Cargando…

Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs

BACKGROUND: In recent years, anatomic pathology laboratories have been struck by new revenue policies secondary to the Affordable Care Act. In particular, modifications to compensation for processing prostatic core needle biopsies (PCNBs) have led to important reimbursement cuts. Herein, we explore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiz-Cordero, Roberto, Gupta, Alia, Pinto, Andre, Jorda, Merce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2018.02.001
_version_ 1783404708000432128
author Ruiz-Cordero, Roberto
Gupta, Alia
Pinto, Andre
Jorda, Merce
author_facet Ruiz-Cordero, Roberto
Gupta, Alia
Pinto, Andre
Jorda, Merce
author_sort Ruiz-Cordero, Roberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In recent years, anatomic pathology laboratories have been struck by new revenue policies secondary to the Affordable Care Act. In particular, modifications to compensation for processing prostatic core needle biopsies (PCNBs) have led to important reimbursement cuts. Herein, we explore a hypothetical reduction in the costs for the processing of PCNBs using three simple, hypothetical methods while maintaining high-standard patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the number of blocks and slides used per case on all PCNBs performed at our institution from August 2013 to September 2014 and calculated the total procedural cost for each case and for the total number of cases processed during the study period based on a published estimated procedural cost. We then estimated the procedural cost of three different proposed hypothetical scenarios that consisted in reducing the number of blocks used per case. A Student t test was used to assess the difference between real and hypothetical costs. RESULTS: A total of 4,406 paraffin blocks were used to process 363 PCNBs with a total annual procedural cost of $26,303. By implementing any of the hypothetical scenarios, the annual procedural cost was significantly reduced; the reduction could potentially be as low as $8,978 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates three hypothetical alternatives that could dramatically reduce the procedural costs of PCNBs while maintaining high-quality care. Implementation of these scenarios at a global scale could potentially have an impact on health-care cost in the USA of several millions of dollars per year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6424682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Asian Pacific Prostate Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64246822019-04-01 Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs Ruiz-Cordero, Roberto Gupta, Alia Pinto, Andre Jorda, Merce Prostate Int Original Article BACKGROUND: In recent years, anatomic pathology laboratories have been struck by new revenue policies secondary to the Affordable Care Act. In particular, modifications to compensation for processing prostatic core needle biopsies (PCNBs) have led to important reimbursement cuts. Herein, we explore a hypothetical reduction in the costs for the processing of PCNBs using three simple, hypothetical methods while maintaining high-standard patient care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We determined the number of blocks and slides used per case on all PCNBs performed at our institution from August 2013 to September 2014 and calculated the total procedural cost for each case and for the total number of cases processed during the study period based on a published estimated procedural cost. We then estimated the procedural cost of three different proposed hypothetical scenarios that consisted in reducing the number of blocks used per case. A Student t test was used to assess the difference between real and hypothetical costs. RESULTS: A total of 4,406 paraffin blocks were used to process 363 PCNBs with a total annual procedural cost of $26,303. By implementing any of the hypothetical scenarios, the annual procedural cost was significantly reduced; the reduction could potentially be as low as $8,978 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates three hypothetical alternatives that could dramatically reduce the procedural costs of PCNBs while maintaining high-quality care. Implementation of these scenarios at a global scale could potentially have an impact on health-care cost in the USA of several millions of dollars per year. Asian Pacific Prostate Society 2019-03 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6424682/ /pubmed/30937293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2018.02.001 Text en © 2019 Asian Pacific Prostate Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ruiz-Cordero, Roberto
Gupta, Alia
Pinto, Andre
Jorda, Merce
Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs
title Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs
title_full Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs
title_fullStr Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs
title_full_unstemmed Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs
title_short Cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs
title_sort cost-containment protocols for prostate core needle biopsies: hypothetical scenarios to reduce procedural costs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6424682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937293
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2018.02.001
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizcorderoroberto costcontainmentprotocolsforprostatecoreneedlebiopsieshypotheticalscenariostoreduceproceduralcosts
AT guptaalia costcontainmentprotocolsforprostatecoreneedlebiopsieshypotheticalscenariostoreduceproceduralcosts
AT pintoandre costcontainmentprotocolsforprostatecoreneedlebiopsieshypotheticalscenariostoreduceproceduralcosts
AT jordamerce costcontainmentprotocolsforprostatecoreneedlebiopsieshypotheticalscenariostoreduceproceduralcosts