Cargando…

Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response

Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) is being developed as an alternative to standard visual perimetry. In mfPOP, pupil responses to sparse multifocal luminance stimuli are extracted from the overall composite response. These individual test-region responses are subject to gain-cont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carle, Corinne Frances, James, Andrew Charles, Rosli, Yanti, Maddess, Ted
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6423807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00203
_version_ 1783404590889172992
author Carle, Corinne Frances
James, Andrew Charles
Rosli, Yanti
Maddess, Ted
author_facet Carle, Corinne Frances
James, Andrew Charles
Rosli, Yanti
Maddess, Ted
author_sort Carle, Corinne Frances
collection PubMed
description Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) is being developed as an alternative to standard visual perimetry. In mfPOP, pupil responses to sparse multifocal luminance stimuli are extracted from the overall composite response. These individual test-region responses are subject to gain-control which is dependent on the temporal and spatial density of stimuli. This study aimed to localize this gain within the pupil pathway. Pupil constriction amplitudes of 8 subjects (41.5 ±12.7 y, 4 male) were measured using a series of 14 mfPOP stimulus variants. The temporal density of stimulus signal at the levels of retina, pretectal olivary nuclei (PON), and Edinger-Westphal nuclei (EWN) were controlled using a combination of manipulation of the mean interval between stimulus presentations (3 or 6 stimuli/s/hemiretina) and the restriction of stimuli to specific subsets of the 24 visual field test-regions per eye (left or right eye, left or right hemifield, or nasal or temporal hemifield). No significant difference was observed between mfPOP variants with differing signal density at the retina or PON but matched density at the other levels. In contrast, where signal density differed at the EWN but was the same at the retinal and PON levels e.g., between 3 stim/s homonymous hemifield and all test-region variants, significant reductions in constriction amplitudes were observed [t((30)) = −2.07 to −2.50, all p < 0.05]. Similar, although more variable, relationships were seen using nasal, and temporal hemifield stimuli. Results suggest that the majority of gain-control in the subcortical pupillary pathway occurs at the level of the EWN.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6423807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64238072019-03-29 Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response Carle, Corinne Frances James, Andrew Charles Rosli, Yanti Maddess, Ted Front Neurol Neurology Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) is being developed as an alternative to standard visual perimetry. In mfPOP, pupil responses to sparse multifocal luminance stimuli are extracted from the overall composite response. These individual test-region responses are subject to gain-control which is dependent on the temporal and spatial density of stimuli. This study aimed to localize this gain within the pupil pathway. Pupil constriction amplitudes of 8 subjects (41.5 ±12.7 y, 4 male) were measured using a series of 14 mfPOP stimulus variants. The temporal density of stimulus signal at the levels of retina, pretectal olivary nuclei (PON), and Edinger-Westphal nuclei (EWN) were controlled using a combination of manipulation of the mean interval between stimulus presentations (3 or 6 stimuli/s/hemiretina) and the restriction of stimuli to specific subsets of the 24 visual field test-regions per eye (left or right eye, left or right hemifield, or nasal or temporal hemifield). No significant difference was observed between mfPOP variants with differing signal density at the retina or PON but matched density at the other levels. In contrast, where signal density differed at the EWN but was the same at the retinal and PON levels e.g., between 3 stim/s homonymous hemifield and all test-region variants, significant reductions in constriction amplitudes were observed [t((30)) = −2.07 to −2.50, all p < 0.05]. Similar, although more variable, relationships were seen using nasal, and temporal hemifield stimuli. Results suggest that the majority of gain-control in the subcortical pupillary pathway occurs at the level of the EWN. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6423807/ /pubmed/30930833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00203 Text en Copyright © 2019 Carle, James, Rosli and Maddess. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Carle, Corinne Frances
James, Andrew Charles
Rosli, Yanti
Maddess, Ted
Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response
title Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response
title_full Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response
title_fullStr Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response
title_full_unstemmed Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response
title_short Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response
title_sort localization of neuronal gain control in the pupillary response
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6423807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930833
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00203
work_keys_str_mv AT carlecorinnefrances localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse
AT jamesandrewcharles localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse
AT rosliyanti localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse
AT maddessted localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse