Cargando…

Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device during coronary angiography, and compare it with invasive blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with an indication for hemodynamic study were selected for this investigation, and kept in supine positio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borges, Melania Aparecida, Prado, Marcelo, Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza, Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira, Moreira, Antonio Carlos, Ishibe, Eder Issao, Katz, Marcelo, Cintra, Fatima Dumas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892376
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4156
_version_ 1783404377404342272
author Borges, Melania Aparecida
Prado, Marcelo
Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza
Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira
Moreira, Antonio Carlos
Ishibe, Eder Issao
Katz, Marcelo
Cintra, Fatima Dumas
author_facet Borges, Melania Aparecida
Prado, Marcelo
Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza
Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira
Moreira, Antonio Carlos
Ishibe, Eder Issao
Katz, Marcelo
Cintra, Fatima Dumas
author_sort Borges, Melania Aparecida
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device during coronary angiography, and compare it with invasive blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with an indication for hemodynamic study were selected for this investigation, and kept in supine position. Before starting the coronary angiography, they were instructed about the use of the left radial bracelet for beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the time required for the catheterization laboratory team to acquire the first invasive blood pressure reading and the time to obtain the first beat-to-beat reading (11.1±5.1 and 1.5±1.8, respectively; p<0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficients (95%CI) of systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 0.897 (0.780-0.952) and 0.876 (0.734-0.942), indicating good reproducibility. CONCLUSION: This study showed the process to develop a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device. When compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring, there were no significant differences between the two methods. This technique may play a promising coadjuvant role when combined with invasive monitoring during coronary angiography procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6422362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64223622019-03-21 Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography Borges, Melania Aparecida Prado, Marcelo Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira Moreira, Antonio Carlos Ishibe, Eder Issao Katz, Marcelo Cintra, Fatima Dumas Einstein (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVE: To develop and test a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device during coronary angiography, and compare it with invasive blood pressure monitoring. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with an indication for hemodynamic study were selected for this investigation, and kept in supine position. Before starting the coronary angiography, they were instructed about the use of the left radial bracelet for beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the time required for the catheterization laboratory team to acquire the first invasive blood pressure reading and the time to obtain the first beat-to-beat reading (11.1±5.1 and 1.5±1.8, respectively; p<0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficients (95%CI) of systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 0.897 (0.780-0.952) and 0.876 (0.734-0.942), indicating good reproducibility. CONCLUSION: This study showed the process to develop a beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device. When compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring, there were no significant differences between the two methods. This technique may play a promising coadjuvant role when combined with invasive monitoring during coronary angiography procedures. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6422362/ /pubmed/30892376 http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4156 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Borges, Melania Aparecida
Prado, Marcelo
Santini, Tales Roberto de Souza
Barbosa, Adriano Henrique Pereira
Moreira, Antonio Carlos
Ishibe, Eder Issao
Katz, Marcelo
Cintra, Fatima Dumas
Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
title Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
title_full Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
title_fullStr Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
title_full_unstemmed Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
title_short Development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
title_sort development and clinical validation of a non-invasive, beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring device, compared to invasive blood pressure monitoring during coronary angiography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30892376
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2019AO4156
work_keys_str_mv AT borgesmelaniaaparecida developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography
AT pradomarcelo developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography
AT santinitalesrobertodesouza developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography
AT barbosaadrianohenriquepereira developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography
AT moreiraantoniocarlos developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography
AT ishibeederissao developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography
AT katzmarcelo developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography
AT cintrafatimadumas developmentandclinicalvalidationofanoninvasivebeattobeatbloodpressuremonitoringdevicecomparedtoinvasivebloodpressuremonitoringduringcoronaryangiography