Cargando…
Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial
BACKGROUND: A long-acting prodrug of nalbuphine, nalbuphine sebacate, has been developed for meeting the unmet medical need of long-acting analgesics. Naldebain(®) (nalbuphine sebacate) has been developed as a new premedication for postoperative pain management. The primary objective of this study i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6423831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3260-4 |
_version_ | 1783404596046069760 |
---|---|
author | Tsai, Hsiang-Lin Chang, Tsung-Kun Su, Wei-Chih Yeh, Yung-Sung Huang, Ching-Wen Ma, Cheng-Jen Wang, Jaw-Yuan |
author_facet | Tsai, Hsiang-Lin Chang, Tsung-Kun Su, Wei-Chih Yeh, Yung-Sung Huang, Ching-Wen Ma, Cheng-Jen Wang, Jaw-Yuan |
author_sort | Tsai, Hsiang-Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A long-acting prodrug of nalbuphine, nalbuphine sebacate, has been developed for meeting the unmet medical need of long-acting analgesics. Naldebain(®) (nalbuphine sebacate) has been developed as a new premedication for postoperative pain management. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a single dose of intramuscular Naldebain(®) in patients scheduled to undergo elective laparotomy. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 110 patients will be recruited and randomized into two treatment groups. Group 1 receives a single dose of Naldebain(®) intramuscularly 24 ± 12 h prior to surgery. Group 2 receives intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl through 48 h postsurgery. Both groups will have follow-up observations until the final visit (day of discharge, day 6–30). The primary efficacy endpoint is to assess time-specific pain intensity calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) of a visual analog scale at individual time points and by using total AUC. Safety endpoints—including incidence of treatment, emergent adverse events, and percentage of abnormality from baseline to final visit—in vital signs, laboratory tests, and injection site evaluations will also be analyzed. Statistical analyses will be performed on the data to compare the two groups. DISCUSSION: Post-laparotomy pain can have a harmful effect on patient recovery; therefore, a slow-release formulation that can cover at least 7 days of analgesic effect is required. This study will demonstrate whether a single use of Naldebain(®) is not less efficacious than PCA with fentanyl for pain management as a non-inferior trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03296488. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3260-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6423831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64238312019-03-28 Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial Tsai, Hsiang-Lin Chang, Tsung-Kun Su, Wei-Chih Yeh, Yung-Sung Huang, Ching-Wen Ma, Cheng-Jen Wang, Jaw-Yuan Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A long-acting prodrug of nalbuphine, nalbuphine sebacate, has been developed for meeting the unmet medical need of long-acting analgesics. Naldebain(®) (nalbuphine sebacate) has been developed as a new premedication for postoperative pain management. The primary objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of a single dose of intramuscular Naldebain(®) in patients scheduled to undergo elective laparotomy. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 110 patients will be recruited and randomized into two treatment groups. Group 1 receives a single dose of Naldebain(®) intramuscularly 24 ± 12 h prior to surgery. Group 2 receives intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl through 48 h postsurgery. Both groups will have follow-up observations until the final visit (day of discharge, day 6–30). The primary efficacy endpoint is to assess time-specific pain intensity calculated as the area under the curve (AUC) of a visual analog scale at individual time points and by using total AUC. Safety endpoints—including incidence of treatment, emergent adverse events, and percentage of abnormality from baseline to final visit—in vital signs, laboratory tests, and injection site evaluations will also be analyzed. Statistical analyses will be performed on the data to compare the two groups. DISCUSSION: Post-laparotomy pain can have a harmful effect on patient recovery; therefore, a slow-release formulation that can cover at least 7 days of analgesic effect is required. This study will demonstrate whether a single use of Naldebain(®) is not less efficacious than PCA with fentanyl for pain management as a non-inferior trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03296488. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-019-3260-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6423831/ /pubmed/30885242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3260-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Tsai, Hsiang-Lin Chang, Tsung-Kun Su, Wei-Chih Yeh, Yung-Sung Huang, Ching-Wen Ma, Cheng-Jen Wang, Jaw-Yuan Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial |
title | Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial |
title_full | Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial |
title_short | Comparing efficacy and safety between Naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial |
title_sort | comparing efficacy and safety between naldebain(®) and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl for pain management post-laparotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferior trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6423831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30885242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3260-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaihsianglin comparingefficacyandsafetybetweennaldebainandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiawithfentanylforpainmanagementpostlaparotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferiortrial AT changtsungkun comparingefficacyandsafetybetweennaldebainandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiawithfentanylforpainmanagementpostlaparotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferiortrial AT suweichih comparingefficacyandsafetybetweennaldebainandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiawithfentanylforpainmanagementpostlaparotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferiortrial AT yehyungsung comparingefficacyandsafetybetweennaldebainandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiawithfentanylforpainmanagementpostlaparotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferiortrial AT huangchingwen comparingefficacyandsafetybetweennaldebainandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiawithfentanylforpainmanagementpostlaparotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferiortrial AT machengjen comparingefficacyandsafetybetweennaldebainandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiawithfentanylforpainmanagementpostlaparotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferiortrial AT wangjawyuan comparingefficacyandsafetybetweennaldebainandintravenouspatientcontrolledanalgesiawithfentanylforpainmanagementpostlaparotomystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrollednoninferiortrial |