen syndrome to the spectrum of factitious disorders. METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), which provided a deidentified list of all patients from 2008 to 2016 who had received the ICD-10 diagnosis of F68.1 or the diagnosis code Z76.5. RESULTS: Altogether, 237 patients (99 females; 138 males) received a diagnosis of F68.1. Code Z76.5 was applied to 52 patients (12 females; 40 males), all diagnosed within health institutions. Three of 1700 specialists (somatic specialist, psychologist, or psychiatrist) in private practice had diagnosed a factitious disorder in altogether 87 patients. After contacting these specialists, we could identify no true case of F68.1. For 24 of 146 patients who were equally distributed by gender within health institutions, we managed to identify the diagnosing healthcare providers. Of these 24 patients, only 11 correctly qualified for code F68.1. Only two female patients qualified for a Munchausen syndrome diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a male predominance for the diagnosis of malingering. An earlier suspicion of a female predominance for Munchausen syndrome is upheld. There is significant underdiagnosing and misdiagnosing for both conditions and for factitious disorders in general. To separate the most serious form of factitious disorders from milder forms and to facilitate more systematic research, we recommend a specific ICD diagnosis for Munchausen syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6421757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64217572019-04-03 The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering Schrader, Harald Bøhmer, Thomas Aasly, Jan Behav Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic studies on factitious disorders and malingering in large populations are rare. To address this issue, we performed a nationwide epidemiological study in Norway on the incidence of these diagnoses in an unselected patient population. In particular, we tried to confirm the diagnoses and to estimate the contribution of Munchausen syndrome to the spectrum of factitious disorders. METHODS: We analyzed data obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), which provided a deidentified list of all patients from 2008 to 2016 who had received the ICD-10 diagnosis of F68.1 or the diagnosis code Z76.5. RESULTS: Altogether, 237 patients (99 females; 138 males) received a diagnosis of F68.1. Code Z76.5 was applied to 52 patients (12 females; 40 males), all diagnosed within health institutions. Three of 1700 specialists (somatic specialist, psychologist, or psychiatrist) in private practice had diagnosed a factitious disorder in altogether 87 patients. After contacting these specialists, we could identify no true case of F68.1. For 24 of 146 patients who were equally distributed by gender within health institutions, we managed to identify the diagnosing healthcare providers. Of these 24 patients, only 11 correctly qualified for code F68.1. Only two female patients qualified for a Munchausen syndrome diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: There is a male predominance for the diagnosis of malingering. An earlier suspicion of a female predominance for Munchausen syndrome is upheld. There is significant underdiagnosing and misdiagnosing for both conditions and for factitious disorders in general. To separate the most serious form of factitious disorders from milder forms and to facilitate more systematic research, we recommend a specific ICD diagnosis for Munchausen syndrome. Hindawi 2019-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6421757/ /pubmed/30944662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3891809 Text en Copyright © 2019 Harald Schrader et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schrader, Harald
Bøhmer, Thomas
Aasly, Jan
The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
title The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
title_full The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
title_fullStr The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
title_full_unstemmed The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
title_short The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
title_sort incidence of diagnosis of munchausen syndrome, other factitious disorders, and malingering
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6421757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3891809
work_keys_str_mv AT schraderharald theincidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering
AT bøhmerthomas theincidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering
AT aaslyjan theincidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering
AT schraderharald incidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering
AT bøhmerthomas incidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering
AT aaslyjan incidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering