Cargando…
Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review
AIMS: Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order to clarify the manag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0548.R1 |
_version_ | 1783404680834973696 |
---|---|
author | Brown, T. S. Salib, C. G. Rose, P. S. Sim, F. H. Lewallen, D. G. Abdel, M. P. |
author_facet | Brown, T. S. Salib, C. G. Rose, P. S. Sim, F. H. Lewallen, D. G. Abdel, M. P. |
author_sort | Brown, T. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order to clarify the management, the rate of complications and the outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English language articles published between January 1990 and February 2017 with combinations of key search terms to identify studies dealing with periacetabular resection with reconstruction in patients with a malignancy. Studies in English that reported radiographic or clinical outcomes were included. Data collected from each study included: the number and type of reconstructions, the pathological diagnosis of the lesions, the mean age and follow-up, gender distribution, implant survivorship, complications, functional outcome, and mortality. The results from individual studies were combined for the general analysis, and then grouped according to the type of reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 57 studies met the inclusion criteria and included 1700 patients. Most lesions were metastatic (41%), followed by chondrosarcoma (29%), osteosarcoma (10%), Ewing’s sarcoma (7%), and multiple myeloma (2%). The techniques of reconstruction were divided into seven types for analysis: those involving a Harrington reconstruction, a saddle prosthesis, an allograft and allograft prosthesis composite, a pasteurised autograft, a porous tantalum implant, a custom-made prosthesis and a modular hemipelvic reconstruction. The rate of complications was 50%, with infection (14%) and instability (8%) being the most common. Mortality data were available for 1427 patients (84%); 50% had died of disease progression, 23% were alive with disease, and 27% had no evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (0 to 34). CONCLUSION: Both the rate of complications and mortality are high following resection of oncological periacetabular lesions and reconstruction. Many types of reconstruction have been used with unique challenges and complications for each technique. Newer prostheses, including custom-made prostheses and porous tantalum implants and augments, have shown promising early functional and radiographic outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(1 Supple A):22–30. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6424434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64244342019-04-17 Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review Brown, T. S. Salib, C. G. Rose, P. S. Sim, F. H. Lewallen, D. G. Abdel, M. P. Bone Joint J Hip Arthroplasty: Management Factorials AIMS: Reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of a periacetabular malignancy is technically challenging and many different techniques have been used with varying success. Our aim was to prepare a systematic review of the literature dealing with these techniques in order to clarify the management, the rate of complications and the outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for English language articles published between January 1990 and February 2017 with combinations of key search terms to identify studies dealing with periacetabular resection with reconstruction in patients with a malignancy. Studies in English that reported radiographic or clinical outcomes were included. Data collected from each study included: the number and type of reconstructions, the pathological diagnosis of the lesions, the mean age and follow-up, gender distribution, implant survivorship, complications, functional outcome, and mortality. The results from individual studies were combined for the general analysis, and then grouped according to the type of reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 57 studies met the inclusion criteria and included 1700 patients. Most lesions were metastatic (41%), followed by chondrosarcoma (29%), osteosarcoma (10%), Ewing’s sarcoma (7%), and multiple myeloma (2%). The techniques of reconstruction were divided into seven types for analysis: those involving a Harrington reconstruction, a saddle prosthesis, an allograft and allograft prosthesis composite, a pasteurised autograft, a porous tantalum implant, a custom-made prosthesis and a modular hemipelvic reconstruction. The rate of complications was 50%, with infection (14%) and instability (8%) being the most common. Mortality data were available for 1427 patients (84%); 50% had died of disease progression, 23% were alive with disease, and 27% had no evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (0 to 34). CONCLUSION: Both the rate of complications and mortality are high following resection of oncological periacetabular lesions and reconstruction. Many types of reconstruction have been used with unique challenges and complications for each technique. Newer prostheses, including custom-made prostheses and porous tantalum implants and augments, have shown promising early functional and radiographic outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B(1 Supple A):22–30. British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2018-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6424434/ /pubmed/29292336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0548.R1 Text en ©2018 Author(s) et al This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions license (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Hip Arthroplasty: Management Factorials Brown, T. S. Salib, C. G. Rose, P. S. Sim, F. H. Lewallen, D. G. Abdel, M. P. Reconstruction of the hip after resection of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review |
title | Reconstruction of the hip after resection
of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review |
title_full | Reconstruction of the hip after resection
of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Reconstruction of the hip after resection
of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reconstruction of the hip after resection
of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review |
title_short | Reconstruction of the hip after resection
of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review |
title_sort | reconstruction of the hip after resection
of periacetabular oncological lesions: a systematic review |
topic | Hip Arthroplasty: Management Factorials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0548.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownts reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview AT salibcg reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview AT roseps reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview AT simfh reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview AT lewallendg reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview AT abdelmp reconstructionofthehipafterresectionofperiacetabularoncologicallesionsasystematicreview |