Cargando…
Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device during coronary angiography, and compare it with invasive blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with an indication for hemodynamic study were selected for this investigation, and kept in supine positio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892376 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4156 |
_version_ | 1783404377404342272 |
---|---|
author | Borges, Melania Aparecida Prado, Marcelo Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira Moreira, Antonio Carlos Ishibe, Eder Issao Katz, Marcelo Cintra, Fatima Dumas |
author_facet | Borges, Melania Aparecida Prado, Marcelo Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira Moreira, Antonio Carlos Ishibe, Eder Issao Katz, Marcelo Cintra, Fatima Dumas |
author_sort | Borges, Melania Aparecida |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device during coronary angiography, and compare it with invasive blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with an indication for hemodynamic study were selected for this investigation, and kept in supine position. Before starting the coronary angiography, they were instructed about the use of the left radial bracelet for beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the time required for the catheterization laboratory team to acquire the first invasive blood pressure reading and the time to obtain the first beat-to-beat reading (11.1±5.1 and 1.5±1.8, respectively; p<0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficients (95%CI) of systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 0.897 (0.780-0.952) and 0.876 (0.734-0.942), indicating good reproducibility. CONCLUSION: This study showed the process to develop a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device. When compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring, there were no significant differences between the two methods. This technique may play a promising coadjuvant role when combined with invasive monitoring during coronary angiography procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6422362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64223622019-03-21 Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography Borges, Melania Aparecida Prado, Marcelo Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira Moreira, Antonio Carlos Ishibe, Eder Issao Katz, Marcelo Cintra, Fatima Dumas Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device during coronary angiography, and compare it with invasive blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with an indication for hemodynamic study were selected for this investigation, and kept in supine position. Before starting the coronary angiography, they were instructed about the use of the left radial bracelet for beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the time required for the catheterization laboratory team to acquire the first invasive blood pressure reading and the time to obtain the first beat-to-beat reading (11.1±5.1 and 1.5±1.8, respectively; p<0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficients (95%CI) of systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 0.897 (0.780-0.952) and 0.876 (0.734-0.942), indicating good reproducibility. CONCLUSION: This study showed the process to develop a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device. When compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring, there were no significant differences between the two methods. This technique may play a promising coadjuvant role when combined with invasive monitoring during coronary angiography procedures. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6422362/ /pubmed/30892376 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4156 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Borges, Melania Aparecida Prado, Marcelo Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira Moreira, Antonio Carlos Ishibe, Eder Issao Katz, Marcelo Cintra, Fatima Dumas Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography |
title | Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography |
title_full | Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography |
title_fullStr | Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography |
title_short | Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography |
title_sort | development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892376 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT borgesmelaniaaparecida developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography AT pradomarcelo developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography AT santinitalesrobertodesouza developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography AT barbosaadrianohenriquepereira developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography AT moreiraantoniocarlos developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography AT ishibeederissao developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography AT katzmarcelo developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography AT cintrafatimadumas developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography |