Cargando…

What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group

BACKGROUND: This study reports how parents and young people who had an experience of febrile neutropenia (FN) improved the design of a trial to inform the management of this condition. Five parents, a young person who had completed treatment and three clinician-researchers contributed. METHODS: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Bob, Depani, Sarita, Morgan, Jess
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000398
_version_ 1783404357971083264
author Phillips, Bob
Depani, Sarita
Morgan, Jess
author_facet Phillips, Bob
Depani, Sarita
Morgan, Jess
author_sort Phillips, Bob
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study reports how parents and young people who had an experience of febrile neutropenia (FN) improved the design of a trial to inform the management of this condition. Five parents, a young person who had completed treatment and three clinician-researchers contributed. METHODS: The group was formed after an invitation on social media and met via video conference. Many participants were from an existing childhood-cancer parent-involvement group. The initial questions asked during discussion were about the importance of the topic, the views on the need for a trial, which important outcomes should be measured and the practical aspects which would make it easier or more difficult for people to take part in it. The conversation occurred for an entire afternoon, was audio and video recorded, transcribed, analysed and checked by those involved. The fifth parent added to this via email. RESULTS: The group altered the trial structure by proposing randomising of each child to one of the two management methods through the whole of their anti-cancer treatment, rather than randomising the study sites or the child at each visit. They felt that even if people declined taking part in the study in the first weeks of diagnosis, their views might change and they should be allowed to consent later. They also proposed methods of collecting important patient and family data, enriching the medical information gained in the study. Active follow-up, negotiated for each individual family, was also suggested. CONCLUSION: Trials for improving the management of FN in children and young people who are undergoing anti-cancer treatments should consider individual-patient randomisation, collection of ‘quality of life’ and ‘experience of care’ aspects using digital and paper-based methods, engage families in shared decision-making about management options and ensure adequate supportive information is available and accessible to all patients regardless of background, geographical location or age.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6422240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64222402019-04-05 What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group Phillips, Bob Depani, Sarita Morgan, Jess BMJ Paediatr Open Patient Perspective BACKGROUND: This study reports how parents and young people who had an experience of febrile neutropenia (FN) improved the design of a trial to inform the management of this condition. Five parents, a young person who had completed treatment and three clinician-researchers contributed. METHODS: The group was formed after an invitation on social media and met via video conference. Many participants were from an existing childhood-cancer parent-involvement group. The initial questions asked during discussion were about the importance of the topic, the views on the need for a trial, which important outcomes should be measured and the practical aspects which would make it easier or more difficult for people to take part in it. The conversation occurred for an entire afternoon, was audio and video recorded, transcribed, analysed and checked by those involved. The fifth parent added to this via email. RESULTS: The group altered the trial structure by proposing randomising of each child to one of the two management methods through the whole of their anti-cancer treatment, rather than randomising the study sites or the child at each visit. They felt that even if people declined taking part in the study in the first weeks of diagnosis, their views might change and they should be allowed to consent later. They also proposed methods of collecting important patient and family data, enriching the medical information gained in the study. Active follow-up, negotiated for each individual family, was also suggested. CONCLUSION: Trials for improving the management of FN in children and young people who are undergoing anti-cancer treatments should consider individual-patient randomisation, collection of ‘quality of life’ and ‘experience of care’ aspects using digital and paper-based methods, engage families in shared decision-making about management options and ensure adequate supportive information is available and accessible to all patients regardless of background, geographical location or age. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6422240/ /pubmed/30957027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000398 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Patient Perspective
Phillips, Bob
Depani, Sarita
Morgan, Jess
What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group
title What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group
title_full What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group
title_fullStr What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group
title_full_unstemmed What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group
title_short What do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? Report of a patient/public involvement group
title_sort what do families want to improve in the management of paediatric febrile neutropenia during anti-cancer treatment? report of a patient/public involvement group
topic Patient Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30957027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2018-000398
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsbob whatdofamilieswanttoimproveinthemanagementofpaediatricfebrileneutropeniaduringanticancertreatmentreportofapatientpublicinvolvementgroup
AT depanisarita whatdofamilieswanttoimproveinthemanagementofpaediatricfebrileneutropeniaduringanticancertreatmentreportofapatientpublicinvolvementgroup
AT morganjess whatdofamilieswanttoimproveinthemanagementofpaediatricfebrileneutropeniaduringanticancertreatmentreportofapatientpublicinvolvementgroup