Cargando…

A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers

BACKGROUND: Reliability studies are commonly used in questionnaire development studies and questionnaire validation studies. This study reviews the sample size guideline for Cronbach’s alpha test. METHODS: Manual sample size calculation using Microsoft Excel software and sample size tables were tabu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bujang, Mohamad Adam, Omar, Evi Diana, Baharum, Nur Akmal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30914882
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9
_version_ 1783404403122765824
author Bujang, Mohamad Adam
Omar, Evi Diana
Baharum, Nur Akmal
author_facet Bujang, Mohamad Adam
Omar, Evi Diana
Baharum, Nur Akmal
author_sort Bujang, Mohamad Adam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reliability studies are commonly used in questionnaire development studies and questionnaire validation studies. This study reviews the sample size guideline for Cronbach’s alpha test. METHODS: Manual sample size calculation using Microsoft Excel software and sample size tables were tabulated based on a single coefficient alpha and the comparison of two coefficients alpha. RESULTS: For a single coefficient alpha test, the approach by assuming the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient equals to zero in the null hypothesis will yield a smaller sample size of less than 30 to achieve a minimum desired effect size of 0.7. However, setting the coefficient of Cronbach’s alpha larger than zero in the null hypothesis could be necessary and this will yield larger sample size. For comparison of two coefficients of Cronbach’s alpha, a larger sample size is needed when testing for smaller effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of the internal consistency of an instrument, the present study proposed the Cronbach’s alpha’s coefficient to be set at 0.5 in the null hypothesis and hence larger sample size is needed. For comparison of two coefficients’ of Cronbach’s alpha, justification is needed whether testing for extremely low and extremely large effect sizes are scientifically necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6422571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64225712019-03-26 A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers Bujang, Mohamad Adam Omar, Evi Diana Baharum, Nur Akmal Malays J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Reliability studies are commonly used in questionnaire development studies and questionnaire validation studies. This study reviews the sample size guideline for Cronbach’s alpha test. METHODS: Manual sample size calculation using Microsoft Excel software and sample size tables were tabulated based on a single coefficient alpha and the comparison of two coefficients alpha. RESULTS: For a single coefficient alpha test, the approach by assuming the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient equals to zero in the null hypothesis will yield a smaller sample size of less than 30 to achieve a minimum desired effect size of 0.7. However, setting the coefficient of Cronbach’s alpha larger than zero in the null hypothesis could be necessary and this will yield larger sample size. For comparison of two coefficients of Cronbach’s alpha, a larger sample size is needed when testing for smaller effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of the internal consistency of an instrument, the present study proposed the Cronbach’s alpha’s coefficient to be set at 0.5 in the null hypothesis and hence larger sample size is needed. For comparison of two coefficients’ of Cronbach’s alpha, justification is needed whether testing for extremely low and extremely large effect sizes are scientifically necessary. Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia 2018-11 2018-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6422571/ /pubmed/30914882 http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9 Text en © Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2018 This work is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Bujang, Mohamad Adam
Omar, Evi Diana
Baharum, Nur Akmal
A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers
title A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers
title_full A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers
title_fullStr A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers
title_full_unstemmed A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers
title_short A Review on Sample Size Determination for Cronbach’s Alpha Test: A Simple Guide for Researchers
title_sort review on sample size determination for cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30914882
http://dx.doi.org/10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9
work_keys_str_mv AT bujangmohamadadam areviewonsamplesizedeterminationforcronbachsalphatestasimpleguideforresearchers
AT omarevidiana areviewonsamplesizedeterminationforcronbachsalphatestasimpleguideforresearchers
AT baharumnurakmal areviewonsamplesizedeterminationforcronbachsalphatestasimpleguideforresearchers
AT bujangmohamadadam reviewonsamplesizedeterminationforcronbachsalphatestasimpleguideforresearchers
AT omarevidiana reviewonsamplesizedeterminationforcronbachsalphatestasimpleguideforresearchers
AT baharumnurakmal reviewonsamplesizedeterminationforcronbachsalphatestasimpleguideforresearchers