Cargando…

Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review

AIMS: Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order to clarify the manag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, T. S., Salib, C. G., Rose, P. S., Sim, F. H., Lewallen, D. G., Abdel, M. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0548.R1
_version_ 1783404680834973696
author Brown, T. S.
Salib, C. G.
Rose, P. S.
Sim, F. H.
Lewallen, D. G.
Abdel, M. P.
author_facet Brown, T. S.
Salib, C. G.
Rose, P. S.
Sim, F. H.
Lewallen, D. G.
Abdel, M. P.
author_sort Brown, T. S.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order to clarify the management, the rate of complications and the outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English language articles published between January 1990 and February 2017 with combinations of key search terms to identify studies dealing with periacetabular resection with reconstruction in patients with a malignancy. Studies in English that reported radiographic or clinical outcomes were included. Data collected from each study included: the number and type of reconstructions, the pathological diagnosis of the lesions, the mean age and follow-up, gender distribution, implant survivorship, complications, functional outcome, and mortality. The results from individual studies were combined for the general analysis, and then grouped according to the type of reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 57 studies met the inclusion criteria and included 1700 patients. Most lesions were metastatic (41%), followed by chondrosarcoma (29%), osteosarcoma (10%), Ewing’s sarcoma (7%), and multiple myeloma (2%). The techniques of reconstruction were divided into seven types for analysis: those involving a Harrington reconstruction, a saddle prosthesis, an allograft and allograft prosthesis composite, a pasteurised autograft, a porous tantalum implant, a custom-made prosthesis and a modular hemipelvic reconstruction. The rate of complications was 50%, with infection (14%) and instability (8%) being the most common. Mortality data were available for 1427 patients (84%); 50% had died of disease progression, 23% were alive with disease, and 27% had no evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (0 to 34). CONCLUSION: Both the rate of complications and mortality are high following resection of oncological periacetabular lesions and reconstruction. Many types of reconstruction have been used with unique challenges and complications for each technique. Newer prostheses, including custom-made prostheses and porous tantalum implants and augments, have shown promising early functional and radiographic outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(1 Supple A):22–30.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6424434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64244342019-04-17 Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review Brown, T. S. Salib, C. G. Rose, P. S. Sim, F. H. Lewallen, D. G. Abdel, M. P. Bone Joint J Hip Arthroplasty: Management Factorials AIMS: Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order to clarify the management, the rate of complications and the outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English language articles published between January 1990 and February 2017 with combinations of key search terms to identify studies dealing with periacetabular resection with reconstruction in patients with a malignancy. Studies in English that reported radiographic or clinical outcomes were included. Data collected from each study included: the number and type of reconstructions, the pathological diagnosis of the lesions, the mean age and follow-up, gender distribution, implant survivorship, complications, functional outcome, and mortality. The results from individual studies were combined for the general analysis, and then grouped according to the type of reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 57 studies met the inclusion criteria and included 1700 patients. Most lesions were metastatic (41%), followed by chondrosarcoma (29%), osteosarcoma (10%), Ewing’s sarcoma (7%), and multiple myeloma (2%). The techniques of reconstruction were divided into seven types for analysis: those involving a Harrington reconstruction, a saddle prosthesis, an allograft and allograft prosthesis composite, a pasteurised autograft, a porous tantalum implant, a custom-made prosthesis and a modular hemipelvic reconstruction. The rate of complications was 50%, with infection (14%) and instability (8%) being the most common. Mortality data were available for 1427 patients (84%); 50% had died of disease progression, 23% were alive with disease, and 27% had no evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (0 to 34). CONCLUSION: Both the rate of complications and mortality are high following resection of oncological periacetabular lesions and reconstruction. Many types of reconstruction have been used with unique challenges and complications for each technique. Newer prostheses, including custom-made prostheses and porous tantalum implants and augments, have shown promising early functional and radiographic outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(1 Supple A):22–30. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6424434/ /pubmed/29292336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0548.R1 Text en ©2018 Author(s) et al This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions license (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Hip Arthroplasty: Management Factorials
Brown, T. S.
Salib, C. G.
Rose, P. S.
Sim, F. H.
Lewallen, D. G.
Abdel, M. P.
Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
title Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
title_full Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
title_fullStr Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
title_short Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
title_sort reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
topic Hip Arthroplasty: Management Factorials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0548.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT brownts reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview
AT salibcg reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview
AT roseps reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview
AT simfh reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview
AT lewallendg reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview
AT abdelmp reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview