Cargando…
What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group
BACKGROUND: This study reports how parents and young people who had an experience of febrile neutropenia (FN) improved the design of a trial to inform the management of this condition. Five parents, a young person who had completed treatment and three clinician-researchers contributed. METHODS: The...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000398 |
_version_ | 1783404357971083264 |
---|---|
author | Phillips, Bob Depani, Sarita Morgan, Jess |
author_facet | Phillips, Bob Depani, Sarita Morgan, Jess |
author_sort | Phillips, Bob |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study reports how parents and young people who had an experience of febrile neutropenia (FN) improved the design of a trial to inform the management of this condition. Five parents, a young person who had completed treatment and three clinician-researchers contributed. METHODS: The group was formed after an invitation on social media and met via video conference. Many participants were from an existing childhood-cancer parent-involvement group. The initial questions asked during discussion were about the importance of the topic, the views on the need for a trial, which important outcomes should be measured and the practical aspects which would make it easier or more difficult for people to take part in it. The conversation occurred for an entire afternoon, was audio and video recorded, transcribed, analysed and checked by those involved. The fifth parent added to this via email. RESULTS: The group altered the trial structure by proposing randomising of each child to one of the two management methods through the whole of their anti-cancer treatment, rather than randomising the study sites or the child at each visit. They felt that even if people declined taking part in the study in the first weeks of diagnosis, their views might change and they should be allowed to consent later. They also proposed methods of collecting important patient and family data, enriching the medical information gained in the study. Active follow-up, negotiated for each individual family, was also suggested. CONCLUSION: Trials for improving the management of FN in children and young people who are undergoing anti-cancer treatments should consider individual-patient randomisation, collection of ‘quality of life’ and ‘experience of care’ aspects using digital and paper-based methods, engage families in shared decision-making about management options and ensure adequate supportive information is available and accessible to all patients regardless of background, geographical location or age. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6422240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64222402019-04-05 What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group Phillips, Bob Depani, Sarita Morgan, Jess BMJ Paediatr Open Patient Perspective BACKGROUND: This study reports how parents and young people who had an experience of febrile neutropenia (FN) improved the design of a trial to inform the management of this condition. Five parents, a young person who had completed treatment and three clinician-researchers contributed. METHODS: The group was formed after an invitation on social media and met via video conference. Many participants were from an existing childhood-cancer parent-involvement group. The initial questions asked during discussion were about the importance of the topic, the views on the need for a trial, which important outcomes should be measured and the practical aspects which would make it easier or more difficult for people to take part in it. The conversation occurred for an entire afternoon, was audio and video recorded, transcribed, analysed and checked by those involved. The fifth parent added to this via email. RESULTS: The group altered the trial structure by proposing randomising of each child to one of the two management methods through the whole of their anti-cancer treatment, rather than randomising the study sites or the child at each visit. They felt that even if people declined taking part in the study in the first weeks of diagnosis, their views might change and they should be allowed to consent later. They also proposed methods of collecting important patient and family data, enriching the medical information gained in the study. Active follow-up, negotiated for each individual family, was also suggested. CONCLUSION: Trials for improving the management of FN in children and young people who are undergoing anti-cancer treatments should consider individual-patient randomisation, collection of ‘quality of life’ and ‘experience of care’ aspects using digital and paper-based methods, engage families in shared decision-making about management options and ensure adequate supportive information is available and accessible to all patients regardless of background, geographical location or age. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6422240/ /pubmed/30957027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000398 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Patient Perspective Phillips, Bob Depani, Sarita Morgan, Jess What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group |
title | What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group |
title_full | What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group |
title_fullStr | What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group |
title_full_unstemmed | What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group |
title_short | What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group |
title_sort | what do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? report of a patient/public involvement group |
topic | Patient Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000398 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phillipsbob whatdofamilieswanttoimproveinthemanagementofpaediatricfebrileneutropeniaduringanticancertreatmentreportofapatientpublicinvolvementgroup AT depanisarita whatdofamilieswanttoimproveinthemanagementofpaediatricfebrileneutropeniaduringanticancertreatmentreportofapatientpublicinvolvementgroup AT morganjess whatdofamilieswanttoimproveinthemanagementofpaediatricfebrileneutropeniaduringanticancertreatmentreportofapatientpublicinvolvementgroup |