Cargando…
Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response
Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) is being developed as an alternative to standard visual perimetry. In mfPOP, pupil responses to sparse multifocal luminance stimuli are extracted from the overall composite response. These individual test-region responses are subject to gain-cont...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6423807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00203 |
_version_ | 1783404590889172992 |
---|---|
author | Carle, Corinne Frances James, Andrew Charles Rosli, Yanti Maddess, Ted |
author_facet | Carle, Corinne Frances James, Andrew Charles Rosli, Yanti Maddess, Ted |
author_sort | Carle, Corinne Frances |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) is being developed as an alternative to standard visual perimetry. In mfPOP, pupil responses to sparse multifocal luminance stimuli are extracted from the overall composite response. These individual test-region responses are subject to gain-control which is dependent on the temporal and spatial density of stimuli. This study aimed to localize this gain within the pupil pathway. Pupil constriction amplitudes of 8 subjects (41.5 ±12.7 y, 4 male) were measured using a series of 14 mfPOP stimulus variants. The temporal density of stimulus signal at the levels of retina, pretectal olivary nuclei (PON), and Edinger-Westphal nuclei (EWN) were controlled using a combination of manipulation of the mean interval between stimulus presentations (3 or 6 stimuli/s/hemiretina) and the restriction of stimuli to specific subsets of the 24 visual field test-regions per eye (left or right eye, left or right hemifield, or nasal or temporal hemifield). No significant difference was observed between mfPOP variants with differing signal density at the retina or PON but matched density at the other levels. In contrast, where signal density differed at the EWN but was the same at the retinal and PON levels e.g., between 3 stim/s homonymous hemifield and all test-region variants, significant reductions in constriction amplitudes were observed [t((30)) = −2.07 to −2.50, all p < 0.05]. Similar, although more variable, relationships were seen using nasal, and temporal hemifield stimuli. Results suggest that the majority of gain-control in the subcortical pupillary pathway occurs at the level of the EWN. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6423807 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64238072019-03-29 Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response Carle, Corinne Frances James, Andrew Charles Rosli, Yanti Maddess, Ted Front Neurol Neurology Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) is being developed as an alternative to standard visual perimetry. In mfPOP, pupil responses to sparse multifocal luminance stimuli are extracted from the overall composite response. These individual test-region responses are subject to gain-control which is dependent on the temporal and spatial density of stimuli. This study aimed to localize this gain within the pupil pathway. Pupil constriction amplitudes of 8 subjects (41.5 ±12.7 y, 4 male) were measured using a series of 14 mfPOP stimulus variants. The temporal density of stimulus signal at the levels of retina, pretectal olivary nuclei (PON), and Edinger-Westphal nuclei (EWN) were controlled using a combination of manipulation of the mean interval between stimulus presentations (3 or 6 stimuli/s/hemiretina) and the restriction of stimuli to specific subsets of the 24 visual field test-regions per eye (left or right eye, left or right hemifield, or nasal or temporal hemifield). No significant difference was observed between mfPOP variants with differing signal density at the retina or PON but matched density at the other levels. In contrast, where signal density differed at the EWN but was the same at the retinal and PON levels e.g., between 3 stim/s homonymous hemifield and all test-region variants, significant reductions in constriction amplitudes were observed [t((30)) = −2.07 to −2.50, all p < 0.05]. Similar, although more variable, relationships were seen using nasal, and temporal hemifield stimuli. Results suggest that the majority of gain-control in the subcortical pupillary pathway occurs at the level of the EWN. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6423807/ /pubmed/30930833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00203 Text en Copyright © 2019 Carle, James, Rosli and Maddess. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Carle, Corinne Frances James, Andrew Charles Rosli, Yanti Maddess, Ted Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response |
title | Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response |
title_full | Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response |
title_fullStr | Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response |
title_full_unstemmed | Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response |
title_short | Localization of Neuronal Gain Control in the Pupillary Response |
title_sort | localization of neuronal gain control in the pupillary response |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6423807/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30930833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00203 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlecorinnefrances localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse AT jamesandrewcharles localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse AT rosliyanti localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse AT maddessted localizationofneuronalgaincontrolinthepupillaryresponse |