Cargando…

Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate post‐marketing label changes in dosing information of biologicals. METHODS: Biologicals authorized between 2007 and 2014 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) were included and followed up from marketing authorization until 31 December 2016 or date of with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minnema, Lotte A., Giezen, Thijs J., Gardarsdottir, Helga, Egberts, Toine C. G., Leufkens, Hubert G. M., Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13843
_version_ 1783404410081116160
author Minnema, Lotte A.
Giezen, Thijs J.
Gardarsdottir, Helga
Egberts, Toine C. G.
Leufkens, Hubert G. M.
Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
author_facet Minnema, Lotte A.
Giezen, Thijs J.
Gardarsdottir, Helga
Egberts, Toine C. G.
Leufkens, Hubert G. M.
Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
author_sort Minnema, Lotte A.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate post‐marketing label changes in dosing information of biologicals. METHODS: Biologicals authorized between 2007 and 2014 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) were included and followed up from marketing authorization until 31 December 2016 or date of withdrawal of the marketing authorization. The primary outcome of the study was defined as label change in dosing information for the initially approved indication. Incidence of changes, type of change and mean time to change were assessed. As a secondary outcome, label changes in dosing information for extended indications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 71 biologicals were included. Dosing information in the label changed for the initial indication during follow‐up for eight products (11%). In one of the eight products the change concerned an increase in dose. Also, a change in dosing frequency was identified in three products, for one product a recommendation was added that therapy could be initiated with or without a loading dose, and for one product the minimum dose was removed and a maximum dose was added. For the remaining product the dose was decreased due to safety issues. For 30 products (42%) the indication was extended at least once. No changes in dosing information were observed for the extended indications (n = 59) during follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that in 11% of the biologicals, the dosing for the initial indication in the label was changed. In contrast to small molecules, the dose was rarely reduced for safety reasons.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6422665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64226652019-03-28 Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals Minnema, Lotte A. Giezen, Thijs J. Gardarsdottir, Helga Egberts, Toine C. G. Leufkens, Hubert G. M. Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K. Br J Clin Pharmacol Original Articles AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate post‐marketing label changes in dosing information of biologicals. METHODS: Biologicals authorized between 2007 and 2014 by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) were included and followed up from marketing authorization until 31 December 2016 or date of withdrawal of the marketing authorization. The primary outcome of the study was defined as label change in dosing information for the initially approved indication. Incidence of changes, type of change and mean time to change were assessed. As a secondary outcome, label changes in dosing information for extended indications were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 71 biologicals were included. Dosing information in the label changed for the initial indication during follow‐up for eight products (11%). In one of the eight products the change concerned an increase in dose. Also, a change in dosing frequency was identified in three products, for one product a recommendation was added that therapy could be initiated with or without a loading dose, and for one product the minimum dose was removed and a maximum dose was added. For the remaining product the dose was decreased due to safety issues. For 30 products (42%) the indication was extended at least once. No changes in dosing information were observed for the extended indications (n = 59) during follow‐up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that in 11% of the biologicals, the dosing for the initial indication in the label was changed. In contrast to small molecules, the dose was rarely reduced for safety reasons. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-16 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6422665/ /pubmed/30593087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13843 Text en © 2018 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Minnema, Lotte A.
Giezen, Thijs J.
Gardarsdottir, Helga
Egberts, Toine C. G.
Leufkens, Hubert G. M.
Mantel‐Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals
title Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals
title_full Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals
title_fullStr Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals
title_full_unstemmed Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals
title_short Post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals
title_sort post‐marketing dosing changes in the label of biologicals
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6422665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30593087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13843
work_keys_str_mv AT minnemalottea postmarketingdosingchangesinthelabelofbiologicals
AT giezenthijsj postmarketingdosingchangesinthelabelofbiologicals
AT gardarsdottirhelga postmarketingdosingchangesinthelabelofbiologicals
AT egbertstoinecg postmarketingdosingchangesinthelabelofbiologicals
AT leufkenshubertgm postmarketingdosingchangesinthelabelofbiologicals
AT mantelteeuwisseaukjek postmarketingdosingchangesinthelabelofbiologicals